Evaluation of reading vision after cataract surgery and lens implantation

ISRCTN ISRCTN44390838
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44390838
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
09/10/2009
Registration date
26/10/2009
Last edited
04/08/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Eye Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr David Spalton
Scientific

St Thomas' Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleComparison of near vision performance of the Crystalens® HD against the Technis® Aspheric Intra-Ocular Lens: a randomised controlled trial
Study objectivesThe Crystalens® HD is a new accommodative intra-ocular lens (IOL) which may potentially improve reading and near vision compared to standard monofocal lenses. The performance of this IOL will be compared to a standard monofocal IOL.
Ethics approval(s)Guys' Hospital Research Ethics Committee, London, 08/10/2009, ref: 09/H804/82
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedCataracts/near vision/intra-ocular lens
InterventionCrystalens® HD vs standard monofocal IOL

Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to participant allocation.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureVisual acuity

All primary and seconadry outcomes will be assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Secondary outcome measures1. Refraction
2. Objective optical image quality
3. Posterior capsule opacification
4. Measurement of IOL position
5. Contrast sensitivity
6. Objective and subjective measure of accommodation
7. Pupil size

All primary and seconadry outcomes will be assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Overall study start date20/11/2009
Completion date20/11/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants80 (40 per group)
Key inclusion criteria1. Both males and females, aged 18 years or older
2. Documented diagnosis of bilateral cataract requiring surgery
3. Potential visual acuity of 6/12 or better in both eyes
4. Patients who require an IOL in the range of 10-30 dioptres
5. Corneal astigmatism less than/equal to 1.0 dioptres after cataract surgery
6. Patients willing and able to provide informed consent and able to attend follow-up appointments
Key exclusion criteria1. Any coexisting ocular disease
2. Treatment with any ocular medication apart from artificial tear drops
3. Patients who are not fluent in English
4. Females of childbearing potential who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding
Date of first enrolment20/11/2009
Date of final enrolment20/11/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

St Thomas' Hospital
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Karen Ignatian
R&D Department
2nd Floor, Conybeare House
Great Maze pond
London
SE1 9RT
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00j161312

Funders

Funder type

Government

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (UK) - Cataract and IOL Research Fund

No information available

Fight for Sight (UK)
Government organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
Fight for Sight, Inc., National Council to Combat Blindness, Fight for Sight (U.S.), FFS
Location
United States of America
Bausch and Lomb (USA) - providing the lenses

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2013 Yes No