Ultrasound guided spermatic cord block for scrotal surgery

ISRCTN ISRCTN44647819
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44647819
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
10/05/2009
Registration date
26/06/2009
Last edited
23/02/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Marius Wipfli
Scientific

University Hospital Berne
Bern
3010
Switzerland

Email marius.wipfli@insel.ch

Study information

Study designNon-randomised, non-controlled feasibility pilot study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designNon randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleUltrasound guided spermatic cord block for scrotal surgery: a feasibility pilot study
Study objectivesBlindly performed spermatic cord blockade are known to be difficult, painful and has potential risk (intravasal injection of local anaesthesia, perforation of vessels and perforation of the deferent duct). The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of ultrasound guided spermatic cord blockade.
Ethics approval(s)Local ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission KEK) approved on the 10th November 2008 (ref: 167/08)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedRegional anaesthesia
InterventionAfter antiseptic cleaning of the external genitalia, the spermatic cord is grasped gently between the left thumb and index finger. Using a 2 cm pedriatic ultrasound probe the spermatic cord is identified by searching the testicular artery and the deferent duct. Using a 22 G Microlance needle the local anaesthesia (10 ml) is slowly injected around the ductus deferens avoiding vessel perforation.

Patients will then receive either a subcapsular orchiectomy or a vaso-vasostomy.

As of 17/06/2010 the above anticipated end date of this trial has been amended to the actual end date. The initial anticipated end date at the time of registration was 31/12/2009.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureSuccess rate of the blockade defined as surgery without any substitution (analgesics, conversion to general anaesthesia).
Secondary outcome measures1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0 - 10) during blockade and every 30 minutes after beginning of surgery
2. Volume of local anaesthesia for blockade
3. Duration of blockade: defined as point of time of the first demand of analgesics after surgery
4. Patient satisfaction (scale 0 - 5) in general 1 week after surgery
Overall study start date01/01/2009
Completion date01/03/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants20
Key inclusion criteriaElectively planned patients (male or female aged at least 16 years - no upper age limit), for subcapsular orchiectomy or vaso-vasostomy.
Key exclusion criteria1. Refusal of regional anaesthesia
2. Patients with anticoagulation
3. Anamnesis of haemorrhagic diathesis
4. Adipositas (Body Mass Index [BMI] greater than 40)
Date of first enrolment01/01/2009
Date of final enrolment01/03/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

University Hospital Berne
Bern
3010
Switzerland

Sponsor information

University of Bern (Switzerland)
University/education

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy
Inselspital Bern
Bern
3010
Switzerland

Email marius.wipfli@insel.ch
Website http://www.unibe.ch/eng/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02k7v4d05

Funders

Funder type

University/education

University of Berne (Switzerland) - Scientific fund of the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/02/2011 Yes No