An investigation into the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN46428072 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN46428072 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | N0265183531 |
- Submission date
- 28/09/2007
- Registration date
- 28/09/2007
- Last edited
- 25/07/2012
- Recruitment status
- Stopped
- Overall study status
- Stopped
- Condition category
- Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr B Cooper
Scientific
Scientific
Respiratory Medicine
Selly Oak Hospital
Birmingham
B29 6JD
United Kingdom
Study information
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Scientific title | |
| Study objectives | The aim of this study is to establish whether the addition of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to a standard programme of pulmonary rehabilitation offers additional clinical benefit in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pulmonary rehabilitation has been consistently effective in improving exercise capacity and health status in patients with COPD and is now recommended as part of the management of such individuals. Recently there has been interest in the systemic effects of COPD including peripheral muscle weakness that is a limiting factor to exercise in patients with COPD. Specific stimulation of these muscles may improve their metabolic and physiological function and thus alleviate premature exercise termination as a result of peripheral muscle fatigue. This may then allow greater benefits to be obtained during pulmonary rehabilitation in terms of both exercise tolerance and health status. Secondary research questions are as follows: 1. Is it feasible to carry out NMES at the same time as pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD? 2. Does the benefit depend on the severity of disease? 3. Does the benefit depend on the baseline physiological status or strength of the peripheral skeletal muscles? 4. Does NMES influence the rate of detraining after the programme has finished? |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) |
| Intervention | The study design will be a single blind randomised controlled study in which the patients will be randomised to one of two groups: 1. Pulmonary rehabilitation plus NMES 2. Pulmonary rehabilitation plus sham NMES Patients will each be given an identical NMES device and therefore will not be aware which study group they are in. COPD patients will be recruited from those attending for the 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme at the Lung Investigation Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Trust, Birmingham. Following recruitment and consent patients will undergo a baseline evaluation prior to the exercise training programme that will be repeated at the end of the 8-week training regime. The assessment pre- and post-pulmonary rehabilitation will require patients to attend the hospital for three visits at each time point in order to complete the baseline and outcome measurements (N.B. patients already undergo two assessment visits at the start and end of the current pulmonary rehabilitation programme, thus participation in the research study will only require them to attend the laboratory for one extra visit at the start and end of the programme). Patients will also be assessed on these occasions as to whether they require additional educational support with regard to medication, inhaler technique, dietary advice and social support. Those measurements highlighted with an asterisk indicate those that are not part of the current protocol for patients undergoing assessment for pulmonary rehabilitation. Assessment Day 1: 1. Anthropometric measurements (weight, height) 2. Peak oxygen uptake 3. Endurance exercise capacity 4. Health status (36-item short form health survey [SF36], Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire [CRQ], MRC scale* and Hospital Anxiety and Depression [HAD]* questionnaires) 5. Habitual activity (patients will be issued with an activity monitor for use at home) Assessment Day 2: 1. Lung function 2. Body composition (skin fold thicknesses, body impedance) 3. Walking distance (incremental shuttle walking test [ISWT] distance) 4. Respiratory muscle strength (Pi max and Pe max)* 5. Hand grip strength (HGS)* Assessment Day 3: 1. Quadriceps force* 2. Calf muscle blood flow capacity* Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme: Patients will attend the programme three times weekly for a period of 8 weeks. During each visit they are required to exercise for 45 minutes at an intensity of 80% of their peak oxygen uptake. Thus all patients receive a protocol that is individualised to their exercise capacity. The duration and intensity of exercise is gradually increased from 30 to 45 minutes over the first 2 - 3 weeks of the programme in order to provide a gradation of work over the initial training sessions. An interval training approach is adopted where appropriate in order to allow patients with excessive dyspnoea to recover between excessive bouts, e.g. patients exercise for 4 minutes and then have 1 minute rest. N.B. In some patients it may be difficult to achieve 30 minutes in the first exercise session therefore patients may start at 20 minutes and then build up. Similarly, not all patients will achieve 45 minutes at the end of the programme. The exercise performed will be aerobic training using a combination of cycling, walking (treadmill) and stepping. Patients will attend the hospital in small groups of two or three and rotate around the equipment during the 45 minute session, e.g. 15 minutes on each exercise modality. Patients that show significant oxygen desaturation (greater than 4% to less than 90%) will be given supplemental oxygen during the training in order to maintain the saturation above 90% and to prevent excessive dyspnoea that may limit training. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and sham stimulation: Active electrical stimulation will be applied to the quadriceps and calf (muscles of both legs) using Neurotech NT2000 programmable portable constant voltage muscle stimulators (Biomedical Research Ltd., Ireland) for a total of 8 weeks. Each quadriceps muscle will be stimulated for 15 minutes per day at a frequency of 50 Hz on three days of the week. On three alternate days of the week, the calves will be stimulated twice daily at a frequency of 8 Hz for 15 minutes. During stimulation, patients will be advised to be seated with the foot resting flat on the floor in order to provide some resistance load to the contracting muscle. The stimulators record usage as a measure of compliance and patients will be given a diary to record date, time and level stimulation output. For sham stimulation, stimulators will be programmed to deliver pulses at high frequency (90 Hz) but short duration which provides a tingling sensation but no active muscle contraction and controls for placebo effect. Please note that this trial was stopped because of poor recruitment and staff shortages. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | Improvement in exercise tolerance assessed by the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test. This will be assessed by comparing the magnitude of the improvement in walking distance between patients randomised to receive pulmonary rehabilitation alone and those receiving pulmonary rehabilitation plus NMES. |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Changes in peak oxygen uptake 2. Changes in endurance exercise performance 3. Changes in health status 4. Changes in muscle function 5. Changes in calf muscle blood flow capacity All these will be assessed in terms of firstly, whether there has been an overall improvement in the function in each group and secondly, whether there is a statistically significant difference in the magnitude of the improvement between patients receiving pulmonary rehabilitation alone and those receiving pulmonary rehabilitation plus NMES. |
| Overall study start date | 26/08/2006 |
| Completion date | 26/08/2007 |
| Reason abandoned (if study stopped) | Participant recruitment issue |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | Two groups of 20 (40 in total) |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Diagnosis of COPD 2. Declining functional capacity (Medical Research Council [MRC] grade 3 and above) 3. On optimal pharmacological treatment 4. Clinical stable (no exacerbation within 4 weeks of initial assessment and not taking antibiotics/oral steroids for an acute infection) 5. Smokers will be included 6. Patients receiving long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) will be included 7. Evidence of nutritional depletion - body weight less than 90% of ideal body weight (IBW) and/or fat-free mass (FFM) less than 69% IBW (males) and 67% IBW (females) 8. Evidence of peripheral muscle weakness (quadriceps force less than 80% predicted and/or hand grip strength less than 80% predicted) |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Unstable heart disease (and patients with pacemakers) 2. Untreated hypertension 3. Untreated hypothyroidism 4. Angina 5. Pregnancy 6. Arthritis (such that patient is unable to perform an exercise test and take part in an exercise training programme) or other mobility problems that will limit exercise capacity 7. Patients unable (or unwilling) to attend the hospital three times weekly for exercise training sessions 8. Patients unwilling to commit to lifestyle changes 9. Patients having an acute exacerbation of their disease within the previous 4 weeks |
| Date of first enrolment | 26/08/2006 |
| Date of final enrolment | 26/08/2007 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Respiratory Medicine
Birmingham
B29 6JD
United Kingdom
B29 6JD
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
Government
Government
The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)20 7307 2622 |
|---|---|
| dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk | |
| Website | http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en |
Funders
Funder type
Government
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust (UK) - NHS R&D Support Funding
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
