Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Retrospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Dr Chantal Ropars


Contact details

rue du Petit Château
Charenton Le Pont

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number


Study information

Scientific title

Intensive care by osteopathy for victims of road traffic accidents (RTA) (AIVIO: Aide Intensive aux Victimes d’Accident de la Voie Publique (AVP) par Ostéopathie): a single centre, pilot, prospective, randomised controlled trial


AIVIO (Aide Intensive aux VIctimes par Ostéopathie)

Study hypothesis

1. The sensory stimuli developed by functional osteopathy technique are thought to produce similar effects to sensory stimuli used in eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), inducing the same ponto-geniculo-occipital (PGO) waves that potentially activate the transfer of hippocampal traumatic memory information to the semantic cortex.
2. Functional osteopathy appears to produce additional therapeutic mechanisms: somatic work appears to reactivate cell assemblies, useful when verbal reconstruction is difficult or impossible. Without verbal induction, recall occurs when psychic resistance lowers, protecting fragile victims from potential depressive or psychotic decompensation. The “tactile dialogue” is respectful of the body’s resistance and in this manner rapidly leads to a feeling of security, narcissistic reassurance and peaceful dissociation. These elements of the therapeutic context bring about recall of the traumatic information without anxiety, further eliminating avoidance strategies which maintain post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
3. Finally, myofascial tensions acquired from the accident (whiplash in particular) potentially contribute to neurovegetative disorders, to sensitisation of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis (HPA) and to persistent pain. Eliminating these mechanical tensions relieves muscular skeletal pain, itself having the potential to produce catecholaminergic and glutamatergic disorders.
4. The psychic and physical action of functional osteopathy could thus potentially contribute to regulating pathognomonically low cortisol levels of PTSD.

Ethics approval

1. Ethics Committee of the Clinical Psychology Research Unit of the UCL (Université Catholique de Louvain) approved on 22nd March 2006.
2. Ethics Committee of the hospital, CHNDRF of Charleroi (Belgium) approved on 20th June 2006, ref: OM/100

Study design

Single centre pilot prospective randomised controlled trial

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet


Post-traumatic stress disorder


Treatment group 1: trauma victims (11 people), two men aged between 49 and 51 and nine women aged between 25 and 56.

Treatment involving 10 sessions of functional osteopathy, of one hour each, spaced a minimum of 15 days apart.

As opposed to structural osteopathy which seeks to restore skeletal alignment by what is known as “high velocity and low amplitude” cracking and manipulations of the joints, the mode of action of functional osteopathy is to “retrace the lesion without irritation” by way of meticulous adjustment of the connective tissue (including musculoskeletal structures) to balance tensions. While structural osteopathy may be described in easily identifiable and specific techniques, the functional approach relies on a true “tactical dialogue” with the tissues. Once the therapist has brought the tense tissues to their position of least tension in the three dimensions of space (front/back, right/left, superficial/deep), these myofascial structures release tension which the osteopath and often times the patient can perceive.

Control group 2: RTA victims on the waiting list, three women between 23 and 63

Control group 3: Young volunteers in good health and with no anxiety disorders, four women aged 23 to 30. Serious stress events affected three of them during the research study.

Intervention type



Not Applicable

Drug names

Primary outcome measures

1. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale (PCLS)
2. Salivary cortisol (IBL - AMERICA Salivary Cortisol HS ELISA Kit, a solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on the principle of competitive binding), measured twice a day for the 28 days before and after the treatment

Secondary outcome measures

1. Quality of life (Medical Outcome Survey SF-36) meassured at each session
2. Pain: EVA and the item bodily pain (MOS SF-36) measured at each session
3. Heart rate measured at each session
4. Dissociation (Dissociative Experience Scale - DES) measured once before and once after the treatment
5. Depression (Beck depression Inventory 21) measured once before and once after the treatment
6. Non traumatic anxiety disorders (phobic disorders, panic attacks, generalized anxiety scale - PPGA) measured once before and once after the treatment
7. Alexithymia (Bermond and Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire- BVAQ) measured once before and once after the treatment

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned


Participant inclusion criteria

1. Recent road traffic accident victims
2. Positive test for PTSD (PCLS>44) over 6 months after the RTA
3. Accept saliva tests: 2 daily saliva samples, one on waking and the other 30 minutes after the first, on an empty stomach and without having smoked or brushed teeth. Over a period of 28 days before and after treatment

Participant type


Age group




Target number of participants

Planned sample size: 60

Participant exclusion criteria

1. People under 18 years of age
2. People under pretraumatic corticotherapy
3. People whose alcohol consumption regularly exceeds two glasses for women or three glasses for men
4. People who did not provide the saliva samples

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment


Trial participating centre

99, rue du Petit Château
Charenton Le Pont

Sponsor information


Catholic University of Louvain (Université Catholique de Louvain) (Belgium)

Sponsor details

Place de l'Université

Sponsor type




Funder type


Funder name

Investigator initiated and funded (Belgium)

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype


Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Participant level data

Not provided at time of registration

Results - basic reporting

Publication summary

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes