Pain after kugel versus lichtenstein repair: a randomised trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN47267588
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN47267588
Secondary identifying numbers NL779, NTR790
Submission date
28/12/2006
Registration date
28/12/2006
Last edited
14/01/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr S Nienhuijs
Scientific

Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
P.O. Box 9015
Nijmegen
6500 GS
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)24 365 7657
Email s.nienhuijs@hccnet.nl

Study information

Study designRandomised, controlled, parallel group, single blinded trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titlePain after kugel versus lichtenstein repair: a randomised trial
Study objectivesThe open pre-peritoneal approach in inguinal hernia repair might have the benefit of a mesh in the preferred space without the disadvantages of an endoscopic procedure.
Ethics approval(s)Approval received by the local ethics board (CMO Regio Arnhem-Nijmegen), on the 22-12-2003 (ref: JvG/CMO 0301).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPain, Inguinal hernia
InterventionThe Lichtenstein procedure and the Kugel procedure for inguinal hernias.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureVisual Analogue Sccale (VAS) pain score at three months postoperatively.
Secondary outcome measures1. VAS pain scores and consumed analgesics during the first two weeks postoperatively
2. Pain Disability Index scores
3. Neurological disturbances
Overall study start date01/12/2004
Completion date01/10/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants172
Total final enrolment172
Key inclusion criteriaAdult patients who had been referred for elective primary, unilateral inguinal hernia repair and gave informed consent.
Key exclusion criteriaAn irreducible inguinoscrotal hernia or previous procedures using the preperitoneal approach
Date of first enrolment01/12/2004
Date of final enrolment01/10/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen
6500 GS
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital (The Netherlands)
Hospital/treatment centre

Postbus 9015
Nijmegen
6500 GS
Netherlands

Website http://www.cwz.nl/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/027vts844

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital (The Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2007 14/01/2021 Yes No

Editorial Notes

14/01/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
3. The NTR numbers have been added.