A randomised controlled trial in primary care of a novel method of using preformed metal crowns to manage decay in primary molar teeth: the Hall technique

ISRCTN ISRCTN47267892
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN47267892
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
12/06/2007
Registration date
05/07/2007
Last edited
21/09/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mrs Nicola Innes
Scientific

Level 9
Dental Hospital and School
University of Dundee
Park Place
Dundee
DD1 4HN
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1382 635992
Email n.p.innes@dundee.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial, split-mouth design.
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesIt has long been known that the carious process can be arrested. There has been growing awareness that it may not be necessary to remove as much carious dental tissue as was previously thought. By simply changing the environment within which the caries is progressing, and making it unfavourable for the micro-organisms involved, the number and diversity of micro-organisms can be dramatically reduced. This means that the carious disease process may be slowed down, perhaps halted, and possibly even reversed. The Hall technique makes use of a simplified, potentially more acceptable method of placing Preformed Metal Crowns (PMCs). It is used to seal the carious lesion into the tooth, making the environment unfavourable by limiting the lesion’s access to nutrients. This should slow, or even arrest the progress of the carious lesion through the tooth. In addition, by avoiding the use of Local Anaesthesia (LA) and caries removal, it is possible that the Hall technique might be more acceptable than standard restorative techniques to children, their parents and General Dental Practitioners (GDPs). The randomised controlled clinical trial reported in this thesis was designed to investigate these hypotheses.

The overall aim of the research project was to determine whether the Hall technique offered benefits over current practice to restore carious primary molar teeth in general dental practice in Tayside. Specifically, the potential benefits of interest were:
1. Acceptability of the procedure
2. Long-term pulpal health
3. Longevity of the restoration, and
4. Costs of the procedures together with their follow-up maintenance

This led to the following null hypotheses being tested through the clinical trial:
1. After a minimum of 23 months, there is no difference in the incidence of signs and symptoms of pulpal disease between teeth restored with control restorations and those with PMCs fitted using the Hall technique
2. After a minimum of 23 months, there is no difference in longevity of restorations between control restorations and PMCs fitted using the Hall technique
3. Children, their carers and GDPs have no preference between the Hall technique and control restorations placed by their GDPs, and
4. After a minimum of 23 months, there is no difference in the cost of provision and maintenance of the control restorations and Hall PMCs to the service provider

Information on the pilot trial at http://www.dundee.ac.uk/tuith/Articles/rt03.htm
Ethics approval(s)Received from the Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics (ref: 108/00).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDental decay
InterventionA preformed metal (stainless steel) crown will be placed on one of the pairs of carious primary molar teeth of the child. The other molar tooth will be given a standard treatment.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe following outcomes will be assessed at least 23 months after the placement of the crown:
1. Absence of signs/symptoms of pulpal pathology
2. Resoration failure requiring intervention
Secondary outcome measures1. Acceptability of the intervention technique
2. Cost effectiveness
Overall study start date01/07/2001
Completion date01/07/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit4 Years
Upper age limit9 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants120
Key inclusion criteriaChildren aged 4 to 9 years of age with pairs of carious primary molar teeth, matched for arch, tooth type and extent of caries.
Key exclusion criteriaMedical contra-indications, i.e., children at risk of infective endocarditis.
Date of first enrolment01/07/2001
Date of final enrolment01/07/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Level 9
Dundee
DD1 4HN
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Chief Scientist Office (UK)
Government

Scottish Executive Health Department
St Andrew's House
Regent Road
Edinburgh
EH1 3DG
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)131 244 2246
Email karen.ford@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
Website http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/cso/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01bw7zm61

Funders

Funder type

Government

Chief Scientists Office (UK) - Research Training Fellowship Award, Scottish Executive

No information available

3M ESPE (USA)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2011 Yes No