Copeptin as a novel diagnostic and prognostic marker in the management of neurological and neurosurgical patients with sodium imbalance

ISRCTN ISRCTN48080544
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN48080544
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00390962
Secondary identifying numbers 157/06
Submission date
11/10/2006
Registration date
21/11/2006
Last edited
02/09/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Mira Katan
Scientific

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition
University Hospital Basel
Petersgraben 4
Basel
4051
Switzerland

Phone +41 (0)61 265 2525
Email katanm@uhbs.ch

Study information

Study designProspective, observational study.
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCase-control study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Scientific titleCopeptin as a novel diagnostic and prognostic marker in the management of neurological and neurosurgical patients with sodium imbalance
Study acronymCOSMOS - (Copeptin in OSMOregulation and Stress assessment)
Study objectivesSodium imbalance is common and an adverse prognostic factor in hospitalised patients. However, identifying the causes of sodium imbalance is challenging in clinical practice. Levels of Anti-Diuretic Hormone (ADH) are elevated in patients with stroke correlating with disease severity and stress level; however, its measurement is cumbersome. ADH is derived from a larger precursor peptide along with Copeptin, which is a more stable peptide directly mirroring the production of ADH. Copeptin can be assayed readily in plasma. Early prognostic factors to predict in-hospital mortality and medium/long-term outcome in critically ill neurological patients, are helpful to guide and tailor early decisions on treatment, discharge from the intensive care unit and application of interventions to prevent deterioration of neurological functions.

The aim of this trial is to evaluate Copeptin as a diagnostic tool in disturbances of water homeostasis and prognostic tool to predict outcome in a well-defined cohort of stroke patients and patients undergoing intracranial surgery.

Study hypotheses:
1. Copeptin will improve the diagnostic accuracy to diagnose sodium imbalances as compared to routinely used markers.
2. Copeptin will be a reliable prognostic tool, dependent or independent of sodium imbalance, to predict short-term (i.e. in-hospital) and medium-term (i.e. three months) clinical outcome in stroke patients.
Ethics approval(s)The study has been approved by the local ethical review board (Ethics Committee of Basel [EKBB] ref. no.: 157/06).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSodium imbalance
InterventionAfter informed consent, all routinely determined baseline data will be assessed including medical history, clinical items (i.e. neurological status, volume status, pulse rate, blood pressure, weight) and laboratory items (i.e. urine/serum osmolality, electrolytes, among others). All patients will have a follow-up with clinical and laboratory assessment until the day of discharge.

After three months, they will be followed-up by a structured telephone interview to assess outcome (mortality, morbidity, as assessed by the Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel index). Copeptin will be assessed in a batch analysis upon completion of the plasma asseveration.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Copeptin will improve the diagnostic accuracy to diagnose sodium imbalances as compared to routinely used markers (gold standard) and algorithms.
2. Copeptin will be a reliable prognostic tool, dependent or independent of sodium imbalance, to predict short-term (i.e. in-hospital) and medium-term (i.e. three months) clinical outcome in stroke patients.
Secondary outcome measures1. Comparison of copeptin with other risk scores and factors (cerebrovascular, National Institute of Health and Stroke Scale [NIHSS])
2. Comparison of copeptin with other biomarkers (Brain Natriuretic Peptide [BNP], Procalcitonin [PCT], endothelin) in light of the first endpoint
Overall study start date06/11/2006
Completion date06/11/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants400 - 500
Key inclusion criteria1. All consecutive patients who are admitted to the emergency department with an ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) according to the World Health Organization criteria with symptom onset within the last three days
2. All consecutive patients who undergo intracranial surgery due to:
a. pituitary tumors
b. IntraCerebral Haemorrhage (ICH)
c. SubArachnoidal Haemorrhage (SAH)
d. chronic subdural haematoma
e. head trauma with contusio cerebri
f. intracranial abcesses
Key exclusion criteriaPatients without informed consent
Date of first enrolment06/11/2006
Date of final enrolment06/11/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition
Basel
4051
Switzerland

Sponsor information

University Hospital Basel (Switzerland)
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Professor Beat Mueller
Division of Endocrinology
Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition
Petersgraben 4
Basel
4031
Switzerland

Phone +41 (0)61 265 2525
Email happy.mueller@unibas.ch
Website http://www.universitaetsspital-basel.ch/#
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04k51q396

Funders

Funder type

Other

Privately funded trial by the Principal Investigator of this trial.

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 01/12/2009 02/09/2021 Yes No
Results article 21/09/2010 02/09/2021 Yes No
Results article 01/05/2013 02/09/2021 Yes No
Results article 29/07/2014 02/09/2021 Yes No

Editorial Notes

02/09/2021: Publication references and ClinicalTrials.gov number added.