Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Diabetes is often complicated by the development of diabetic nerve disease (neuropathy). Diabetic neuropathy affects nerves that are outside of the brain and spinal cord, such as nerves in the arms, legs, hands and feet. Symptoms of diabetic neuropathy may include pain, such as a feeling of burning, prickling, tingling, aching, pins and needles usually occurring on both sides of the body affecting hands, legs or feet. Some patients may not be able to distinguish between sharp and dull and hot and cold (altered sensation).
The aim of the study is to find out whether neuropathic pain in painful diabetic neuropathy is relieved by taking a tablet called taurine. Taurine occurs naturally in the body and it is thought that patients with painful diabetic neuropathy have less taurine in their body. By increasing the level of taurine in the body it is hoped that patients will experience less pain. This in turn may have the added benefit of improving quality of life.
Who can participate?
180 patients from Diabetic Clinics at Heartlands and Solihull (UK) will be invited to take part in this study. You are eligible to take part if you have developed the complication of diabetes known as neuropathy and are 18-70 years old.
What does the study involve?
The patients will be randomly split into two groups. One group will receive the experimental drug and the second group will receive a dummy (placebo). Patients will be asked to attend a study visit to determine whether they are suitable to take part in this study. Tests will include a physical assessment (such as blood pressure and weight). An electrocardiogram (a painless test that records the electrical activity of your heart) will be performed. You will also have tests to determine the extent of your neuropathy, including your response to vibratory stimulation (tuning fork), cold detection (the difference between hot and cold) and comparisons made between areas on your body where you have pain and where you dont. You will have an Autonomic Nerve Function Test performed on you. The test is painless and helps the study doctor decide whether you have neuropathy. You will be requested to attend the clinic for monthly physical assessments, collection of pain diaries and collection of the study drug to measure compliance. At three months a physical assessment will be performed including the above mentioned assessments of neuropathy. At a second visit, the pain and sleep diaries will be collected and any adverse events recorded. The questionnaires will again be administered and the experimental drug collected to measure compliance to the study. Four weeks after the study is completed, you will be contacted to assess how you are feeling now that the study drug has been stopped.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
We hope that the treatment will help the pain in your feet. However, this cannot be guaranteed. The information we get from this study may help us to treat future patients with painful diabetic neuropathy more effectively.
Where is the study run from?
The majority of the visits will be held at Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, and at least two visits will be completed at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (UK).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2006 to December 2014
Who is funding the study?
National Institutes of Health (USA)
Who is the main contact?
Prof. Martin J. Stevens,
m.j.stevens@bham.ac.uk
Study website
Contact information
Type
Scientific
Contact name
Prof Martin J. Stevens
ORCID ID
Contact details
University of Birmingham
The Medical School
Institute for Biomedical Research
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B45 8PF
United Kingdom
+44 (0)121 414 8162
m.j.stevens@bham.ac.uk
Additional identifiers
EudraCT/CTIS number
IRAS number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
RG 05-126
Study information
Scientific title
Taurine and painful diabetic neuropathy
Acronym
Study hypothesis
Our overall hypothesis is that taurine depletion contributes to the development of painful Diabetic Neuropathy (DN). The rationale is based on:
a. Evidence implicating oxidative stress, altered neuronal calcium signaling and neuronal hyperexcitability in the development of painful DN
b. The emerging role of taurine as an important endogenous antioxidant, calcium regulator, neurotrophin, modulator of neuronal hyperexcitability and analgesic
c. Our data implicating a critical role for taurine depletion and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of experimental DN.
The experimental approach will be to utilize biochemical and electrophysiological techniques to evaluate the potential of taurine treatment alone to decrease pain in patients with DN. These studies will test a novel mechanistically-based therapeutic approach to a common disabling and often refractory complication of diabetes.
Ethics approval(s)
Leeds (East) Research Ethics Committee, 22/09/2006
Study design
Randomised blinded parallel two-group clinical study
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)
Hospital
Study type
Treatment
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Condition
Diabetic neuropathy
Intervention
Taurine 3,000 mg/day (3 capsules) orally vs placebo 3 capsules daily for 12 weeks
Intervention type
Drug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
Phase
Not Specified
Drug/device/biological/vaccine name(s)
Taurine
Primary outcome measure
1. Pain perception is measured using the Short-Form McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire (SF-MMPQ), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a Present Pain rating Intensity index (PPI) at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks
2. Pain is measured using daily pain diaries, recorded for 12 weeks.
3. Physician and Patient Global Assessment of Change, assessed at 12 weeks post inclusion into the study (final assessment)
Secondary outcome measures
1. Sleep is measured using the Mean Sleep Interference Score on a daily basis upon awakening
2. Mean Pain Scores are measured using daily diaries which comprise an 11-point Likert-type scale which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) upon awakening
3. Change in the subjects overall status is measured using the Clinical and Patient Global Impression of Change at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Overall study start date
01/10/2006
Overall study end date
01/12/2014
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Type 1 or type 2 diabetes as defined by the World Health Organization Classification
2. Duration of diabetes of at least 5 years
3. The HbA1c should be <10.5% with <1% fluctuation of HbA1c levels over the past 6 months
4. Age between 18 and 80 years
5. Women of childbearing potential must be using an acceptable method of contraception to prevent pregnancy when they are enrolled in the study and must agree to continue to practice an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of their participation in the study
6. Must meet the specified criteria for painful DN and have no risk factors for other causes for neuropathy
7. Willingness to sign the Center for Research Ethics Committee (COREC) approved informed consent form
Participant type(s)
Patient
Age group
Adult
Lower age limit
18 Years
Sex
Both
Target number of participants
180
Participant exclusion criteria
1. Nursing mothers, pregnant women (excluded by a negative pregnancy test)
2. Patients with a history of drug or alcohol dependence in the last 5 years
3. Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease
4. Patients with hypoxemic disease
5. Patients with severe systemic disease other than diabetes which has as a recognized complication neuropathy or severe chronic pain
6. Patients with symptoms of neuropathic pain in the upper limbs alone
7. Significant changes in skin conditions in the areas to be tested which could alter sensation
8. Subjects with a previous history of neuropathic foot ulceration or Charcot arthropathy
10. Patients currently taking medications that could affect symptoms of painful DN except paracetamol (up to 4 g/d) or aspirin (up to 325 mg/d)
11. Patients experiencing an increase in pain after analgesic medication washout to levels which would, in the view of the PI, require prohibited analgesic therapy within a 12 week period
12. Patients whose creatinine clearance is less than 70 ml/min or have significant hepatic disease (Aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], y-GT >2 times upper limit of normal)
13. Patients with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) outside normal limits
14. Patients with a history of previous kidney, pancreas or cardiac transplantation
15. Serious or unstable medical or psychological state that may interfere with study participation
16. Patients having taken other systemic investigational drugs (especially for neuropathy) or initiating a new or experimental insulin delivery device within 3 months of starting the study
17. Morbidly obese patients (Body Mass Index [BMI] greater than 40)
18. Patients who refuse to sign the informed consent
Recruitment start date
01/10/2006
Recruitment end date
01/12/2014
Locations
Countries of recruitment
England, United Kingdom
Study participating centre
University of Birmingham
Birmingham
B45 8PF
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Organisation
University of Birmingham (UK)
Sponsor details
The Medical School
Institute for Biomedical Research
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B45 8PF
England
United Kingdom
+44 121 414 8162
m.j.stevens@bham.ac.uk
Sponsor type
University/education
Website
ROR
Funders
Funder type
Government
Funder name
National Institutes of Health (USA)
Alternative name(s)
Institutos Nacionales de la Salud, US National Institutes of Health, NIH
Funding Body Type
government organisation
Funding Body Subtype
National government
Location
United States of America
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Not provided at time of registration
Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan
IPD sharing plan summary
Not provided at time of registration
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|