Add-on salmeterol versus montelukast in Arg/Arg-16 asthmatics

ISRCTN ISRCTN49849003
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN49849003
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00655616
Secondary identifying numbers sm2006msd01
Submission date
18/04/2008
Registration date
31/07/2008
Last edited
09/11/2012
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Somnath Mukhopadhyay
Scientific

Maternal and Child Health Sciences
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
Tayside
Dundee
DD1 9SY
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1382 660111 ext. 36297
Email s.mukhopadhyay@dundee.ac.uk

Study information

Study designInterventional, single-centre, randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details provided in the interventions field to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA proof-of-concept study to evaluate the benefit from add-on therapy with montelukast versus salmeterol in children with asthma carrying the Arg/Arg-16 beta2-receptor genotype
Study objectivesThe purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with asthma who carry a genotype associated with adverse outcomes with long-acting beta-2 agonists like salmeterol show greater benefit from the use of an asthma drug that works via alternative pathways like montelukast.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics on the 2nd November 2006 (ref: 06/S1401/86).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAsthma
InterventionGroup one (comparison):
1. Seretide 100 Accuhaler (50 micrograms of salmeterol and 100 micrograms of fluticasone propionate) 1 dose twice daily plus 1 tablet daily of placebo montelukast
2. Seretide 250 Accuhaler (50 micrograms of salmeterol and 250 micrograms of fluticasone propionate) 1 dose twice daily plus 1 tablet daily of placebo montelukast
3. Seretide 500 Accuhaler (50 micrograms of salmeterol and 500 micrograms of fluticasone propionate) 1 dose twice daily plus 1 tablet daily of placebo montelukast

Group two (active):
1. Flixotide Accuhaler (fluticasone propionate) 50 micrograms per blister; 1 blister dose twice daily plus 1 tablet daily of montelukast
2. Flixotide Accuhaler (fluticasone propionate) 100 micrograms per blister; 1 blister dose twice daily plus 1 tablet daily of montelukast
3. Flixotide Accuhaler (fluticasone propionate) 250 micrograms per blister; 1 blister dose twice daily plus 1 tablet daily of montelukast
4. Flixotide Accuhaler (fluticasone propionate) 500 micrograms per blister; 1 blister dose twice daily plus 1 tablet daily of montelukast

Doses of montelukast or placebo:
Up to 6 years: 4 mg once daily
6 - 14 years: 5 mg once daily
15 years and above: 10 mg once daily

The total duration of treatment and follow-up for all treatment arms is one year.

Please use the following contact details to request a patient information sheet:
Dr Kaninika Basu
Maternal and Child Health Sciences
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
University of Dundee
Dundee
DD1 9SY
Email: k.basu@dundee.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1382 660111
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Montelukast, salmeterol, fluticasone propionate
Primary outcome measureOral montelukast is associated with reduced school absences in comparison to inhaled salmeterol over a period of 1 year in Arg/Arg-16 asthmatic children.
Secondary outcome measures1. Oral montelukast is associated with reduced out-of hours visits/hospital visits or admissions in comparison to inhaled salmeterol over a period of 1 year
2. Oral montelukast is associated with a reduction in airway resistance in comparison to inhaled salmeterol over a period of 1 year
3. Oral montelukast is associated with reduced exhaled nitric oxide levels in comparison to inhaled salmeterol over a period of 1 year
4. Oral montelukast is associated with reduced salivary eosinophilic cationic protein levels in comparison to inhaled salmeterol over a period of 1 year
5. Oral montelukast is associated with improved asthma specific quality-of-life in comparison to inhaled salmeterol over a period of 1 year
6. Oral montelukast is associated with improved morning peak expiratory flow rate in comparison to inhaled salmeterol over a period of 1 year
Overall study start date01/08/2007
Completion date31/12/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit5 Years
Upper age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants120
Key inclusion criteriaAll children and adolescents (5 - 18 years, either sex) with asthma in Tayside (Scotland) known:
1. To carry the Arg/Arg-16 genotype, and
2. Currently on inhaled steroids, and
3. Inhaled bronchodilators according to need
Will be telephoned or contacted through home visits to establish if they have had:
1. Any school absences from asthma, or
2. Out-of-hours visits to General Practitioner (GP)/hospital visits or admissions due to asthma over the previous 12 months
Key exclusion criteriaThe presence of serious respiratory or multi-system disease (e.g. cystic fibrosis, cancer under current treatment)
Date of first enrolment01/08/2007
Date of final enrolment31/12/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Maternal and Child Health Sciences
Dundee
DD1 9SY
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Dundee (UK)
University/education

c/o Mr Simon Temperley
Dundee
DD1 4HU
Scotland
United Kingdom

Website http://www.dundee.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03h2bxq36

Funders

Funder type

University/education

University of Dundee (UK)

No information available

Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited (MSD) (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/04/2013 Yes No