Is toothpaste containing xylitol + fluoride more effective than toothpaste containing only fluoride in preventing dental caries among pre-schoolers?

ISRCTN ISRCTN51682476
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN51682476
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
18/11/2011
Registration date
06/01/2012
Last edited
03/11/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims:
Dental caries (tooth decay) is the most common disease among pre-schoolers. Low-income pre-schoolers are more likely to be at risk for tooth decay. Current public health strategies have failed to significantly control tooth decay in this age group. This is an important problem to address because untreated tooth decay leads to pain, infection, which can lead to poor academic outcomes, systemic health problems, cellulitis, and in rare cases, death.
Currently, fluoride toothpaste is used to prevent tooth decay in pre-schoolers. Studies suggest that xylitol, a naturally-occurring sweetener, also helps to prevent tooth decay. Based on the idea that adding xylitol to fluoride toothpaste leads to a more effective product, toothpaste manufacturers have developed a xylitol+fluoride toothpaste. However, until now, no studies have been conducted that compare fluoride toothpaste to xylitol+fluoride toothpaste as a way to prevent tooth decay in pre-schoolers. The Head Start Program is a national program targeted at low-income pre-schoolers ages 3-5 years. The aim of the program is to prepare vulnerable pre-schoolers for kindergarten by ensuring good overall health. Many Head Start Programme classrooms include a tooth brushing program that is overseen by the classroom teacher. Teachers are trained to ensure the pre-schoolers follow the correct tooth brushing method. Currently, all Head Start classrooms that have a tooth brushing program use fluoride toothpaste.

Who can participate?
Pre-schoolers are healthy and that consent is received for participation by the pre-schooler’s caregiver.

What does the study involve?
This study will introduce xylitol-fluoride toothpaste to two Head Start classrooms and fluoride-toothpaste to two other Head Start classrooms. Our aim is to compare tooth decay rates for pre-schoolers in the two groups, from the start of the study to 9 months. We will also collect plaque and saliva samples at 9 months to see if the two groups differ in the levels of Streptococcus mutans, the bacteria which is responsible for plaque and tooth decay.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Pre-schoolers participating may be less likely to experience tooth decay. All tooth brushing activities were directly supervised by multiple classroom teachers, so the risks to the pre-schoolers were minimal.

Where is the study run from?
From four Head Start Programme classrooms in Majuro in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (50 pre-schoolers per classroom).

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study took place during the 2010/2011 school year.

Who is funding the study?
United States Health Resources and Services Administration - Targeted Oral Health Services Systems.

Who is the main contact?
Dr Ohnmar Tut
ohnmar@u.washington.edu

Contact information

Dr Ohnmar Tut
Scientific

Republic of the Marshall Islands
Ministry of Health
Post Office Box 16
Majuro
96960
Marshall Islands

Study information

Study designSingle-center double-blinded classroom randomized prospective clinical trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA clinical trial comparing fluoride toothpaste and xylitol+fluoride toothpaste in reducing dental caries among pre-schoolers at increased risk for tooth decay: a randomised prospective trial
Study objectivesXylitol+fluoride toothpaste is more effective than fluoride toothpaste at slowing the rates of tooth decay progression in pre-schoolers
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDental caries
InterventionArm 1: supervised in-class toothbrushing once/day with xylitol+1400ppm fluoride toothpaste
Arm 2: supervised in-class toothbrushing once/day with 1400ppm fluoride toothpaste
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTotal increase in the number of primary tooth surfaces with untreated dental caries from baseline to end of school year
Secondary outcome measuresLevels of intraoral plaque and salivary mutans streptococci (at end of school year)
Overall study start date01/09/2010
Completion date30/06/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Upper age limit5 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants200 participants
Total final enrolment196
Key inclusion criteria1. Enrolled in one of four pre-schools in Majuro, Marshall Islands
2. Under age 5
3. Parent consent to participate in the trial
Key exclusion criteriaAllergy or sensitivity to fluoride toothpaste
Date of first enrolment01/09/2010
Date of final enrolment30/06/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Marshall Islands

Study participating centre

Republic of the Marshall Islands
Majuro
96960
Marshall Islands

Sponsor information

Republic of the Marshall Islands (Marshall Islands)
Government

c/o Dr Ohnmar Tut
Ministry of Health
Post Office Box 16
Majuro
96960
Marshall Islands

Funders

Funder type

Government

United States Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) (USA) - Targeted Oral Health Services Systems TOHSS Grant ref: H47MC08647

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 01/01/2014 03/11/2022 Yes No

Editorial Notes

03/11/2022: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number has been added from the reference.