A prospective randomised study comparing 'standard open' haemorrhoidectomy with the 'completely closed and sutured' technique.
ISRCTN | ISRCTN52491619 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN52491619 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N0084144553 |
- Submission date
- 30/09/2005
- Registration date
- 30/09/2005
- Last edited
- 11/04/2014
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mr Muzaffar Ahmad
Scientific
Scientific
Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Cliff Gardens
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Not specified |
Study type | Not Specified |
Scientific title | |
Study objectives | Does the completely closed and sutured technique of haemorrhoidectomy reduce discomfort and enhances healing in comparison to the standard open method? |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Surgery: Haemorrhoidectomy |
Intervention | All patients diagnosed as having grade 3 or 4 haemorrhoids and require corrective surgery who fulfil the inclusion criteria seen in the general surgical outpatient department of Scunthorpe And Goole hospitals will be invited to take part in the study until the sample size has been achieved. After patients have agreed to participate, they will be randomised into one or other of the treatment arms: 'standard open' haemorrhoidectomy vs 'completely closed and sutured' technique. |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | 1. A routine follow up clinical appointment will be sent to the patient at 4 weeks after surgery. Extent of healing will be scored on a scale from 1-4. (1:<25%; 2:25-50%; 3:50-75%; 4:complete healing). 2. Post operative SF 36 questionnaire at 4 weeks after surgery 3. Duration in days taken to return to normal daily activities 4. Percent satisfaction after the procedure 5. Consent to undergo the procedure again if required |
Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
Overall study start date | 02/01/2002 |
Completion date | 02/01/2004 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Not Specified |
Sex | Not Specified |
Target number of participants | With reference to previously published studies, comparing open versus stapled techniques a similar sample size n=20 in each arm was arrived at. |
Key inclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
Key exclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
Date of first enrolment | 02/01/2002 |
Date of final enrolment | 02/01/2004 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Department of Health
Government
Government
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)20 7307 2622 |
---|---|
dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk | |
Website | http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Trust (UK), NHS R&D Support Funding
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |