Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
We are interested in developing a new treatment for patients with a stroke caused by bleeding into the brain (intracerebral haemorrhage). In the hours to days after bleeding occurs, we know that inflammation occurs in the brain around the blood clot. Although inflammation is the body's natural response to injury, when it continues unchecked it can worsen damage. We know that it does worsen damage after an intracerebral haemorrhage and we want to investigate whether blocking inflammation can improve outcomes. Between the blood and brain, there is a blood-brain barrier. How much of a drug can get to where it needs to act in the brain is largely governed by how well it can cross the blood-brain barrier. This makes the blood-brain barrier very important in drug development, as drugs to block brain inflammation have to cross it to get to where they need to go. However, when the brain is damaged, the blood-brain barrier can become leaky. We know very little about this after intracerebral haemorrhage. This study will determine how leaky the blood-brain barrier is in the first three days after intracerebral haemorrhage.
Who can participate?
Adult intracerebral haemorrhage patients.
What does the study involve?
Participants undergo an MRI scan to measure leakiness in the first 3 days after their stroke. Twenty of these patients will go on to have a PET scan to show brain inflammation 2- 7 days after their stroke. By putting the two scans together, we will be able to estimate how much of an anti-inflammatory drug will get to inflamed areas in the brain. This will help us to know how much of the drug to give and when to give it in subsequent studies.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no benefits to participation in the study but this will be made clear to participants at first approach. Participants will be exposed to ionising radiation during the PET scan. The maximum dose that is received as part of the scan is equivalent to 1.4 years of background radiation in the UK. There may also be discomfort associated with the blood sampling and MRI/PET scan.
Where is the study run from?
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (UK).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2015 to August 2017.
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK).
Who is the main contact?
Sharon Hulme
Trial website
Contact information
Type
Scientific
Primary contact
Mrs Sharon Hulme
ORCID ID
Contact details
Clinical Sciences Building
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom
Type
Scientific
Additional contact
Dr Adrian Parry-Jones
ORCID ID
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-3846
Contact details
Clinical Sciences Building
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom
Additional identifiers
EudraCT number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
19650
Study information
Scientific title
IntraCerebral Haemorrhage: Imaging Microglial Activation and bloodbrain barrier leakaGE (IMAGE-ICH) - an observational cohort study
Acronym
IMAGE-ICH
Study hypothesis
Observational study to determine the extent to which blood-brain barrier breakdown during acute ICH co-localises with activated microglia.
More details can be found here: http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/Search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=19650
Ethics approval
NRES Northwest-Haydock committee, 20/10/2015, ref: 15/NW/0677
Study design
Non-randomised; Observational; Design type: Cohort study
Primary study design
Observational
Secondary study design
Cohort study
Trial setting
Hospitals
Trial type
Treatment
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Condition
Topic: Stroke; Subtopic: Acute Care; Disease: In hospital study, Community study
Intervention
This is an observational study, thus no intervention is being tested. Baseline assessment will include demographics, premorbid health and medications, details of presenting signs and symptoms, clinical observations, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and details of clinical management. A research MR scan will be performed within 3 days of onset, at SRFT. If additional inclusion criteria are met, participants will undergo a [11C](R)-PK11195 PET scan at 2-7 days after symptom onset. Blood samples will be collected for CRP, IL-6, ESR and FBC at each scanning session. A 90-day assessment will measure clinical outcomes and complete participation.
Intervention type
Other
Phase
Drug names
Primary outcome measures
To determine the extent to which blood-brain barrier breakdown during acute ICH co-localises with activated microglia
Secondary outcome measures
1. To determine whether the magnitude and extent of blood-brain barrier breakdown is associated with haematoma size and location after ICH
2. Perform exploratory analyses testing for associations between blood-brain barrier permeability and brain inflammation with peripheral inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes
Overall trial start date
01/10/2015
Overall trial end date
30/09/2017
Reason abandoned
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Age 18 or over
2. Acute, spontaneous, supratentorial ICH within 24 h of symptom onset
3. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score = 9
4. Research MR scan can be performed within 3 days of symptom onset.
Additional inclusion criteria for PET imaging (d 27):
5. GCS = 14
6. Able to transfer from chair to bed with assistance of two people
7. Deemed medically stable by medically qualified researcher for transfer to Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (WMIC) on day of PET scan
Participant type
Patient
Age group
Adult
Gender
Both
Target number of participants
Planned Sample Size: 40; UK Sample Size: 40
Participant exclusion criteria
1. Contraindication to magnetic resonance (MR) scanning
2. Pre-existing brain lesion (e.g. tumour, previous stroke) that is likely to interfere with the planned analysis
3. ICH known or strongly suspected of being secondary to a structural vascular malformation (e.g. cerebral aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, cavernoma, dural arteriovenous fistula), tumour, haemorrhagic transformation of an ischaemic stroke, or venous sinus thrombosis.
4. Clear history of recent (<7 days prior to onset) head trauma, thought to be the cause of intracerebral haemorrhage.
5. Any known inflammatory disease which in the opinion of the PI may interfere with interpretation of the study results.
6. Known, uncorrected bleeding disorder.
7. Female patient who may be pregnant or who is breast feeding
8. Significant renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30)
9. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the PI or his delegatee, may put the participant at risk
because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant’s ability to participate in the study.
10. Neurosurgical procedure performed since admission or booked for surgery.
11. Treatment with drugs known to or likely to interfere with PK11195 binding (including benzodiazepines, steroids, minocycline) that cannot be stopped
in sufficient time to prevent interference with PET scanning.
Recruitment start date
15/10/2015
Recruitment end date
30/09/2017
Locations
Countries of recruitment
United Kingdom
Trial participating centre
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Organisation
University of Manchester (UK)
Sponsor details
Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences
Zochonis Building
Brunswick Street
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9PL
United Kingdom
Sponsor type
University/education
Website
http://www.cardiovascular.manchester.ac.uk/vascularandstroke/research/stroke/
Funders
Funder type
Government
Funder name
National Institute for Health Research
Alternative name(s)
NIHR
Funding Body Type
government organisation
Funding Body Subtype
Federal/National Government
Location
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
To be confirmed at a later date
Intention to publish date
Participant level data
Available on request
Results - basic reporting
Publication summary