The effectiveness of routine antenatal visits. Does choice improve wellbeing?

ISRCTN ISRCTN53422810
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN53422810
Protocol serial number C/PHI/19/20-6-94/JEWELL/D
Sponsor NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Funder NHS Executive South West (UK)
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
26/01/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr David Jewell
Scientific

University of Bristol
Canynge Hall
Whiteladies Road
Bristol
BS8 2PR
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)117 928 7308
Email David.Jewell@bristol.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of encouraging women to decide the frequency and timing of their antenatal attendances within a framework of a reduced number of prescribed attendances. The main hypothesis was: adopting a more flexible approach to antenatal care would result in an increase in maternal satisfaction.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPregnancy; antenatal care
Intervention1. 'Traditional' care
2. 'Flexible' care
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Women's attitudes to pregnancy and motherhood, measured by one subscale of the Maternal Adjustment and Maternal Attitudes questionnaire (MAMA)
2. Satisfaction with antenatal care
3. Perception of the speed of recognition of antenatal complications.
4. The amount of antenatal care received was used as a measure of process
5. The prevalence of depression was measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date30/11/1998

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target sample size at registration609
Key inclusion criteriaPregnant women at low risk of obstetric outcomes
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not match inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment01/06/1995
Date of final enrolment30/11/1998

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

University of Bristol
Bristol
BS8 2PR
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/10/2000 Yes No