Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Eight percent of people in the United Kingdom are estimated to have persistent (chronic) neuropathic (nerve) pain. Medications are the most common treatment method but often have limited benefit or unwanted side effects. Surgical treatments such as spinal cord stimulation (implantation of a device which applies an electrical current to the spine to relieve pain) are then often considered. External non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation (EN-PNS) is a form of electrical stimulation that involves placing a pen shaped electrode onto the skin, which can be easily self-administered by patients. It has been found that EN-PNS can provide significant pain relief for people with neuropathic pain in a particular area (localized), however there is currently no evidence to support its use within the National Health Service (NHS). The aim of this study is to find out whether EN-PNS is effective in reducing pain for people with long-standing neuropathic pain following damage to the nerves that connect to the brain and spinal cord (peripheral nerve injury).
Who can participate?
Adults with long-standing (at least 12 months) neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to receive one of two forms of EN-PNS treatment (both forms of EN-PENS will look the same however the stimulation frequency will differ). Participants are trained to deliver their own treatment over 1-3 sessions over the period of one week, before being asked to continue treatment themselves at home. Participants are able to choose how often they use the treatment, but it must be for at least 10 minutes once a day. At the end of this home treatment phase participants will have the option to have a further three months treatment extension, a three month switch to the use the device the other group used, or to end the trial. Participants in both groups complete a number of questionnaires at the start of the study and then after three months to measure their pain levels, emotional and physical functioning and quality of life.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration
Where is the study run from?
The Walton Centre NHS trust (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2016 to June 2019
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Mrs Selina Johnson
Mrs Selina Johnson
The Walton Centre
+44 151 556 3160
A randomised patient-assessor blinded controlled trial of External non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury (EN-PENS)
EN-PNS can provide effective pain reduction for people with chronic neuropathic pain following a peripheral nerve injury.
Northwest- Preston Research Ethics committee, 29/04/16, ref: 16/NW/0273
Randomised patient-assessor blinded controlled parallel group two-arm superiority add on trial
Primary study design
Secondary study design
Randomised parallel trial
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information leaflet.
Neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury
Patients will be randomised to receive one of two forms of EN-PENS treatment (xavant stimpod NMS460 or control) by an independent randomisation service via an online system based at the King’s Clinical Trials Unit (King’s CTU) based at the Institute of Psychiatry. Randomisation will use a 1:1 allocation by a computer generated randomisation schedule (concealed). Blocking will be used to ensure a balance between the numbers in the two groups throughout recruitment. Varying block sizes will be used.
Participants in both arms are trained to deliver their own treatment over 1-3 sessions in which they receive 5 minutes of stimulation (these sessions will be delivered within the period of 1 week). They will then continue treatment for 3 months at home where they will determine their own treatment frequency (minimum of 1x day for 10 minute period).
Xavant stimpod NMS460: A frequency of 2Hz, pulse width 1.0 ms and maximal amplitude of 30mA will be used to deliver stimulation via a ball shaped electrode. The electrode shape creates a high current density which when used in combination with the specified stimulation parameters achieves analgesia through a specific mechanism, preferential activation of superficial nociceptive A-delta fibres inducing long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic strength.
Control: The machine will look identical and use the same frequency (2 Hz). A square flat shaped TENS electrode, a pulse width of 0.1ms delivered at a maximum current of 6mA will be used with the control device; this will produce a lower current density/intensity not activating small fibres. The display will appear to allow patients the same freedom to increase stimulation on both machines to 30mA; however the control devices delivered maximal output will be limited to 6mA.
Participants are followed up at the end of the home treatment phase (12 weeks). At the end of the home treatment phase participants will have the option to have a further 3 months treatment extension, 3 month switch to the opposite treatment arm, or to end the trial.
Primary outcome measures
Average 24 hour pain intensity recorded on an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale, averaged over the last 7 days of the 3 month home-loan period.
Secondary outcome measures
1. Quality of life is measured using the EuroQOL-5D-5L questionnaire at baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months and end of where applicable end of optional treatment extension/swap (6 months)
2. Physical function will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire interference subscale at baseline and 3 months
1. Emotional functioning is measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire at baseline and 3 months
2. Perceived control in terms of confidence in being able to perform day to day tasks despite pain is measured using the pain self-efficacy questionnaire at baseline and 3 months
3. Surface area of allodynia is measured in cm2 using a brush to identify the boundaries of the affected area (a washable marker pen will mark an outline of the boundaries and this will be traced onto clear plastic acetate) at baseline and 3 months
4. The intensity of allodynia will be measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS), as the average of 3 strokes across the allodynic area, during study screening
5. Quality of pain is measured using the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) questionnaire at baseline and 3 months
6. A specially designed optional sensory test will be conducted for patients who consent to this at 3 months which will help aid understanding of the working mechanisms of treatment
7. Health economic analysis – will be conducted using self-reported measures of health care utilisation and EuroQOL-5D-5L at baseline and 3 months
8. Potential medical suitability for invasive NeuroModulation will be determined by review of case notes and clinic letters by a pain and neuromodulation consultant
Overall trial start date
Overall trial end date
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Chronic neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury, definite or probable:
1.1. Pain with a distinct neuroanatomically plausible distribution
1.2. A history suggestive of a relevant lesion or disease affecting the peripheral or central somatosensory system
1.3. Demonstration of the distinct neuroanatomically plausible distribution by at least one confirmatory test
1.4. Demonstration of the relevant lesion or disease by at least one confirmatory test
Grading of certainty for the presence of neuropathic pain: definite neuropathic pain: all (1 to 4); probable neuropathic pain: 1 and 2, plus either 3 or 4 (Treede, Jensen et al. 2008)
2. At least 12 months duration of neuropathic pain symptoms
3. Adults age 18 years or above
4. Moderate to severe pain intensity (Average 24 hour pain intensity over 7-days at baseline of ≥ 5/10 but not dropping below 4 on any single day, on an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS))
5. Pain localised to the distribution of 1-2 peripheral nerves
6. Distribution of pain that will allow for the nerve to be stimulated proximally from the areas of pain.
7. Discontinuation of numbing pain medications (lidocaine patches 4 weeks prior, Capsaicin 4 months prior)
8. Patients should have trialed first line pharmacotherapy (First-line treatment include either tricyclic antidepressants or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, pregabalin or gabapentin)
9. Moderate- severe brush stroke allodynia (Defined as pain of ≥ 5/10 on an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS), when brush stroke is applied to the affected area (average of 3 strokes over affected area))
10. Willing to not commence any new medications/ treatments for their neuropathic pain whilst involved in the trial
11. Women of childbearing potential may participate providing they are using adequate birth control methods for the duration of the trial (including accepted methods of contraception such as; barrier methods, intrauterine device IUD, contraceptive implant, depot injection, oral contraception’s and abstinence (as part of lifestyle choice))
Target number of participants
Participant exclusion criteria
1. Absolute numbness within area of pain (suggests sufficient nerve damage to render EN-PNS unlikely to work)
2. Known EN-PNS contraindications (pregnancy and cardiac pacemakers)*
3. Other chronic pains or unstable medical conditions, which in the opinion of the investigator would make the trial unsuitable for the patient
4. Unstable pain intensity or pain medications 6 weeks prior to the study that in the judgement of the PI would interfere with assessment of outcome
5. Persons participating in an interventional trial within the past 3 months
6. Persons participating in a non-interventional trials completed within 2 weeks prior to start of the trial
7. Diagnosed psychiatric or mental health disorder which in the judgment of the PI interferes with successful study participation
8. Inability to comply with the study protocol for the trial-period of 3 months
9. Inability to complete outcome measures
10. Incapacity to understand the information necessary to provide informed consent
11. Other implanted device for the same pain complaints such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS)
12. Phantom Limb pain**
*Non pregnancy confirmed by urine test at baseline and at treatment end
**Stump pain can be treated
Recruitment start date
Recruitment end date
Countries of recruitment
Trial participating centre
The Walton Centre NHS trust
National Institute for Health Research
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Planned publication in a high-impact peer reviewed journal.
Intention to publish date
Participant level data
Available on request
Results - basic reporting