Randomised evaluation of alternative electrosurgical modalities to treat bladder outflow obstruction in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

ISRCTN ISRCTN53810731
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN53810731
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 94/04/09
Submission date
25/04/2003
Registration date
25/04/2003
Last edited
08/11/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Christopher Fowler
Scientific

Academic Urological Unit
The Royal London Hospital
4th Floor
Alexandra Wing
Queen Mary and Westfield College
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7377 7226
Email C.G.Fowler@mds.qmw.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific titleRandomised evaluation of alternative electrosurgical modalities to treat bladder outflow obstruction in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Study objectivesMany of the newer means of treating symptomatic BPH require expensive new equipment which requires significant additional capital investment. We consider that before investing in such equipment we should evaluate cheaper electrosurgical methods which may be similarly efficacious.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUrological and genital diseases: Other urological and genital disease
Intervention1. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
2. Transurethral diathermy vaporisation of the prostate (TUDVP).
Perioperative complications and time to discharge, determined by strictly defined criteria will be compared.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe efficacy of the operation will be assessed by symptom scores, urine flow rate studies at two months and one year after surgery. A questionnaire covering adverse events, quality of life, impact on sexual function and customer satisfaction will be administered preoperatively and at each visit by a trained nurse counsellor. This trial will be coordinated and the results analysed for safety, effectiveness and cost benefit in collaboration with the Prostate trials Office (PROTO) at Bristol.
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration.
Overall study start date01/06/1996
Completion date31/07/2001

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexMale
Target number of participants530
Key inclusion criteria530 men with BPH causing bladder outflow obstruction will be recruited from four centres: one teaching hospital and three district general hospitals.
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration.
Date of first enrolment01/06/1996
Date of final enrolment31/07/2001

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Academic Urological Unit
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Department of Health (UK)
Government

Quarry House
Quarry Hill
Leeds
LS2 7UE
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1132 545 843
Email Sheila.Greener@doh.gsi.gov.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/index.htm
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03sbpja79

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article HTA monograph 01/02/2005 Yes No

Editorial Notes

08/11/2022: Internal review.