Is colour duplex ultrasound more sensitive than clinical assessment in predicting early failure of primary arteriovenous fistulae (AVF)?
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN54883610 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN54883610 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | N0234190027 |
- Submission date
- 28/09/2007
- Registration date
- 28/09/2007
- Last edited
- 09/06/2017
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mr Matthew Bell
Scientific
Scientific
Southmead Hospital
Westbury on Trym
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)117 959 6363 |
|---|---|
| matthew.bell@nbt.nhs.uk |
Study information
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Is colour duplex ultrasound more sensitive than clinical assessment in predicting early failure of primary arteriovenous fistulae (AVF)? |
| Study objectives | 1. Principal question: is ultrasound surveillance of primary AVF necessary or is clinical assessment adequate for primary AVF survival? 2. Principal objective: to define a method to reduce early primary AVF failure. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Cardiovascular: Primary arteriovenous fistula |
| Intervention | Purpose of Study: This study is intended to improve the service available to patients attending hospital for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Many patients suffering from CKD will require some sort of kidney replacement therapy. Some may be fortunate enough to receive kidney transplant, however those that are not so fortunate will need dialysis of some kind. Dialysis is available in two ways: Peritoneal and Haemodialysis (HD). This study is concentrated on those preparing for HD. In order to begin dialysis a 'man-made' short circuit of the circulatory system must be created. This involves the connection of a vein to the side of an artery in the arm of the patient. This connection allows the development of the vein into a significantly larger vessel that allows easy needling during dialysis. This also means that the volume of flow through this connection, known as an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), also increases dramatically. It is this high blood flow that allows the patient to receive dialysis in just a few hours, when the flow of blood is reduced the time taken to dialyse is vastly increased. The development of these AVF is not always simple and they can often fail, sometimes only minutes after surgery. In order to improve the chances of survival we would like to investigate the protocols currently used to survey these AVF during development and assess the use of a new protocol and technique. Currently clinical assessment of the developing AVF occurs around two weeks post operation. Any problems identified at this stage mean the patient can be referred for an alternative investigation. This alternative investigation is duplex ultrasound. Evidence supports ultrasounds ability to identify accurately any abnormality in the developing AVF without the need for an invasive technique. This study aims to compare the ability of clinical assessment and ultrasound to accurately predict the outcome of a developing AVF. Whilst doing this we intend to identify the most accurate time for ultrasound surveillance of the developing AVF. Methodology Consented patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: Group 1: Clinical assessment Group 2: Ultrasound assessment Patients in both groups will be seen in the vascular laboratory for a pre access vein map to be produced. This allows the surgeon to choose the optimum location for the AVF to be created. It will also reduce the chance for bias towards those patients that require pre-access vein mapping as a result of an inconclusive clinical assessment. Group 1: These patients will be seen by Tessa Savage (renal coordinator) to perform a clinical assessment of the developing AVF on two occasions, firstly 2 weeks post operation and secondly; 6 weeks post operation. Should any abnormality be identified by the clinical assessment then the patient will enter the normal pathway of care. Group 2: These patients will be seen by Matthew Bell (clinical vascular scientist) to perform a duplex ultrasound surveillance scan. This scan will occur on five occasions: immediately post operation whilst still an inpatient, 1 week post operation (outpatient), 2 weeks post operation (outpatient), 4 weeks post operation (outpatient) and 6 weeks post operation (outpatient). Should patients in either group become concerned about the development of the AVF outside of the appointment times then they will be encouraged to contact either Matthew Bell or Tessa Savage to arrange further examination. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | 1. The specificity and sensitivity of both clinical assessment and ultrasound in predicting AVF success or failure 2. ROC curves will be used to identify the most accurate ultrasound criteria found for predicting AVF failure or success 3. ROC curves will also be used for identifying the optimum time for ultrasound surveillance. |
| Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
| Overall study start date | 01/02/2007 |
| Completion date | 01/06/2008 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 144 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Both groups will be recruited in the same way through the renal consultants and will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. It is predicted that the sample size will be no more than 144 patients in the first year as this is the predicted maximum number of patients requiring primary AVF in this timescale. It is predicted that the final number of patients required for the sample will be approximately 50 per group as a result of a retrospective study performed previously by Robbin et al (2002). Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patient requiring primary AVF 2. No previous AVF or dialysis via central line 3. Upper limb vein/artery suitable for AVF formation 4. The patients' eGFRml/min/1.73m^2 must be greater than 15 to minimise likelihood of access being required before maturation of primary AVF |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Children (<18 years old) 2. Those patients unable to give consent 3. AVG formation required 4. Previous AVF 5. Previous access via central line 6. Patients with failing transplant 7. Patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/02/2007 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/06/2008 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Southmead Hospital
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
Government
Government
The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)207 307 2622 |
|---|---|
| dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk | |
| Website | http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en |
Funders
Funder type
Government
North Bristol NHS Trust
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
09/06/2017: No publications found in PubMed, verifying study status with principal investigator.
