Lymph nodal dissection of the groin in skin malignant melanoma surgery - does the dissection technique have an impact on wound healing: scalpel versus ultrasonic assisted versus electrocauter

ISRCTN ISRCTN55731750
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN55731750
Secondary identifying numbers FKH-PCH-2008-1
Submission date
25/07/2008
Registration date
17/12/2008
Last edited
17/12/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Albrecht Krause-Bergmann
Scientific

Leitdender Arzt
Abteilung für Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie
Fachklinik Hornheide
Dorbaumstr. 300
Münster
48157
Germany

Email krause-bergmann@fachklinik-hornheide.de

Study information

Study designProspective, randomised, double blind, monocentric trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study objectivesLymph nodal dissection of the groin for melanoma of the skin is known as a high wound complication procedure. The surgical procedure has been described very similarly for decades. For the tissue dissection there are different well-experienced techniques. These are the traditional scalpel dissection, the ultrasonic assisted and the electrocauter assisted dissection technique. All equipment is CE certified and use is currently up to the surgeons referrals.

Evidence based decision making should be standard in todays medical treatment. In surgery evidence-based data is very rare. Concerning the described question for the impact of the dissection technique for the groin dissection there is no data available. Wound healing is a major problem in this group of patients. In medical literature a complication rate up to almost 50% (wound infection, healing problems, seroma, lymph fistula, lymphoedema, etc.) is being reported.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval pending from the Ethikkommission der Ärtzekammer Westfalen Lippe as of 28/07/2008.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedWound healing in skin malignoma surgery
InterventionThe surgical procedure is the same for all the patients. There will be three groups for the different tissue dissection techniques:
1. Dissection with the scalpel/scissors
2. Ultrasonic assisted dissection
3. Electrocautery assisted dissection

The follow-up will be 3 months in all arms.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureLength of hospital stay (days), evaluated at the time of hospital discharge of the patient
Secondary outcome measures1. Amount of wound drainage (ml), evaluated at the time of hospital discharge of the patient
2. Time of drainage in situ (days), evaluated at the time of hospital discharge of the patient
3. Cost of treatment (Euro), evaluated after the 3 month follow-up
Overall study start date01/09/2008
Completion date30/04/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants120 (40 patients per group)
Key inclusion criteria1. Indication for a lymph nodal dissection of the groin for a skin malignant melanoma
2. Aged over 18 years, either sex
Key exclusion criteria1. Non-consent
2. Aged under 18 years
3. Mentally disabled
Date of first enrolment01/09/2008
Date of final enrolment30/04/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

Leitdender Arzt
Münster
48157
Germany

Sponsor information

Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Germany)
Industry

Hummelsbütteler Steindamm 71
Norderstedt
22851
Gibraltar

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/023edjq13

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Germany) - received funding only; the study was independently performed and initiated by the hospital department

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan