Efficacy and safety of using insulin glargine 300 U/mL in patients with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs failing to achieve their blood sugar targets

ISRCTN ISRCTN56991780
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN56991780
Secondary identifying numbers GLARGL07590
Submission date
03/07/2019
Registration date
03/07/2019
Last edited
27/09/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
People with type 2 diabetes usually start their diabetes treatment with lifestyle changes and oral antidiabetic drugs. However, type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease and therefore, in many cases insulin treatment is also needed. An often used way to start insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes is to add one shot of basal insulin per day to the oral antidiabetic drugs used. Taking insulin goes hand in hand with hypoglycemia, an unwanted state of too low blood sugar with several symptoms, sometimes even including fainting and coma. Therefore, fear of hypoglycemia often prevents people with diabetes achieving their blood sugar targets. On the other hand it is very important for patients with diabetes to reach their blood sugar targets to avoid late-stage complications like kidney disease, eye disorders and heart disease. Several newer types of insulins have been developed which reduce the risk of hypoglycemia compared with older types of insulin. The aim of this study is to find out whether switching the basal insulin to insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter, a newer basal insulin, in people with type 2 diabetes who already use another basal insulin as add-on to oral antidiabetic drugs and who did not reach their target blood sugar levels, allows more people to achieve their blood sugar targets safely, i.e. with low risk for hypoglycaemia, in daily clinical practice.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 or over with type 2 diabetes who use oral antidiabetic drugs and a basal insulin other than insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter and are treated by a German, Austrian or Swiss physician.

What does the study involve?
Participants are elected by their treating physician to join this study, if the physician has already decided to switch an existing basal insulin treatment to insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter independent of the participation in this study. Participants are treated by their physician as usual and visit their doctor in the usual time intervals (in Germany, Austria and Switzerland usually every 3 months for diabetes patients). The physician documents several parameters at the first visit, when the basal insulin is switched, and at least 6 and 12 months thereafter. The study lasts one year in total. The participants are asked to answer a diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire at the first visit and at the visit 12 months thereafter.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There will be no immediate direct benefit or risk to those taking part because this is a non-interventional study, which means that patients are treated as they would be without participation in this study. However, the results of this study will add to the knowledge of how insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter is used in daily clinical practice and how its use in combination with oral antidiabetic drugs can be improved.

Where is the study run from?
The TOP-2 study is being run by Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH and takes place in diabetologists’ and general practioners’, family physicians’ and internists’ practices all over Germany, Austria and Switzerland, where people with type 2 diabetes are treated.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2014 to December 2017

Who is funding the study?
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH (Germany)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Dr Jochen Seufert, MD, chief physician of Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany, email: office-seufert.med@uniklinik-freiburg.de

Contact information

Dr Katrin Pegelow
Scientific

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Potsdamer Str. 8
Berlin
D-10785
Germany

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-9002-5305
Phone +49 (0)30 2575 2920
Email Katrin.Pegelow@sanofi.com

Study information

Study designNon-interventional open-label multi-center multi-national single-arm prospective observational study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designLongitudinal study
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet.
Scientific titleInitiation of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in type 2 diabetic patients after failure of pre-existing BOT treatment with any other basal insulin
Study acronymTOP-2
Study objectivesThe aim of this non-interventional study (NIS) was to document the treatment effectiveness and safety after 6 and 12 months for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who switched from a basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT) other than insulin glargine 300 U/mL to a BOT with insulin glargine 300 U/mL used under real-life conditions in daily clinical practice.
Ethics approval(s)1. Germany: approved 16/04/2015, Ethik-Kommission der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg / Ethical committee of Albert Ludwig University Freiburg (Engelberger Str. 21, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany; Tel: +49 (0)761 270 72600; www.ethik-Kommission.uniklinik-freiburg.de), ref: 152/15
2. Austria: approved 17/08/2015, Ethikkommission der Stadt Wien / Ethical committee of the city of Vienna (Magistratsabteilung 15 - Gesundheitsdienst der Stadt Wien, Magistrat der Stadt Wien; Thomas-Klestil-Platz 8, 1030 Wien, Austria; Tel: +43 (0)1 4000 87754; Email: ethikkommission@ma15.wien.gv.at), ref: EK 15-187-VK
3. Switzerland: approved 19/08/2015, Ethikkommission Thurgau / Ethical committee Thurgau (Kantonale Ethikkommission, Spitalcampus 1, 8596 Münsterlingen, Switzerland; Tel: + 41 (0)71 686 22 44), ref: KEKTGOV2015/22
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedType 2 diabetes mellitus in adult patients requiring basal insulin therapy
InterventionAll data were collected three times during this NIS; at baseline, approximately 6 and approximately 12 months after starting insulin glargine 300 U/mL therapy. Baseline documentation (documentation 1) had to start immediately after switching to insulin glargine 300 U/mL in patients with T2DM failing to achieve their glycemic targets on a pre-existing BOT treatment with any other basal insulin. This had to occur after the physician had decided independently of the participation in this study to prescribe insulin glargine 300 U/mL and when thereafter the physician and the patient had decided the participation of the latter in this study. Next measurements were documented approximately 6 months thereafter (documentation 2), and the last measurements were documented approximately 12 months thereafter (documentation 3). Besides this, all FBG measurements available were collected on a monthly base asking for documentation of changes during the last four weeks each month. Also, dosing information was captured every month; i.e. actual dose and frequency of dose changes during the last four weeks. Data had to be generated during daily clinical routine of the physicians. Any change in the patient’s antidiabetic therapy regimen was strictly left at the physician’s discretion. No therapeutic decision of the physician should have been based upon participation in this NIS. Titration algorithm was also left at the investigator’s discretion. Participating physicians were distributed equally all over Germany, Austria and Switzerland to allow for a representative sample of German, Austrian and Swiss patients with T2DM switching the basal insulin component of their BOT regimen.

In order to allow for a valid statistical analysis even in smaller subgroups of patients (as distribution within the predefined subgroups may not be equal) it was planned to document and analyze about 3,000 patients in this NIS (2,500 patients from Germany and 250 from Austria and Switzerland, each). The planned number of participating sites was 665. Participating doctors were mostly to be general practitioners, family physicians and internists (office based) in Germany and Switzerland and diabetologists/endocrinologists in Austria as the kind of physicians who usually start and follow-up basal insulin therapy in patients with T2DM. Also, diabetologists were to be included in the study. The practices were to be distributed equally all over Germany, Austria and Switzerland to allow for geographical representativeness.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureFasting blood glucose (FBG) response rate during month 1-6 and month 1-12 after start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment, respectively; response being defined as achieving at least two FBG values ≤ 110 mg/dL (≤ 6.1 mmol/L) within the respective observational period. Response rates were summarized with frequency distribution and, in addition, adjusted frequency distribution considering only patients with nonmissing data. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to Clopper-Pearson were calculated.
Secondary outcome measuresUnless stated otherwise, measured at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months:
1. Absolute change in HbA1c [%]
2. Absolute change in fasting blood glucose (FBG) [mg/dL]
3. Response rate 6 and 12 months after start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment defined by:
3.1. Either reaching two FBG values ≤110 mg/dL (≤6.1 mmol/L) or at least once the predefined individual HbA1c target value
3.2. Reaching at least one HbA1c value [%] equal or less to the predefined individual HbA1c target value
3.3. Reaching two FBG values ≤110 mg/dL (≤6.1 mmol/L) and at least once the predefined individual HbA1c target value
4. Time from start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment to response for each of the response endpoints (see definitions above, including primary efficacy parameter) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Reaching a response criterion for the first time was considered as event in these analyses. Response in FBG required at least two values ≤110 mg/dL (≤6.1mmol/L) whereas start of response was defined at the first occurrence. Patients without response were censored at the date of last measurement of FBG or HbA1c, respectively. Median time to response and corresponding 95% CI were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, cumulative incidence curves were produced.
5. Duration (persistence) of response for each of the response endpoints (see definitions above, including primary efficacy parameter) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Only patients with documented response and valid duration time (not missing, not negative) were included in these analyses. End of response was defined as one of the following (depending on endpoint definition):
5.1. The second FBG value >110 mg/dL (>6.1 mmol/L) after start of FBG response
5.2. The first HbA1c value [%] above the predefined individual target
5.3. Change to another form of insulin therapy or change of basal insulin
Patients without documented end of response were censored at the date of last measurement of FBG or HbA1c, respectively. Median duration of response and corresponding 95% CI were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, Kaplan-Meier curves were produced.
6. Incidences and event rates per patient year were calculated for symptomatic, confirmed symptomatic, nocturnal, severe, and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia as reported in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). Confirmation of symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) measurement ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L). Severe hypoglycemia was defined as necessity of the assistance of another person or a SMBG measurement of ≤56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L). Nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as hypoglycemia occurring during the night (approximately 10pm-6am), while the patient was asleep (symptomatic or confirmed by SMBG measurement ≤70 mg/dL [≤3.9 mmol/L]). Severe nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as those nocturnal hypoglycemia fulfilling the definition of a severe hypoglycemia. 95% CIs for incidence rates were calculated according to Clopper-Pearson. Rates per patient year were calculated as cumulative number of hypoglycemic events for all patients divided by the cumulative duration of insulin glargine 300 U/mL therapy in years, whereas patients with missing treatment duration or missing number of hypoglycemic events were excluded. Details for calculation are provided in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP).
7. Absolute change in the 4-point blood glucose profile [mg/dL]
8. Absolute change in body weight [kg]
9. Absolute change in daily insulin doses (number of units per day and number of units per kg body weight [BW] per day) and number of dose modifications per visits; baseline and monthly documentation until month 12.
10. Values and absolute changes for blood lipids [mg/dL] (triglycerides, high-density Lipoprotein [HDL], low-density Lipoprotein [LDL] and total cholesterol)
11. Type of LLT overall and by LDL subgroups (<70 mg/dL, <100 mg/dL, 100-190 mg/dL, >190 mg/dL at respective visit). An intensification of LLT was defined as administration of an additional LLT drug compared to baseline, or a higher dosing of statin, i.e. change from moderate at one visit to intensive at a following visit
Overall study start date30/10/2014
Completion date27/12/2017

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants3000
Key inclusion criteria1. Patients with type 2 diabetes (basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs) with any basal insulin except insulin glargine 300 U/mL
2. Adults and seniors: age at least 18 years, no upper age limit
3. HbA1c between 7.5% to 10.0%
4. Fasting blood glucose > 130 mg/dL
5. Ability and willingness to perform blood glucose self-monitoring
Key exclusion criteria1. Type 1 diabetes
2. Contraindications for therapy with insulin glargine 300 U/mL
3. Existing insulin therapy with basal and bolus Insulin (i.e. basal-bolus insulin therapy, premixed insulin therapy)
4. Patients with known cancer disease
5. Pregnancy
6. Drug or alcohol abuse
7. Dementia or general incapacity to understand the content of the observational study
Date of first enrolment12/06/2015
Date of final enrolment31/12/2016

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Austria
  • Germany
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

University of Freiburg
Prof. Dr. Jochen Seufert
Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology
Department of Medicine II
Medical Center
Faculty of Medicine
Hugstetter Strasse 55
Freiburg
D-79106
Germany

Sponsor information

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Industry

Potsdamer Str. 8
Berlin
D-10785
Germany

Phone +49 (0)30 2575 2502
Email Cornelia.Dorn@sanofi.com
Website https://www.sanofi.de/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03ytdtb31

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/04/2020
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planFull publications planned in high-impact peer-reviewed journals:
1. Full publication planned for Q3 2019
2. Full paper on subgroup analyses (age groups, responder) are planned for the beginning of 2020
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available on reasonable request from Katrin Pegelow (Katrin.Pegelow@sanofi.com) and Cornelia Dorn (Cornelia.Dorn@sanofi.com).

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Abstract results conference abstract 01/04/2016 No No
Abstract results conference abstract 26/04/2018 No No
Abstract results conference abstract 01/05/2018 No No
Results article 01/12/2018 19/04/2021 Yes No
Results article 13/09/2021 09/08/2022 Yes No
Protocol file version 2.0 21/04/2015 27/09/2022 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN56991780 Protocol v2.0 21Apr2015.pdf

Editorial Notes

27/09/2022: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file.
09/08/2022: Publication reference added.
19/04/2021: Publication reference added.
14/02/2020: The intention to publish date was changed from 16/08/2019 to 01/04/2020.
03/07/2019: Trial's existence confirmed by ethics committee.