A Randomised, Prospective, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Continuous Infusion Ankle Block Compared to Standard Single Bolus Block in the Management of Postoperative Pain Following Foot and Ankle Surgery
ISRCTN | ISRCTN57941461 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57941461 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N0360177161 |
- Submission date
- 29/09/2006
- Registration date
- 29/09/2006
- Last edited
- 11/10/2011
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mr James Calder
Scientific
Scientific
North Hampshire Hospital NHS Trust
Aldermaston Road
Basingstoke
RG24 9NA
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 01256 313156 |
---|---|
j.calder@ic.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Randomised prospective double blinded placebo controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Not specified |
Study type | Treatment |
Scientific title | |
Study objectives | To assess the effectiveness of a single administration (bolus) of local anaesthetic to the nerves that supply the foot and ankle versus a bolus and continuous infusion of local anaesthetic to the same nerves in order to manage post operative pain following foot and ankle surgery. |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Surgery: Foot and ankle |
Intervention | Continuous infusion ankle block vs standard single bolus block. Intention to treat analysis will be used. The outcomes of the two treatment groups will be evaluated using two-sample t tests, with 95% confidence intervals reported for the difference in means. Secondary binary outcomes will also be analysed using two sample t tests, but using a significance level of 1%. All analyses will be adjusted (using linear regression) for confounding variables that may differ by chance between the treatment groups. Stata for Windows (StataCorp, USA) will be the statistical package of choice. |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Mean patient visual analogue pain scores over 72 hours post-operatively. |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Time to mobilise 2. Time to discharge |
Overall study start date | 01/06/2006 |
Completion date | 01/06/2007 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Not Specified |
Target number of participants | 56 |
Key inclusion criteria | Patients undergoing ankle and hindfoot surgery. |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Dementia 2. Peripheral neuropathy |
Date of first enrolment | 01/06/2006 |
Date of final enrolment | 01/06/2007 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
North Hampshire Hospital NHS Trust
Basingstoke
RG24 9NA
United Kingdom
RG24 9NA
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health
Government
Government
The Department of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)20 7307 2622 |
---|---|
dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk | |
Website | http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en |
Funders
Funder type
Government
North Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
No information available
NHS R&D Support Funding
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/12/2010 | Yes | No |