A Randomised, Prospective, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Continuous Infusion Ankle Block Compared to Standard Single Bolus Block in the Management of Postoperative Pain Following Foot and Ankle Surgery

ISRCTN ISRCTN57941461
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57941461
Secondary identifying numbers N0360177161
Submission date
29/09/2006
Registration date
29/09/2006
Last edited
11/10/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr James Calder
Scientific

North Hampshire Hospital NHS Trust
Aldermaston Road
Basingstoke
RG24 9NA
United Kingdom

Phone +44 01256 313156
Email j.calder@ic.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised prospective double blinded placebo controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of a single administration (bolus) of local anaesthetic to the nerves that supply the foot and ankle versus a bolus and continuous infusion of local anaesthetic to the same nerves in order to manage post operative pain following foot and ankle surgery.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: Foot and ankle
InterventionContinuous infusion ankle block vs standard single bolus block.

Intention to treat analysis will be used. The outcomes of the two treatment groups will be evaluated using two-sample t tests, with 95% confidence intervals reported for the difference in means. Secondary binary outcomes will also be analysed using two sample t tests, but using a significance level of 1%. All analyses will be adjusted (using linear regression) for confounding variables that may differ by chance between the treatment groups. Stata for Windows (StataCorp, USA) will be the statistical package of choice.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureMean patient visual analogue pain scores over 72 hours post-operatively.
Secondary outcome measures1. Time to mobilise
2. Time to discharge
Overall study start date01/06/2006
Completion date01/06/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants56
Key inclusion criteriaPatients undergoing ankle and hindfoot surgery.
Key exclusion criteria1. Dementia
2. Peripheral neuropathy
Date of first enrolment01/06/2006
Date of final enrolment01/06/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

North Hampshire Hospital NHS Trust
Basingstoke
RG24 9NA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health
Government

The Department of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Government

North Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)

No information available

NHS R&D Support Funding

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2010 Yes No