Steroid injection versus surgical decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN59894749 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN59894749 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | 19860 |
- Submission date
- 20/07/2016
- Registration date
- 20/07/2016
- Last edited
- 22/04/2021
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Nervous System Diseases
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) the most common nerve compression disorder. It is happens because one of the central nerves in the wrist (median nerve) is compressed, leading to tingling, numbness and pain in the hand, particularly at night. Patients usually report that the night symptoms are the most troublesome as the pain can be unrelenting and sleep can be disturbed every night. Mild cases are treated with wrist splints and steroid injection. Severe nerve compression may require an operation to decompress the nerve however. Both injection and surgery are used for moderate cases but there is no clear evidence as to which is best. Some clinicians argue that all patients should receive an injection first, reserving the more expensive and invasive surgery for when this fails. Others offer early surgery, arguing that around 80% of injections fail within one year and that surgery is effective and safe. As a result, there is variation in practice across the country in the management of moderate CTS and there are no national guidelines. Commissioners’ policies for funding surgery also vary greatly. A large study is going to be developed in order to compare early surgery with injection and surgery later if required, looking at the effectiveness, safety and cost of both approaches. In order to assess whether a study of this nature is possible it is necessary to perform a smaller version of the study (pilot study) which will assess the willingness of patients to participate and identify any difficulties that the larger study may encounter.
Who can participate?
Adults with CTS which is disturbing their sleep or limiting their ability to use their hand who have found wearing night splints to be ineffective.
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in the first group receive a steroid injection into the carpal tunnel. The injection is given by a qualified and experienced health care professional and can be done at the same time as the patient joins the study to save any further appointments or delay. Often patients do not require any further treatment after an injection however if the symptoms come back, they can contact the local research team at any stage to discuss whether they should have surgery. Those in the second group undergo a small operation to relieve pressure on the nerve (decompression surgery). The surgery takes around 10 minutes and is usually done under local anaesthetic (injection to numb the hand). Participants in both groups complete a number of questionnaires at the start of the study and then after 3, 6 and 12 months to find out if their symptoms have improved. After 12 months, the number of participants who were eligible, agreed to take part, and completed all follow up is recorded to find out whether conducting a larger trial would be possible.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no guaranteed benefits to patients who take part in this study although they may find the treatment approach they are allocated to receive improves their symptoms. There are no anticipated risks to participating in this study. Whichever type of treatment patients are allocated to, their care will be coordinated by a competent and trained health care professional. Both treatments have a very low risk of complications, although clearly surgery does carry more risk than an injection. These will be explained to the patient as part of routine care. Steps are always taken to ensure that these risks are minimised.
Where is the study run from?
Gloucester Royal Hospital (lead centre), Derriford Hospital and Kent & Canterbury Hospital (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
February 2014 to October 2017
Who is funding the study?
The British Society for Surgery of the Hand (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Mrs Cushla Cooper
cushla.cooper@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Contact information
Public
Surgical Intervention Trials Unit
Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences
Botnar Research Centre
University of Oxford
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
Windmill Road
Oxford
OX3 7HE
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)1865 737643 |
|---|---|
| cushla.cooper@ndorms.ox.ac.uk |
Study information
| Study design | Randomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment, Drug, Surgery |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Injection or Decompression in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - Pilot Study (INDICATE-P) |
| Study acronym | INDICATE-P |
| Study objectives | The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a study assessing whether a steroid injection given initially is better than having surgery for patients with moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. |
| Ethics approval(s) | East Midlands - Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee, 23/07/2015, ref: 15/EM/0298 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Specialty: Musculoskeletal disorders, Primary sub-specialty: Metabolic bone disease |
| Intervention | Participants are randomised to one of two groups using a web-based randomisation system will be provided by the Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit (OCTRU). A computer will generate the random sequence which will be simple block randomisation, stratified by centre to ensure a similar number of patients are allocated to each treatment arm at each site. Randomisation will take place once the patient has consented and all baseline data is collected. Group 1: Participants receive a steroid injection at baseline. The technique of the injection will not be standardised but the practitioner should regularly give injections for CTS and use the technique with which they are most familiar. Further injections are not advisable whilst the patient is in the study, however, if more than one injection is given, this needs to be recorded as further treatment sort on the Complication Form. Group 2: Participants receive decompression surgery. Participating surgeons will use the technique with which they are most familiar, whether it is open or endoscopic surgery, to avoid any learning curve effect. Peri-operative management including anaesthesia, analgesia and dressings should follow local protocols. Post-operative management including dressing changes, advice, exercises, scar management and follow up appointments should follow local protocols or the surgeon’s preference. Specifically, it will not be necessary to have a follow-up appointment in secondary care, if that is not usual local practice. All participants will be followed up clinically as per routine care at their hospital. For the study purposes they will be followed up with postal questionnaires at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation in order to assess clinical differences between the two treatment options. This includes assessments on pain, function and quality of life |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | Feasibility outcomes: 1. Eligibility rate is measured by recruitment numbers and screening logs during the recruitment phase 2. Recruitment rate is measured by the number of patients randomised to the trial and over what period of time 3. Adherance rate is measured by the number of withdrawals and losses to follow up over the 12 month period of the follow up process |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Pain and function is measured using the Carpal Tunnel Assessment Questionnaire at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months 2. Pain is measured using the Palmar Pain scale at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months 3. Quality of Life is measured using the Global Outcome Scale and the EuroQol- 5D at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months 4. How satisfied patients are with their treatment outcome is measured using the Satisfaction Scale at 6, 12 months 5. Time off work/activities is measured by patient reports on resources use, complications and any further treatment sought at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Overall study start date | 13/02/2014 |
| Completion date | 31/10/2017 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | Planned Sample Size: 40; UK Sample Size: 40 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. All three of the following must be present: 1.1. Intermittent paraesthesia in median nerve distribution 1.2. Nocturnal hypoaesthesia, dysaesthesia or paraesthesia (including on waking) 1.3. A positive provocation test (e.g. Tinel’s, Phalen’s, Durkin’s pressure or hand elevation test) 2. Symptoms present for at least 3 months 3. Patients’ symptoms must either: 3.1. Disturb their sleep 3.2. Limit their ability to perform work or activities of daily living 4. Patients must have failed a trial of night splints for at least 2 weeks 5. Age >18 years |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Severe CTS 1.1. Thenar muscle wasting or 1.2. Continuously reduced light touch sensation in median nerve distribution (compared to opposite unaffected side or unaffected finger) 2. Previous carpal tunnel surgery or steroid injection (either side) 3. CTS secondary to: 3.1. Wrist deformity, trauma or mass 3.2. Pregnancy 3.3. Hypothyroidism 3.4. Inflammatory arthropathy 4. Clinical or neurophysiological evidence of polyneuropathy or cervical radiculopathy 5. Other symptomatic disorder in the affected hand diagnosed in the last 6 months or requiring treatment. 6. Patients in whom the baseline questionnaire cannot be completed due to cognitive difficulties |
| Date of first enrolment | 24/11/2015 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/09/2016 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centres
Great Western Road
Gloucester
GL1 3NN
United Kingdom
Derriford Road
Crownhill
Plymouth
PL6 8DH
United Kingdom
Ethelbert Road
Canterbury
CT1 3NG
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
Gloucestershire Research Support Service
Leadon House
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
Great Western Road
Gloucester
GL1 3NN
England
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)300 422 5463 |
|---|---|
| mark.walker@glos.nhs.uk | |
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/04mw34986 |
Funders
Funder type
Charity
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 31/10/2018 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication of the manuscript of the pilot study results once all follow up is completed, all data queries addressed, and the study team have reviewed the manuscript. Results will also be presented at national meetings of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol article | protocol | 24/04/2017 | Yes | No | |
| Other publications | letter | 01/11/2020 | 22/04/2021 | Yes | No |
| HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No |
Editorial Notes
22/04/2021: Publication reference added.
11/10/2018: Internal review
03/05/2017: Publication reference added.
