ISRCTN ISRCTN60260702
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN60260702
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 06/80/01; Version 1
Submission date
05/06/2008
Registration date
14/07/2008
Last edited
24/09/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Andrew Clark
Scientific

Academic Cardiology
Castle Hill Hospital
Castle Road
Cottingham
HU16 5JQ
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designProspective four-arm multicentre randomised feasibility study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Home
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleDoes home oxygen therapy (HOT) in addition to standard care improve disease severity and symptoms in chronic heart failure?
Study acronymNEON
Study objectivesWhat is the role of home oxygen therapy (HOT) in the management of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)? To address the current uncertainties in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV chronic heart failure with regard to the place of oxygen therapy in their management. This is a feasibility study (Stage 1) conducted in preparation for the main (Stage 2) randomised controlled trial.

On 10/09/2009 the overall trial start and end dates were updated from 01/09/2008 and 01/12/2009 to 01/01/2010 and 31/12/2010, respectively.

On 05/07/2013 the overall trial end date was updated from 31/12/2010 to 01/01/2015.
Ethics approval(s)Northern and Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee, 24/08/2009, ref: 09/H0903/42
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedHeart failure
InterventionThe participants will be randomised to receive HOT as nocturnal oxygen therapy (NOT) or long-term oxygen treatment (LTOT). Once randomised to one of the two modes of oxygen delivery, there will be a second randomisation to active oxygen therapy or sham (placebo) therapy. This stage of the study will be double-blind. The first and second randomisations will each be in 1:1 ratio.

Total duration of interventions: 3 months
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTo assess the feasibility of the proposed randomised control trial in the following regard:
1. Prevalence of hypoxaemia in patients with NYHA III/IV and optimal medical therapy. Assessment of arterial oxygenation by:
1.1. Arterial saturation by pulse oximetry at baseline and at the completion of the 6 minute walk test
1.2. Overnight oximetry using the Embletta® to record (i) nadir of oxygenation overnight (ii) proportion of night time spent with oxygen saturation below 95%
2. Recruitment and retention of study patients and their compliance with trial intervention. Criteria for proceeding to the larger RCT phase of the study:
2.1. Recruitment rate >= 3 patients per week per centre during the recruitment phase
2.2. Drop out rate (excluding deaths) of <= 15% at 3 months
2.3. Compliance >= 27%
Number of hours of oxygen used will be measured by concentrator meter and patient diaries.
3. The value of the intervention for a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLwHF) quality of life questionnaire scores at baseline, 1 and 3 months.
4. To develop a cost-effectiveness model of HOT based on existing evidence (to asses the likely benefit of proceeding to the larger RCT phase of the study)
5. Expected value of perfect information (EVPI) associated with the data to be collected in the proposed trial, that is, whether the patient benefits from the improvement in treatment decisions possible with the additional information provided by the trial is worth the cost of undertaking a definitive clinical trial of this intervention. To use this to inform the design of the subsequent main trial.
Secondary outcome measures1. To assess the effect of HOT delivered as NOT or LTOT on the following:
1.1. Symptoms (total duration of follow-up: 3 months):
a. Assessed using the results of standard biochemistry tests
b. 6 minute walk test
c. Prevalence of hypoxaemia results
d. Validated Borg score and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for breathlessness (average and worse over past 24 hours and current level)
d. Change in validated Karnofsky performance scale of physical activity
e. Epworth Sleepiness score to assess daytime somnolence
f. Co-morbidity measured by the Charlson co-morbidity index
1.2. Quality of life, as measured by MLWHF, Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) (mood assessment) and EuroQoL questionnaires at baseline, 1 and 3 months
1.3. Disease severity in patients with CHF, as measured by the validated Borg score and NRS for breathlessness (average and worse over past 24 hours and current level). Total duration of follow-up: 3 months
2. To assess the cost-effectiveness of HOT (see 3 in Primary outcome measures)
3. To assess the acceptability to patients and carers of study intervention and placebo device (Patient diary at enrolment, 1 and 3 months)
4. To assess the acceptability of the placebo device to clinicians (through communications with the research teams)
Overall study start date01/01/2010
Completion date01/01/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants48
Key inclusion criteria1. Both males and females, aged 18 years or over
2. Heart failure grade NYHA III/IV with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction confirmed by echocardiography. The left ventricular ejection fraction must be less than 40% or graded as at least "moderately" impaired on visual inspection if an accurate ejection fraction cannot be calculated
3. Heart failure from any aetiology
4. Maximally tolerated medical management of their heart failure
5. Provided written informed consent and able to complete patient assessments
Key exclusion criteriaPatients who:
1. Are unable to provide informed consent
2. Are unable to complete patient related information on entry
3. Have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) likely to fulfil criteria for long-term oxygen treatment (LTOT); forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <70% and FEV1 <40% predicted and hypoxia (pO2 <7.3 kPa or saturations <90%)
4. Have co-existing malignant disease if this would affect the study in the investigators' opinion
5. Patients with persistent basal pulmonary crackles found to have interstitial lung disease
6. Unwilling or unable to comply with safety regulations regarding oxygen use, particularly smoking
Date of first enrolment01/01/2010
Date of final enrolment01/01/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Castle Hill Hospital
Cottingham
HU16 5JQ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Hull (UK)
University/education

c/o Jonathan Cant
Venn Building
Cottingham Road
Hull
HU6 7RX
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.hull.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04nkhwh30

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2015 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No