Central venous blood gas and cardiac output
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN60931121 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN60931121 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | 10/H0907/44 |
- Submission date
- 26/06/2011
- Registration date
- 24/01/2012
- Last edited
- 28/02/2018
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Infections and Infestations
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Severe sepsis or septic shock occurs when your blood pressure drops to a dangerously low level after an infection. Treatment involves giving fluids through a vein and giving drugs that increase the volume of blood pumped by the heart (cardiac output). Doctors often need to know about the effect of a treatment on the cardiac output, but measuring the cardiac output requires expensive equipment. In all seriously ill patients a tube is inserted into a large vein in the chest (called a central venous catheter) to measure the blood pressure in the central veins and for giving drugs. The levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the central venous blood can be measured from the blood samples taken from the central venous catheter. In this study we want to find out whether changes in the levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide could be used to assess changes in cardiac output without the need for expensive equipment.
Who can participate?
Patients aged over 18 admitted to the ICU with sepsis.
What does the study involve?
All patients receive standard resuscitation treatment after being admitted to the ICU. Fluids, red blood cells and drugs are given to maintain blood pressure. A catheter is inserted into an artery to determine the cardiac output. If a patient is likely to increase cardiac output in response to fluids, fluids are given accordingly. Blood samples for blood gas analysis are drawn simultaneously from the arterial and central venous line (2 ml each). Three consecutive measurements of blood oxygen and carbon dioxide levels are performed and the average is calculated and used for further statistical analysis. Immediately after any series of blood samples cardiac output is recorded. Another set of blood samples is taken and cardiac output is measured again after the intervention to increase cardiac output is finished
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration
Where is the study run from?
James Cook University Hospital (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2010 to October 2011
Who is funding the study?
James Cook University Hospital and NIHR Clinical Research Network Flexibility & Sustainability Funding (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Jost Mullenheim
Contact information
Scientific
Intensive Care Unit
James Cook University Hospital
Marton Road
Middlesbrough
TS4 3BW
United Kingdom
Study information
| Study design | Single centre trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Observational |
| Secondary study design | Cohort study |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Can changes in central venous oxygen saturation and central venous - arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide difference predict changes in cardiac output in septic patients? |
| Study objectives | We hypothesise that the trend in cerebrovascular accident (CVA): partial pressure of CO2 in blood (pCO2) difference and/or central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) in response to interventions targeted to increase CO can be used to assess changes in CO. This will be investigated in 28 septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in which CO monitoring is deemed necessary. The results of this trial will inform the basis for further studies. Septic shock is one of the most common reasons for ICU admission. Instead of targeting a specific central venous pressure (CVP), the goal in early fluid resuscitation of patients with septic shock should be rather to optimise flow-related parameters and thus oxygen delivery in line with the recommendation given in the latest guidelines for the treatment of sepsis. Aiming for predefined absolute values of ScvO2 is unreliable given the large limits of agreements between ScvO2 in critically ill patients and the possibility of ongoing tissue hypoxia despite normal ScvO2 values. Thus, an alternative approach of resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock might be to titrate fluids/inotropes to achieve the individual maximum ScvO2 and/or lowest central venous-arterial pCO2 difference. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee, 07/09/2010, ref: 10/H0907/44 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Sepsis |
| Intervention | 1. Most patients participating in the study will be mentally incapacitated due to the influence of strong sedating drugs and underlying critical illness 2. Before the incapacitated patient is enrolled, we will seek consent from a personal consultee and a no objection form will be obtained in line with the Mental Capacity Act 3. We will also enquire about any objection through a registered lasting power of attorney for medical affairs or an advance decision precluding research. If the enrolled patient survives, he/she will be approached for retrospective consent to remain within the study 4. All patients will receive standard resuscitation treatment after being admitted to ICU as per current international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 5. Briefly, during the initial resuscitation period (first 6 h) resuscitation goals are CVP 8-12mmHg (> 12 mmHg if mechanically ventilated), mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg, urine output ≥0.5 ml/kg/h] 6. Fluid boluses, red blood cells and dobutamine will be given accordingly 7. Further support consists of further fluid challenges using crystalloids or colloids to maintain CVP, if hypovolaemia is suspected or if haemodynamic improvement is observed in response to fluid challenges 8. Vasopressors are given to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg (noradrenaline and additional vasopressin if no response to noradrenaline) 9. Dobutamine is started if cardiac filling pressures are elevated and CO is low 10. Advanced haemodynamic monitoring (PiCCO2®, Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Germany) is considered if despite these interventions haemodynamic stability is not achieved and lactate levels remain elevated 11. A catheter will be inserted in the brachial, axillary or femoral artery 12. SV and hence CO will be determined by transpulmonary thermodilution technique using three measurements obtained by injection of iced glucose 5% through the central line randomly throughout the respiratory cycle 13. The PiCCO2® system is a validated accurate monitor measuring SV, SVV and PPV even in rapidly changing circulatory conditions and in patients with reduced heart function 14. These parameters are continuously calculated over a 30 seconds rolling period and displayed on the monitor 15. PPV will be calculated according to the following formula (PiCCO2): 15.1. PPV (%) = (PPmax-PPmin)/(PPmax+PPmin)/2x100, where PPmax and PPmin are the maximal and minimal values of pulse pressure over a respiratory cycle, respectively 16. SVV will be calculated according to the following formula (PiCCO2): 16.1. SVV (%) = (SVmax-SVmin)/(SVmax+SVmin)/2x100, where SVmax and SVmin are the maximal and minimal values of SV over a respiratory cycle, respectively 17. PPV and SVV will be used in patients who are intubated, mechanically ventilated with a tidal volume of at least 8 ml/kg estimated ideal body weight with no spontaneous breathing activity and who are in sinus rhythm to predict whether a patient is likely to increase CO in response to a fluid challenge (= fluid responsiveness) 18. The mean threshold to differentiate responders from non-responders in septic patients is 13 % for PPV and 11 % for SVV, respectively 19. A fluid bolus (250-500ml Gelofusin) will be given accordingly unless contraindications for a fluid challenge are present (PaO2/FiO2 less than 13.3 kPa, hydrostatic pulmonary oedema on chest X-ray) 20. In non-ventilated patients, ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity, ventilation with tidal volumes < 8ml/kg or in patients with significant arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, multiple ventricular/supraventricular extra beats) we will use passive leg raising (PLR from the 45º semi-recumbent position, to predict fluid responsiveness. 21. In these conditions Monnet and coworkers have shown that an increase in CO of at least 10% measured by the PiCCO during PLR enables a diagnosis of a positive response to fluid administration with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100% 22. This study has also shown that the PiCCO system can be reliably used to assess the haemodynamic response to PLR. Thus, PLR induced changes of CO measured with the PiCCO monitor will be used as an ideal screening manoeuvre to decide whether the patient requires ongoing fluid resuscitation in situations where PPV and SVV have been shown to be unreliable (e.g. spontaneous breathing activity, arrhythmias) 23. PLR raising will be performed every 2 h within the first 24 h after admission and every 6h thereafter 24. In any patient in whom an intervention to increase CO is planned (e.g. application of fluid bolus, start/increase of inotrope dose) blood samples for blood gas analysis will be drawn simultaneously from the arterial and central venous line (2 ml each). 25. Three consecutive measurements of ScvO2, central venous and arterial pCO2 will be performed and the average will be calculated and used for further statistical analysis 26. Immediately after any series of blood samples SV and hence CO, PPV and SVV will be recorded. Another set of lood samples will be taken and measurement of CO will again be performed after the intervention targeted to increase CO is finished (10 min after start/change of inotrope dose, immediately after fluid bolus has been given) |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | The correlation between changes of cardiac output with changes in central venous saturation and central venous arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide difference, respectively |
| Secondary outcome measures | Sensitivity and specificity of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation to predict an increase in cardiac output by at least 10% |
| Overall study start date | 01/10/2010 |
| Completion date | 01/10/2011 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 28 patients |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. 28 Adult patients (>18 years old) 2. Have severe sepsis or septic shock, as defined by the International Sepsis Definitions Conference (Levy MM et al, 2003) 3. Are equipped with both arterial and central line 4. In whom CO monitoring and an intervention to increase stroke volume (SV) and hence CO (e.g. fluid bolus, inotropes) is deemed necessary |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. No consent: objection from somebody close who is willing to be consulted about the appropriateness of the patient being enrolled in the study in line with the Mental Capacity Act objection through registered lasting power of attorney for medical affairs advance ecision precluding research retrospective withdrawal of consent 2. Pregnancy 3. Age below 18 years |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/10/2010 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/10/2011 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
TS4 3BW
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
c/o Ms Julie Rowbotham
James Cook University Hospital
Marton Road
Middlesbrough
TS4 3BW
England
United Kingdom
| Website | http://www.southtees.nhs.uk/live/?a=1799 |
|---|---|
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/02vqh3346 |
Funders
Funder type
Hospital/treatment centre
No information available
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
20/01/2016: Plain English summary added
28/02/2018: No publications found in PubMed.
