Study to evaluate pain in split skin graft donor sites dressed with fibrin sealant (Tisseel®, Baxter) and adhesive dressings versus adhesive dressings directly applied to the donor site

ISRCTN ISRCTN61225564
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN61225564
Secondary identifying numbers GSTT R&D registration number RJ1080009
Submission date
02/03/2011
Registration date
11/11/2011
Last edited
06/08/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Ciaran Healy
Scientific

Consultant Plastic Surgeon
St Thomas' Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised active control parallel assignment
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA prospective, controlled, randomised study to evaluate pain in split skin graft donor sites dressed with fibrin sealant (Tisseel®, Baxter) and adhesive dressings versus adhesive dressings directly applied to the donor site
Study objectivesFibrin sealant significantly reduces pain in split skin graft donor sites
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval obtained from Guys and St Thomas' Ethics Committee on 11th January 2008, ref: 06Q0701/92
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPain in split skin graft donor sites
InterventionA prospective, randomised controlled trial was performed. The self-adhesive fabric dressing Mefix® (Mölnlycke Health Care Ltd) was used as a control and compared to fibrin glue spray (Tisseel®, Baxter Healthcare Ltd) plus Mefix®.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureDaily pain and disability scores from day 1 to 14 post-operatively using a Visual Analogue Scale
Secondary outcome measures1. Length of hospital stay
2. Duration of requirement for dressings
Overall study start date11/01/2008
Completion date31/12/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants50
Key inclusion criteria1. 18 years old and over
2. Conscious during post operative period
3. Small to moderate area of split skin graft (SSG) procedure necessary
4. Lateral thigh SSG donor site preferable
Key exclusion criteria1. Hypersensitivity to beef or beef products ((Tisseel® is produced from bovine aprotonin)
2. Those requiring thicker grafts, greater than 8/1000 inch
3. Thigh donor sites unavailable. Back and buttocks can be used as donor sites in certain cases, they may have a different pain profile
4. Known immunodeficiency will have an effect on healing
5. Mental incapacity to consent or undertake questionnaire
6. Concurrently participating in another clinical trial and having received another investigational drug or device within the last 30 days to avoid confounding factors
7. Alternative source of severe distracting pain which may down score donor site pain
Date of first enrolment11/01/2008
Date of final enrolment31/12/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Consultant Plastic Surgeon
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Consultant Plastic Surgeon
c/o Mr Ciaran Healy (Principal Investigator)
Department of Plastic Surgery
St Thomas' Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00j161312

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital (UK) - Plastic Surgery Academic Fund

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2013 Yes No