ISRCTN ISRCTN62748772
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN62748772
Secondary identifying numbers HTA Project: 10/66/01
Submission date
06/04/2012
Registration date
12/04/2012
Last edited
30/01/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Peter Scanlon
Scientific

Gloucestershire Diabetic Retinopathy Research Group
Office above Oakley Ward
Cheltenham General Hospital
Sandford Road
Cheltenham
GL53 7AN
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-8513-710X

Study information

Study designA primary research study using routinely collected clinical data to model the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of variable screening intervals.
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCross-section survey
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeScreening
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleDevelopment of a cost-effectiveness model for optimization of the screening interval in diabetic retinopathy screening
Study acronymCODES
Study objectivesStudy aims:
1. Use demographic and routinely collected clinical information from 15000 patients in 85 Gloucestershire GP practices to develop a risk score for each patient and to identify patient groups whose risk of retinopathy progression is low and whose screening interval can be safely extended
2. Model what the influence of the grading classification error is on over referrals and under referrals and how that influence changes over time, taking into account sequential grading results and hospital outcome results, comparing screening intervals that vary according to risk score against current standard practice (annual screening intervals for all patients) and other fixed-interval approaches.
3. Extend our results to multi-ethnic populations using a dataset of 2000 Asians and 5000 Caucasians from Coventry and Warwickshire and a South London dataset of 2000 people with diabetes including 700 people of African Caribbean origin. Grading results can be made available from these datasets for at least a 3 year period. The risk score and algorithm will be tested against retinopathy grades in the two datasets where follow-up data is available
4. Determine if assigning diabetic patients to differing diabetic retinopathy screening intervals using a risk estimation model is cost-effective when compared to current practice, which is annual screening of all eligible patients with diabetes
5. Estimate the economic benefits if personalised screening intervals were to be applied to the National Screening Programme in England
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDiabetic Retinopathy
InterventionThe Health Technology being assessed is a variable screening interval based on risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) assessed using two field digital photographs after pupil dilation as used in the English National Screening Programme (ENSPDR) and other available clinical data.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureA risk-based algorithm for screening interval
Secondary outcome measures1. Years of sight saved
2. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained
3. Key recommendations for further research
Overall study start date01/05/2012
Completion date01/05/2014

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participantsTotal 24,000 -15,000 in Gloucestershire, 7000 from Coventry including 2000 Asians and 2000 from South London including 700 people of Afro-Caribbean origin .
Key inclusion criteria1. Participants over the age of 12 years
2. Diagnosed with diabetes and have attended a diabetic retinopathy screening programme in one of the study areas of Gloucestershire, Coventry and Warwickshire, South London and Nottingham.
3. Have been sent the required information about transfer of risk factor data as advised by the Department of Health funded GP2DRS (‘General Practice to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening’) Project and they would have been given the opportunity to inform their General Practice or Screening Programme that they did not want their risk factor data transferred.
4. The participants in this study are pseudoanonymised data on those people who have attended for screening and risk factor data has been transferred according to the recommended guidelines of the GP2DRS project.
Key exclusion criteria1. People with diabetes under 12 years
2. Those who have not attended for screening
3. Those people who have indicated that they do not want their risk factor data transferred to the screening services.
Date of first enrolment01/05/2012
Date of final enrolment01/05/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Gloucestershire Diabetic Retinopathy Research Group
Cheltenham
GL53 7AN
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Mr Mark Walker
Trust Headquarters
1 College Lawn
Gloucestershire
Cheltenham
GL53 7AG
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.gloshospitals.org.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04mw34986

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK) ref: 10/66/01

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/12/2015
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2015 Yes No

Editorial Notes

30/01/2017: Publication reference added.