Breathlessness training: comparison of two programmes for Shortness Of Breath in Lung Cancer

ISRCTN ISRCTN62865905
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN62865905
Secondary identifying numbers Version 2
Submission date
13/02/2009
Registration date
05/03/2009
Last edited
17/03/2020
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Miriam Johnson
Scientific

St. Catherine's Hospice
Throxenby Lane
Scarborough
YO12 5RE
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designSingle centre randomised controlled non-blinded parallel group feasibility study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleNon-pharmacological management of breathlessness: a randomised controlled trial of different intensity training
Study acronymSOB-LC
Study objectivesTraining in breathlessness techniques in a programme of three sessions is more beneficial than training in a single session.
Ethics approval(s)Hull and East Riding Local Ethics Research Ethics Committee gave approval in January 2008 (ref: 07/Q1104/2)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedBreathlessness in patients with intrathoracic malignancy
InterventionLow intensity training programme:
Patients randomised to the low intensity arm will be taught four techniques of management of breathlessness at a single hour long session in a clinical setting appropriate to the needs of the patient by the therapist. They will be taught diaphragmatic breathing and pacing which require face-to-face demonstration. In addition, a brief introduction will be given to techniques to promote relaxation and manage anxiety. Written reinforcement in the form of information booklets plus verbal reinforcement in the format of the patients choice (tape, video or DVD) will be given to remind the patient of the techniques they have been taught.

One week later, the therapist will ring the patient to see if they have remembered to practise the techniques and if they have managed to watch/listen to the reinforcement information.

High intensity training programme:
Patients randomised to the high intensity arm will be taught the same four techniques of the management of breathlessness at a hour long single session in a clinical setting appropriate to the needs of the patient by the therapist. This will be followed by practice and reinforcement face-to-face with the therapist on two further occasions at weekly intervals.

Written reinforcement in the form of information booklets plus verbal reinforcement in the format of the patients choice (tape, video or DVD) will be given to remind the patient of the techniques they have been taught. One week after the final visit, the therapist will ring the patient to see if they have remembered to practise the techniques and if they have managed to watch/listen to the reinforcement information.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureRecruitment, retention and variability of breathlessness severity (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] worst breathlessness over last 24 hours)
Secondary outcome measures1. NRS average breathlessness over last 24 hours
2. NRS breathlessness "now"
3. NRS distress due to breathlessness
4. NRS coping with breathlessness
5. NRS satisfaction of care
6. Brief COPE
7. Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD)
8. Euroqol EQ-5D (EQ-5D)
9. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Overall study start date01/09/2007
Completion date30/09/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants40
Key inclusion criteria1. Intractable breathlessness resulting from primary or secondary malignant lung disease in the palliative setting where the underlying cause has been maximally treated
2. All identified reversible causes of the breathlessness have been treated if appropriate to do so, in the opinion of the attending clinician
3. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) greater than 40%
4. Aged greater than 18 years, either sex
5. Willingness to attend for breathlessness training
6. Ability to give informed consent
7. Expected prognosis of at least 3 months in the opinion of the attending clinician
Key exclusion criteria1. Inability to give informed consent
2. Intercurrent illness or co-morbidities making completion of the physiotherapy breathlessness course (PBC) course unlikely
3. Rapidly worsening breathlessness requiring urgent medical intervention
4. Palliative radiotherapy to chest in previous 4 weeks
5. Radical radiotherapy in previous 6 months
6. Chemotherapy or change in anti-cancer hormone treatment in previous 2 weeks
Date of first enrolment01/09/2007
Date of final enrolment30/09/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

St. Catherine's Hospice
Scarborough
YO12 5RE
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research and Development Department
2nd Floor, Daisy Building
Castle Hill Hospital
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Hull
HU16 5JQ
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1482 461903
Email james.illingworth@hey.nhs.uk
Website http://www.hey.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01b11x021

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Supportive and Palliative Care (SuPaC) Research Collaboration (UK) (ref: SuPaC CBG 15; awarded October 2006)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2010 Yes No

Editorial Notes

17/03/2020: Internal review.