ImmunoGlobulin administered SubCutaneously (SCIG) in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) over 12 months

ISRCTN ISRCTN63226217
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN63226217
EudraCT/CTIS number 2009-015242-30
Secondary identifying numbers 2009-001
Submission date
13/10/2010
Registration date
10/03/2011
Last edited
08/09/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Andreas Goebel
Scientific

Pain Relief
Clincial Sciences Centre
The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Lower Lane
Liverpool
L9 7LJ
United Kingdom

Email andreasgoebel@rocketmail.com

Study information

Study designOpen-label controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleAn open study to compare the efficacy of ImmunoGlobulin administered SubCutaneoulsy (SCIG) with current best practice in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
Study acronymSCIG in CRPS
Study objectivesTo ascertain the efficacy of repeated doses over one year of immune modulation treatment with a subcutaneous preparation of immunoglobulins (SCIG) in patients who had pain relief after a single-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment.

Please note that the participants of this trial have all taken part in a previous trial entitled: ‘Clinical response to intravenous immunoglobulin inpatients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)’ (see http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN63918259 for the ISRCTN record of this trial).
Ethics approval(s)Joint UCL/UCLH Ethics Committees of Human Research (Committee A), 24/09/2009, ref: 09/H0714/47
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedChronic Regional Pain Syndrome
InterventionThere are two groups. One gets SCIG and usual care (we call it best medical care, BMC) the other gets BMC only. Treatment duration is 12 months with follow ups at 18 and 24 months.

The SCIG group receive: a priming dose at 1 g/kg of Sandoglobulin® NF Liquid or Privigen® (intraveneously). A maintenance dose of 1 g/kg/month of Vivaglobulin is divided into weekly amounts and given subcutaneously. After 6 months the dose may be reduced 0.5 g/kg/month. After 3 months, if patients' relief is maintained the dose is further reduced by half to 0.25 g/kg/month for the remainder of the study (up to 12 months). Should patients experience increased pain following the dose reduction, the previous higher dose will be reinstated (0.5 or 1 g/kg/month).

BMC is recorded and monitored throughout. It is not possible to detail this as its dependent on patients' previous and current treatments but may include physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychology, pain management programme.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measurePain measured on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale. Changes in the mean pain score over a two-week period at baseline compared to mean pain score over a two-week period at the end of treatment.
Secondary outcome measures1. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) values before versus after treatment and after a continuous period of treatment, including sensory thresholds and allodynia values.
2. 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS) assessed daily throughout the study
3. Questionnaire booklet: completed monthly throughout the study to assess pain-related functioning, mood, quality of life and illness perceptions using the following validated questionnaires:
2.1. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
2.2. EuroQol-5D
2.3. Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)
2.4. Tampa Scale for Kinesaphobia (TSK)
2.5. Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS)
2.6. Perceived Adjustment to Chronic Illness Scale (PACIS) coping scale
2.7. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Overall study start date01/08/2010
Completion date01/08/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants12
Key inclusion criteria1. Intervention group:
1.1. Diagnosis of CRPS according to the 'Bruehl' criteria
1.2. Recruited from a previous RCT in London, responding better to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) than normal saline
1.3. At least a 24h average pain intensity of 6 over one week (one day of a lower pain intensity of 5 acceptable). Pain intensity must be judged as stable by the principal investigator (PI)
1.4. Patients and matched controls should have used routine medications before enrollment including gabapentin and/or pregabalin, duloxetin and/or venlaflaxine, a tricyclic antidepressant, lignocaine patches, both a strong and weak opioid in an appropriate dose without sufficient benefit.
1.5. Patients who wish not to follow recommendations of the trial team as to receiving concomitant treatment according to best medical care will nevertheless be suitable for enrollment.
1.6. Aged 18 years or over

2. Control group:
2.1. Selected from patients seen at the Walton Centre over the prior 18 months
2.2. Matched for:
2.2.1. Age +/10 years
2.2.2. Sex
2.2.3. Average 24 h pain intensity and acute limb activity related pain intensity +/2 points (but not below 5 on the NRS)
2.2.4. Disease duration +/18 months
Key exclusion criteria1. All patients (cases and controls):
1.1. Have evidence of significant organic disease on history or physical examination, which may be severe enough to prevent the patient from being able to complete the study
1.2 Suffer from another severe chronic pain syndrome such as fibromyalgia which may in the judgement of principle investigator hinder the appropriate assessment of pain from CRPS
1.3 Have a history of abuse or are currently abusing alcohol or drugs [using DSMIV criteria]
1.4. Have a psychiatric disorder which may in the judgement of the site investigator interfere with successful study participation
1.5. Are unwilling or not able to complete daily diaries
1.6. Do not understand the psychological questionnaires because appropriate validated translations into the patient's language are not available

2. Intervention group:
2.1. IgA serum levels within normal ranges. All patients in the SCIG group have already been tested for their IgA serum levels which were normal in all cases.
2.2. Patients with progressive renal failure and any patient requiring IVIG for another disorder
2.3. Treatment will be deferred in patients with an infection such as cold, flu or infected pressure sores until the infection has resolved because IG is contraindicated in cases of untreated bacterial infection
2.4. For the following patients in the SCIG group suitability for participation needs to be discussed with a specialist consultant:
2.4.1. Patients with compensated renal failure, patients suffering from epilepsy
2.4.2. Patients with a history of stroke or myocardial infarction
2.4.3. Patients with a known procoagulatory or bloodhyperviscosity disorder
2.4.4. Patients on loop diuretics
2.4.5. Patients with cancer other than basal cell carcinoma within the last 5 years. Those patients who have received definite treatment, such as curative surgery, with no known recurrence can be included without further discussion
Date of first enrolment01/08/2010
Date of final enrolment01/08/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Pain Relief
Liverpool
L9 7LJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Lower Lane
Fazakerley
Liverpool
L9 7LJ
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.thewaltomcente.nhs.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05cvxat96

Funders

Funder type

Industry

CSL Behring (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/11/2013 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No