Condition category
Circulatory System
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Retrospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Publication status
Results overdue

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Sudden cardiac arrest remains an important cause of potentially avoidable early death. Overall survival rates have not significantly changed over the last 20 years in many places. There is a need to investigate potential ways of improve survival following an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The ResQPOD Impedance Threshold Device (ITD) enhances circulation during resuscitation and has the potential to improve survival in OHCA but long-term survival has not been proven in human studies using the ITD alone. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of, and the requirements for, performing a larger multi-centre trial that would assess the effects of an ITD device on short- and long-term survival following OHCA.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 or older with an unexpected cardiac arrest attended by the North East Ambulance Service

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to be treated with either standard care or resuscitation with the ITD. Participants are followed up using routinely collected data after 12-24 months.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Since participants will be in cardiac arrest, the benefits of taking part are potentially improved survival. Previous studies have not shown a negative effect of using an ITD. There is a theoretical risk of harm if the ITD device remains connected to the respiratory/ventilation system after ROSC system: this will be addressed during paramedic training. There are no additional risks associated with this study directly linked to the ITD.

Where is the study run from?
North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
May 2013 to June 2017

Who is funding the study?
Royal College of Emergency Medicine (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr John Wright

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Dr John Wright


Contact details

Emergency Department
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust
Queen Victoria Road
Newcastle- upon-Tyne
United Kingdom

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number


Study information

Scientific title

A pilot study to Inform a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of an impedance threshold device (ITD) – the ResQPOD, to improve survival outcomes in cardiac arrest patients (the POD pilot study)


POD Pilot

Study hypothesis

Is it possible to carry out a multi-centre trial investigating whether the active impedance threshold device (ITD)-augmented cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival to discharge and beyond following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in comparison with no ITD-CPR?

Ethics approval

NRES Committee North East – Newcastle and North Tyneside 2, 10/01/2013, REC ref: 12/NE/0420

Study design

Single-centred pilot randomised controlled trial

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet


Out of hospital cardiac arrest


Intervention arm:
The Impedance Threshold Device (ITD) (ResQPODTM; ZOLL Medical Corp. and Advanced Circulatory Systems, Inc.) will be attached immediately after rhythm check and defibrillation if the presenting rhythm is ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), and immediately after the rhythm check for any other presenting rhythm, such as asystole or Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA). Otherwise this group will receive standard cardiac arrest management administered by NHS Ambulance Trusts throughout the UK in keeping with the 2010 guidelines from the Resuscitation Council (UK). The ITD remains attached until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or diagnosis of death. The follow up of survivors will be 12 months.

Control arm:
Control participants will receive treatment as usual. This group will receive standard cardiac arrest management and will be identical to the intervention group, other than not involving the ITD.

Recruiting paramedics will carry one sealed trial pack each, containing a usable ITD and either a green ‘Do Use’ or red ‘Do Not Use’ randomisation card informing the paramedics whether they should or should not use the ITD. Packs will be individually numbered for tracking and will be signed out by paramedics on collection. The allocation of numbers to active (‘Do Use’) and control (‘Do Not Use’) packs will be in accordance with a pre-determined randomisation list created in Microsoft Excel. This list allowed allocation of ‘Do Use’ or ‘Do Not Use’ status to each numbered pack. All packs will be opaque and padded, and identical apart from the individual pack number and the randomisation card. Paramedics will carry one pack at a time and only open a pack when they have confirmed that a patient is in cardiac arrest and has met the study inclusion criteria. Once the pack is opened, paramedics will apply a ‘used’ sticker to seal the pack. When an ITD is used, the paramedic will collect another pack (with the lowest remaining number) at the next opportunity from a stocking station with a controlled storage area.

Intervention type



Drug names

Primary outcome measure

The pilot will assess that the study design, including if the training given to paramedics results in high rates of recruitment and whether compliance with treatment allocations is in accordance with the randomisation schedule. It will also be used to inform the sample size calculation for the larger trial and to determine likely recruitment rates. The assessment will include:
1. The correct operation of equipment and whether the control device truly results in investigator blinding, assessed using Clinical Paramedic Feedback at 0-1 weeks
2. The reliability and validity of systems of data capture for each of the likely end points of the definitive RCT, measured by cross-referencing NEAS cardiac arrest database with paramedic feedback, including electronic Patient Report Form (ePRF data) at 0-6 weeks
3. The effectiveness of systems for identifying and reporting adverse effects, measured by paramedic feedback and liaison with name hospital collaborators on outcome at 0-26 weeks
4. Endpoints for the definitive RCT, measured by assessing the outcome data in the pilot with regards to quality and access to clinical data and ease of survivor follow-up. This will occur between 12-24 months
5. Determination of the numbers required in a larger, definitive RCT and likely recruitment rates, measured using 12-month survival rates used to perform a sample size calculation. This will be performed between 12-24 months

Secondary outcome measures

1. Survival to discharge, collected by proforma using the Utstein criteria or routine clinical data collection through the ambulance Patient Report Forms (PRFs) at 12-24 months
2. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) pre-hospital, collected by proforma using the Utstein criteria or routine clinical data collection through the ambulance Patient Report Forms (PRFs) at 12-24 months
3. Survival to Emergency Departmen, collected by proforma using the Utstein criteria or routine clinical data collection through the ambulance Patient Report Forms (PRFs) at 12-24 months
4. Survival to hospital discharge, neurologically intact, collected using the Utstein criteria or routine clinical data collection through collaboration with secondary care contacts at 12-24 months
5. 30-day and 12-month survival, neurologically intact, collected from the NHS Central Register for England and Wales at 12-24 months

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned (if study stopped)


Participant inclusion criteria

1. Adults aged 18 or older with an unexpected cardiorespiratory arrest
2. Primary cardiac origin was suspected, in the absence of trauma, known terminal illness or other external cause such as self-harm
3. Resuscitation attempt in accordance with normal NEAS policy

Participant type


Age group




Target number of participants


Participant exclusion criteria

1. Age 17 or under
2. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation decision
3. NEAS Recognition of Life Extinct policy applied
4. ROSC prior to use of device
5. Pregnant, known or clinically suspected
6. Suspected non-cardiac origin
7. Trauma, suicide

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment

United Kingdom

Trial participating centre

North East Ambulance Service
North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust Bernicia House Goldcrest Way Newburn Riverside
NE15 8NY
United Kingdom

Sponsor information


Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Sponsor details

Freeman Hospital
Freeman Road
High Heaton
United Kingdom

Sponsor type

Hospital/treatment centre



Funder type


Funder name

Royal College of Emergency Medicine

Alternative name(s)


Funding Body Type

private sector organisation

Funding Body Subtype

Universities (academic only)


United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

The study protocol and supplementary documents will be available as supplementary material online following publication. A research article will be submitted to Resuscitation Journal by 2019.

IPD sharing statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Dr John Wright (CI). All available data will be available from the November 2018 for no less than five years. Data will be anonymised quantitative Excel spreadsheet of primary and secondary variables. All appropriate requests for appropriate analysis and mechanisms will be considered. The need for participants consent has been waived following application to a REC and NIGB. All data is anonymised.

Intention to publish date


Participant level data

Available on request

Basic results (scientific)

Publication list

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes