Safe withdrawal of inhaled steroids in mild or moderate COPD
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN65344386 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN65344386 |
| EudraCT/CTIS number | 2016-001876-31 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | 32059 |
- Submission date
- 04/12/2017
- Registration date
- 14/12/2017
- Last edited
- 17/06/2020
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Respiratory
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the name for the group of lung conditions that cause breathing problems. Patients with severe or very severe COPD may benefit from using high-dose inhaled corticosteroid drugs (anti-inflammatory medicines). There is evidence of widespread overprescribing of these drugs to patients with mild or moderate COPD in many countries. These drugs can increase the risk to patients of developing pneumonia (an estimated extra 3000 cases per year in England), fractures and cataracts. In most patients with mild or moderate COPD there is no evidence of any benefit from high dose inhaled corticosteroids. The drugs prescribed to patients with mild or moderate COPD are costly. In the NHS in England more than £122 million is spent each year in prescribing high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in mild and moderate COPD, approximately 20% of the total spending on these drugs. Little is known of patients’ perceptions of the proposed withdrawal of these drugs when prescribed outside guidelines. This research will examine the feasibility of carrying out a trial of withdrawing these high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild or moderate COPD. In this study for which this is a feasibility study the effect of the withdrawal of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids will be assessed for impact on patients' quality of life, lung function, exacerbation frequency, markers of inflammation in the blood, or evidence of interference with breathlessness. The acceptability of this research to patients and practices and its safety will also be assessed. In preparation for their use as outcome measures in any future trial the distribution of the outcome measures will be examined. Finally the ability to test the safety of withdrawing high dose inhaled corticosteroids by assessing the frequency of exacerbations of the disease will be assessed. Success in these aims will enable a definitive cluster randomised controlled trial of the withdrawal of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids to be proposed and conducted at a later date.
Who can participate?
Adults aged 45 and older who have COPD.
What does the study involve?
Participants are asked about their views on high-dose ICS (inhaled cortico-steroids) that are prescribed against guideline advice. Participants are then randomly allocated to one of two groups as to when they are withdrawn from ICS. Those in the first group have ICS withdrawn over two months and the effects of the withdrawal are reviewed at three and six months. Those in the second group continue with ICS for those six months and are then withdrawn from the ICS the same way as those in the first group.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Most participants in this study will benefit from the withdrawal of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids for which there is no good evidence of beneficial effect in patients of the type to be recruited. They are also likely to benefit from the reduced risk of the side effects of high dose inhaled corticosteroids. Participants in the intervention phase of this study will all have the opportunity to withdraw from high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and to see if the withdrawal leads to any undesirable effects. This will apply to those randomised initially and to those not randomised.
Where is the study run from?
Manor Place Surgery (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2016 to July 2019
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Gill Gilworth (Scientific)
Contact information
Scientific
School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences
Addison House
King's College London
London
SE1 1UL
United Kingdom
Study information
| Study design | Randomised; Both; Design type: Treatment, Screening, Process of Care, Drug, Management of Care, Cross-sectional |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised cross over trial |
| Study setting(s) | GP practice |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | ISRCTN65344386_PIS_V2_11Jul17_Withdrawal.pdf |
| Scientific title | Feasibility of the Safe Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in Patients with mild to moderate COPD prescribed outside guidelines |
| Study acronym | SWAP |
| Study objectives | The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of carrying out a trial of withdrawing high dose inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild or moderate COPD by assessing whether withdrawal of high dose inhaled corticosteroids has any impact on patients' quality of life, lung function, exacerbation frequency, markers of inflammation in the blood, or evidence of interference with breathlessness. This study will also assess whether patients and practices find this research acceptable and safe in proceeding with a definitive trial of the withdrawal of high dose inhaled corticosteroids. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Londonbridge NRES Committee, 26/10/2016, ref: 16/LO/1696 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | COPD |
| Intervention | This is an unblinded feasibility study of the withdrawal of high-dose inhaled cortico-steroids (ICS) prescribed for patients with COPD. There are two phases to the study. The first phase is a qualitative interview study of the views of patients on high-dose ICS, who were prescribed them against guideline advice, of their possible withdrawal. The second phase is a study of the effect of withdrawing high-dose ICS on a number of patient measures including lung function, quality of life, breathlessness, blood biomarkers, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and neural respiratory drive. Patients are randomised to ICS withdrawal. ICS are withdrawn over 2 months and the effects of withdrawal reviewed at three months and six months. Patients randomised to continue on ICS have the same assessments over six months. At the end of six months patients randomised to ICS withdrawal leave the study. Patients randomised to continue with ICS have their ICS withdrawn according to the same protocol as those patients randomised to withdrawal in the first place. Patients randomised to continue on ICS in the first place remain in the study for one year. The principle outcome measure of the feasibility of a trial of withdrawal of high-dose ICS will be the proportion of patients who attend the baseline interview who find the invitation to participate acceptable and are willing to submit to randomisation. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | The principle outcome measure of the feasibility of a trial of withdrawal of high-dose ICS will be the proportion of patients who attend the baseline interview who find the invitation to participate acceptable and are willing to submit to randomisation. |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Proportion of patients who accept the investigations of the effect of high-dose ICS withdrawal (acceptability of the main trial) 2. Proportion of practices that agreed to participate 3. The distribution of the change in quality of life (SAS-CRQ questionnaire), lung function (spirometry), exacerbation frequency, cellular and molecular biomarkers (FBC, eosinophils, neutrophils, CRP, fibrinogen, periostin) , and neural respiratory drive (experimental assessment of electro-myelogram of afferent electrical impulses in the parasternal muscles), between baseline and six months in patients from whom high-dose ICS were withdrawn (allow the setting of sample sizes for the main trial) 4. Frequency of exacerbations (assessing the safety of the main trial) 5. Proportion of participants in whom evidence of the effectiveness of high-dose ICS was evident from a deterioration in quality of life, lung function, exacerbation frequency, cellular and molecular biomarkers, and neural respiratory drive (assessing sample size for detection of ICS benefits for the main trial) |
| Overall study start date | 01/01/2016 |
| Completion date | 31/07/2019 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | Planned Sample Size: 106; UK Sample Size: 106 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Known diagnosis of mild or moderate COPD (forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) ≥50% predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.7) obtained from spirometry within the past 12 months and confirmed at interview 2. Prescribed and have used high-dose ICS (alone or in combination with a long-acting bronchodilator) at a dose of fluticasone propionate ≥250mcg/day, fluticasone furoate ≥92mcg/day, budesonide >400mcg/day or beclomethasone dipropionate >400mcg/day on most days for at least 3 months 3. Age ≥ 45 years 4. <2 exacerbations in the previous year and no admissions to hospital with an exacerbation since the diagnosis of COPD was made 5. BMI of less than 35 |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients with a BMI greater than 35 2. History of asthma 3. Lung cancer 4. Breathlessness secondary to cardiac disease 5. Moderate or severe osteoarthritis limiting mobility 6. Current severe mental illness (severe depression or psychosis) 7. Current alcohol dependence 8. Dementia 9. Patients who use continuous oral corticosteroids 10. Pregnant females or females of childbearing age not using effective contraception |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/10/2017 |
| Date of final enrolment | 13/04/2019 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Camberwell
London
SE17 3BD
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
Room 1.8 Hodgkin Building
Guy's Campus
London
SE1 4UL
England
United Kingdom
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/0220mzb33 |
|---|
Funders
Funder type
Government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 30/08/2020 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not expected to be made available |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Publication of the main findings is planned in a high-impact peer reviewed journal towards the end of 2019. As this is a feasibility study for a trial and not a trial a trial protocol has not been published. At this point there is no intention to do so. All relevant additional documents will be available on request from the trial chief investigator, Dr Patrick White, at patrick.white@kcl.ac.uk |
| IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available because the numbers will be small (approx. 75) and will be unlikely to representative of the population from which they will have been recruited. The data will be held in anonymised form at King’s College, London. |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | version V2 | 11/07/2017 | 14/12/2017 | No | Yes |
| Participant information sheet | version V3 | 12/07/2017 | 14/12/2017 | No | Yes |
| Other publications | preliminary research | 31/12/2019 | 17/06/2020 | Yes | No |
| Results article | qualitative results | 01/01/2019 | 17/06/2020 | Yes | No |
| HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No |
Additional files
- ISRCTN65344386_PIS_V2_11Jul17_Withdrawal.pdf
- Uploaded 14/12/2017
- ISRCTN65344386_PIS_V3_ 12Jul17.pdf
- Uploaded 14/12/2017
Editorial Notes
17/06/2020: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication references added.
2. The intention to publish date was changed from 01/12/2019 to 30/08/2020.
21/05/2019: Internal review.
29/03/2019: The condition has been changed from "Specialty: Primary care, Primary sub-specialty: Ophthalmology; UKCRC code/ Disease: Respiratory/ Chronic lower respiratory diseases" to "COPD" following a request from the NIHR.
14/12/2017: The ISRCTN prospective/retrospective flag compares the date of registration with the recruitment start date and does not include any grace period. The registration of this study was requested through the NIHR Portfolio and was finalised within 6 months of the recruitment starting.
