30-year follow-up of personality and clinical status of patients with anxiety and depression in the Nottingham Study of Neurotic Disorder

ISRCTN ISRCTN65727743
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN65727743
Secondary identifying numbers 16681
Submission date
18/06/2014
Registration date
11/09/2014
Last edited
03/01/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
The Nottingham study of neurotic disorder (NSND) was set up in 1983 to look at both the short and long term outcome of common anxiety and depressive disorders. In particular, it examined whether separately classifying individual neurotic disorders (for example into depression, bipolar affective disorder, social anxiety disorder) was actually helpful for either science or in treating sufferers of these conditions. Many patients were found to be have a mixed anxiety/depression disorder and could be considered to suffer from a general neurotic syndrome. The study investigated whether diagnosing a patient as suffering from a general neurotic disorder rather than making a conventional clinical diagnosis made any difference to predicting how the patient responded to treatment, or whether some modes of treatment (different treatments) were more successful than others. Data for the study has been collected on 9 further occasions since 1983, the last time being 12 years after the start of the trial. We are now repeating the assessments after 30 years as neurotic disorders can have some very long-term effects.

Who can participate?
Adults on no active treatment at the start of the study and diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder, neurotic depression or panic disorder.

What does the study involve?
Participants are asked to attend a single follow up interview lasting about 85 minutes. The questions cover psychiatric diagnosis and symptoms, personality and social functioning, and service contacts. Written permission to access the patients' general practice medical notes is also requested at the beginning of the interview.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The patients have been followed up many times previously and have been seen by the same investigator, Dr Helen Tyrer, on the last occasion. Many look forward to the updated assessment and all of those approached at 12 years who gave consent to be seen at 30 years have been noted. At 12 years we had very positive views about the study and its progress. 4 patients who said they did not want to be followed up will not be seen at 30 years. We do not think there are any particular risks of the study – all data to be obtained have been asked about before. We will also be carrying out an interview to find out what major events have occurred over the past 30 years. This will include finding out how much each event has affected their mental health, and how it came about. This is part of a formal investigation into nidotherapy, the changing of the environment to better fit a person and their surroundings.

Where is the study run from?
Imperial College London (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2014 to June 2017

Who is funding the study?
1. Department of Health – Offender Health (UK)
2. Nicola Pigott Memorial Fund (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Professor Peter Tyrer
p.tyrer@imperial.ac.uk

Contact information

Prof Peter Tyrer
Scientific

Department of Psychological Medicine
The Reynolds Building
St. Dunstans Road
London
W6 8RP
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised; Observational; Design type: Cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title30-year follow-up of personality and clinical status of patients with anxiety and depression in the Nottingham Study of Neurotic Disorder: an observational cohort study following a randomised trial
Study acronymNott30
Study objectivesThis is a long-term follow-up of patients recruited to a randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy, drug therapy and self-help in 1988, and although this has now become a cohort study in the first two years of the trial the mode of therapy was kept the same as that randomised.

More details can be found here: http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/Search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=16681

Original trial can be found at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2899234
Ethics approval(s)12/EM/0331; First MREC approval date 21/11/2012
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Mental Health; Subtopic: Anxiety, Depression; Disease: Depression, Anxiety
InterventionIn the original trial the patients were randomised to one of three drug treatments (diazepam, dothiepin and placebo), cognitive behaviour therapy or self-help, and most of the patients (70%) maintained this allocation for the first 2 years of this study.

1. Cognitive behaviour therapy: 3-6 sessions of treatment given by a trained nurse under supervision from an established therapist
2. Diazepam: matching tablets of diazepam (5-30 mg daily) with ascending dosage to preferred maximum over 6 weeks then reduction to zero by 10 weeks
3. Dothiepin, matching tablets of dothiepin (25-150 mg daily) with ascending dosage to preferred maximum over 6 weeks then reduction to zero by 10 weeks
4. Placebo: matching placebo medication
5. Self-help: relaxation tape and self-help instructions

Follow Up Length: 360 month(s); Study Entry : Registration only
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureComprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale; Timepoint(s): baseline, 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 32, 52, and 104 weeks, and follow-up at 5, 12 and 30 years
Secondary outcome measures1. DSM diagnosis; Timepoint(s): baseline, 10, 16, 32, 52, and 104 weeks, and follow-up at 12 and 30 years
2. Hospital admission; Timepoint(s): baseline, 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 32, 52, and 104 weeks, and follow-up at 5, 12 and 30 years
3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety section; Timepoint(s): baseline, 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 32, 52, and 104 weeks, and follow-up at 5, 12 and 30 years
4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Section; Timepoint(s): baseline, 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 32, 52, and 104 weeks, and follow-up at 5, 12 and 30 years
5. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; Timepoint(s): baseline, 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 32, 52, and 104 weeks, and follow-up at 5, 12 and 30 years
6. Neurotic Disorder Outcome Scale (NDOS); Timepoint(s): baseline, 5, 12 and 30 years
personality status; Timepoint(s): baseline, 2 years, 12 and 30 years
7. Social Functioning Questionnaire; Timepoint(s): 12 and 30 years
8. Suicidal behaviour; Timepoint(s): baseline, 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 32, 52, and 104 weeks, and follow-up at 5, 12 and 30 years
Overall study start date01/01/2014
Completion date30/06/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 130; UK Sample Size: 130; Description: Patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder, dysthymia and panic disorder seen in general practice psychiatric clinics
Total final enrolment210
Key inclusion criteria1. On no active treatment at baseline
2. Satisfies diagnostic criteria for GAD, dysthymia or panic disorder
3. Target Gender: Male & Female

The participants to the original trial (Tyrer et al, 1988) were:
1. Aged between 18 and 65
2. Seen in general practice psychiatric clinics
3. Following the diagnostic criteria of the then new American diagnostic classification (DSM-III)) had a diagnosis of dysthymia (formerly neurotic depression), generalised anxiety disorder or panic disorder
4. Were not on any form of therapy for mental disorder at the time of randomisation
Key exclusion criteriaLack of informed consent
Date of first enrolment01/01/2014
Date of final enrolment30/06/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Psychological Medicine
London
W6 8RP
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Imperial College London (UK)
University/education

Joint Research Compliance Office
Charing Cross Hospital
Fulham Palace Road
London
W6 8RF
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/041kmwe10

Funders

Funder type

Government

Department of Health – Offender Health (UK)

No information available

Nicola Pigott Memorial Fund (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/12/2020
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Other publications mortality paper 01/02/2021 06/12/2019 Yes No
Results article 30-year follow up 12/04/2021 18/05/2021 Yes No
Other publications secondary analysis 01/05/2021 19/05/2021 Yes No
Results article 01/05/2022 03/01/2024 Yes No
Results article 01/03/2022 03/01/2024 Yes No
Results article 01/05/2022 03/01/2024 Yes No
Results article 01/05/2022 03/01/2024 Yes No
Results article 01/07/2023 03/01/2024 Yes No

Editorial Notes

03/01/2024: Publication references added.
20/12/2023: Internal review.
19/05/2021: Publication reference added.
18/05/2021: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment was added.
06/12/2019: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The overall trial end date has been changed from 31/12/2018 to 30/06/2019.
3. The intention to publish date has been added.
17/08/2018: The overall trial end date was updated from 30/06/2017 to 31/12/2018