Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Prospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Donated blood is a precious resource. Having blood available is essential for major procedures including joint replacement, cardiac surgery, organ transplantation, cancer care and the management of major trauma. When there is no blood available, this reduces the ability of the NHS to deliver high quality health care wherever it is needed, and all at the same time. There may be postponements or cancellation of operations if blood is required elsewhere. Intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) collects the patient’s own blood lost during an operation, cleans it and returns it to their circulation. It reduces the amount of donor blood given in certain operations. Its use in Caesarean section (CS) has not yet been adequately examined. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends IOCS for massive blood loss in an emergency, but has called for evidence from clinical trials to support its routine use. This study will assess if IOCS during Caesarean section reduces the need to give a donor blood transfusion.

Who can participate?
Around 3050 women at risk of bleeding will be studied. As many women as possible booked at around 17 large obstetric units will be given information about the study, prior to birth. Those who deliver by Caesarean section and are eligible for the study will be asked if they would like to participate.

What does the study involve?
Half of the participants will be randomly allocated to IOCS during surgery, and half will receive usual care with donor blood transfusion if necessary. The necessity for transfusion will be recorded for each group. Other maternal health and cost outcomes will be collected. Participation in the study will be from the time of admission to hospital to the time of discharge. There will be no additional tests required but participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire prior to discharge. The research team is hand-picked from regional centres across England, Scotland and Wales and includes national experts in obstetrics, anaesthesia, cell salvage, health technology assessment and health economics.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The benefits are uncertain (hence the need for the trial). There is a possibility that IOCS may reduce the need for donor blood transfusion, and the risks associated with this. Blood given during Caesarean section is from blood donations. All blood used in the UK is thoroughly screened for infections and is completely safe, as long as you are given the correct blood group. Very rarely, mistakes are made and the wrong blood group is given or the recipient has a reaction to the blood. IOCS may, by improving iron levels, allow women to leave hospital sooner and reduce the chance of side effects. There are two concerns about using the cell saver machine during Caesarean sections. Neither concern is related to the health of your baby. Historically, the cell saver was not used in Caesarean sections because it was thought that it might increase the chance of a woman developing a serious condition called 'Amniotic Fluid Embolism'. This is where some of the fluid surrounding the baby in the womb enters the mother's blood stream with serious consequences. More recent work shows that it is highly unlikely that IOCS could cause this condition, but we can never be 100% certain. The second concern is of Rhesus disease in any future babies. This can happen when a woman with the blood type known as 'rhesus-negative' (Rh-) has a baby with the blood type rhesus-positive (Rh+). If the mother's blood comes into contact with the baby's blood, the mother's immune system then produces antibodies that are capable of attacking her baby's blood cells and these antibodies are activated in all future pregnancies when the baby is Rh+. It is possible that the mother's blood can come into contact with the baby's blood during a normal delivery but it is also possible during the IOCS procedure. The exposure to baby's blood is measured using a test called the Kleihauer test. All rhesus-negative women who have a Caesarean section have an injection soon after delivery to prevent these antibodies developing; this is called an anti-D antibody injection. So, participation in the study or having IOCS will not be any different from standard practice in preventing Rhesus disease.

Where is the study run from?
At least 17 large UK obstetric units in collaboration with the UKCRN registered Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit (PCTU) at Bart's and the London School of Medicine.

When is study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2013 to April 2016

Who is funding the study?
National Institute of Health Research, Health Technology Assessment Programme (NIHR HTA) (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Professor Khalid Khan

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Prof Khalid Khan


Contact details

Professor of Women's Health and Clinical Epidemiology
Women's Health Research Unit
Blizard Institute
Bart's and The London School of Medicine
Queen Mary
University of London
58 Turner Street
E1 2AB
United Kingdom

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number

HTA 10/57/32, Version 6, 12/09/2014

Study information

Scientific title

A randomised controlled trial of intra-operative cell salvage during caesarean section in women at risk of haemorrhage



Study hypothesis

Primary Objective:
To determine if the routine use of intra-operative cell salvage (IOCS) during caesarean section (CS), in women at risk of haemorrhage, reduces the need for donor blood transfusion in comparison to current practice.

Secondary Objectives:
1. To determine the effect of IOCS on secondary outcomes including the number of units of donor blood transfused, mean fall in serum haemoglobin level and maternal morbidity resulting from post-operative anaemia (time to first mobilisation, duration of hospital stay, and immediate multidimensional fatigue inventory.
2. To determine if the routine use of IOCS during CS, in women at risk of haemorrhage, is cost effective in comparison to current practice.

Ethics approval

NRES Committee North-West Haydock, ref: 12/NW/0513

Study design

Individually randomised controlled multi-centre study with cost-effectiveness analysis

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet


Haemorrhage / Caesarean Section (CS)


Intra-operative Cell Salvage (IOCS): A technique which allows the blood lost during surgery to be returned to the patient. Blood is aspirated from the surgical field; the red cell component isolated by centrifugation and after washing and filtration, re-transfused. The ability to return salvaged blood is dependent on sufficient volume being collected and processed. Blood will be uniformly returned to women in the cell salvage group if this volume threshold is reached.

The control group will receive current practice (without cell salvage) which may involve donor blood transfusion.

It is not possible to conduct a blinded study, since group allocation will be self-evident. In life threatening acute haemorrhage, women will be managed at the discretion of attending clinicians, in line with Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) guidance, potentially including the use of cell salvage in the control arm. The indications for postoperative donor blood transfusion will be set according to local protocols in each hospital and deviations from this criterion will be monitored.

Intervention type



Drug names

Primary outcome measure

The proportion of women needing peripartum transfusion. For the IOCS group this is measured by the use of donor blood transfusion; transfusion of routinely salvaged blood as part of the intervention will not count as an event. For the standard care group this is measured by the use of donor blood transfusion and/or the use of salvaged blood transfusion set up as an emergency to deal with haemorrhage.

Secondary outcome measures

1. Severity of events quantified as the volume of blood transfused, where transfusion is defined as above for the primary outcome - i.e. donor blood transfusion in the IOCS group, and donor blood transfusion plus salvaged blood transfusion set up as an emergency in the standard care group
2. Time to first mobilisation after CS
3. Length of hospital stay
4. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
5. Resources used intra- and post-operatively, including IOCS consumables and donor blood transfusions
6. Costs of staff training, service procurement and provision of care will be collected alongside clinical outcomes
7. Safety Outcomes:
7.1. Pre- and post-operative serum haemoglobin, and mean fall in haemoglobin level
7.2. Maternal exposure to fetal blood measured by Kleihauer test
7.3. Requirement for and the dose of anti-D antibody administered
8. Process outcomes
8.1. The number of cases in the IOCS arm where sufficient blood is harvested for re-transfusion
8.2. Volume of blood returned in IOCS (mean/SD)
8.3. Proportion of transfusion reaction associated with allogeneic donor blood transfusion
8.4. Episodes of technical failure of IOCS

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned (if study stopped)


Participant inclusion criteria

1. 16 years of age or older
2. Delivery by elective or emergency caesarean section with an identifiable increased risk of haemorrhage
3. Ability to provide informed consent

Participant type


Age group




Target number of participants


Participant exclusion criteria

1. Elective first Caesarean section for maternal request or breech presentation
2. Sickle cell disease
3. Active malignancy contraindicated to CS e.g. abdominal cancer
4. Cultural or social beliefs contraindicating blood transfusion e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses
5. Significant antibodies making it difficult to find cross matched blood for transfusion
6. Unable to understand written and spoken English

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment

United Kingdom

Trial participating centre

Queen Mary, University of London
E1 2AB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information


Queen Mary, University of London (UK)

Sponsor details

c/o Gerry Leonard
Head of Resources
Joint R&D Office
5 Walden Street
E1 2EF
United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 7882 7260

Sponsor type




Funder type


Funder name

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Alternative name(s)

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA

Funding Body Type

government organisation

Funding Body Subtype

Federal/National Government


United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date


Participant level data

Not provided at time of registration

Basic results (scientific)

Publication list

2017 results in:
2018 results in:

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes

19/03/2018: Internal review. 15/02/2018: Publication reference added. 30/01/2018: Publication reference added. 09/03/2016: Changed overall trial date from 01/05/2012 to 01/10/2012. Changed overall trial end date from 30/04/2015 to 31/10/2016. Changed recruitment start date from 01/10/2012 to 01/06/2013. Changed recruitment end date from 30/04/2015 to 30/04/2016. Changed intention to publish date from 01/04/2016 to 01/10/2017.