Effects of continuous intravenous magnesium on features of central sensitisation in complex regional pain syndrome type one patients

ISRCTN ISRCTN66289967
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN66289967
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
02/05/2007
Registration date
02/05/2007
Last edited
09/05/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Susan Collins
Scientific

VU Medical Centre
Afdeling Anesthesiologie
Amsterdam
1081 HV
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)20 444 0293
Email s.collins@vumc.nl

Study information

Study designRandomised, double blinded, placebo controlled, parallel group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleEffects of continuous intravenous magnesium on features of central sensitisation in complex regional pain syndrome type one patients
Study objectivesMagnesium sulphate reduces pain for more than 50% on the Box scale when compared to the baseline, and for more than two points to the placebo group.
Ethics approval(s)Approval received from the Medical Ethical Review Committee of the VU University Medical Center on the 26th February 2007 (ref: 2004/153).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedComplex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 (CRPS I)
InterventionIntervention: 70 mg/kg magnesium sulphate continuously administered in four hours via an intravenous infusion (in two 50 ml syringe) of 24 ml/hour a day for a period of five days
Control: an equal amount of NaCl 0.9% solution (in two 50 ml syringe) continuously in four hours via an intravenous infusion of 24 ml/hour a day for a period of five days
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Magnesium sulphate
Primary outcome measurePain will be measured in a pain diary at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks after treatment. In this diary patients will record their pain rate on a 11 point Box scale three times daily for a period of one week before each measurement point.
Secondary outcome measures1. Sensory complaints:
a. McGill pain questionnaire will be used to obtain information about the type of pain experienced by patients
b. Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments will be used to objectively measure sensitivity of the skin (e.g. hypesthesia, hyperesthesia and allodynia)
2. Impairments: patients functional status will be assessed with the Impairment Level Sumscore, in which: pain (measured by Box scale and McGill pain questionnaire), temperature (measured with infrared thermometer), volume (measured with water displacement volumeter) and active range of motion (measured with goniometers) will be converted into a compound sumscore
3. Functional disability: the Radboud Skills Questionnaire, the Walking Stairs Questionnaire and Questionnaire Rising and Sitting Down will be used to assess disability in patients with respectively upper and lower CRPS1
4. Quality of life: The 36-item Short Form (SF-36) and European Quality of Life (EuroQol) questionnaires will be used to measure quality of life

Secondary outcomes will be measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks after treatment.
Overall study start date01/12/2006
Completion date01/07/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants72
Total final enrolment56
Key inclusion criteria1. Diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type one (CRPS1) according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP):
a. presence of an initiating noxious event or cause for immobilisation
b. continuing pain, allodynia or hyperalgesia, with which the pain is disproportioned to any inciting event and is not limited to the area of an individual peripheral nerve
c. evidence at any time of oedema. Skin blood flow abnormality, or abnormal sudomotor activity in the painful area since the inciting event
d. conditions which could otherwise account for the level of pain and dysfunction should be excluded
Note: criteria b-d have to be met
2. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-spontaneous pain score of 5 cm or higher
3. Patients should be between 18 to 70 years old
4. CRPS1 in one extremity
5. First time experience of patient with CRPS1
6. Other medication has to be stopped for more then one week before the trial starts
7. Patients should give written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Not being able to give informed consent
2. Another (second) chronic pain syndrome, interfering with pain ratings
3. Another syndrome interfering with functional tests
4. CRPS1 in both hands or feet
5. Patient has experienced CRPS1 before
6. Known kidney and/or severe liver disease
7. Known nerve damage in the affected area
8. Active infection
9. Mental retardation
10. Psychiatric abnormality
11. Malignant disease
12. Patients with heart failure
13. Patients with pacemakers or implanted defibrillators
14. Patients with pulmonary congestion
15. Pregnancy
Date of first enrolment01/12/2006
Date of final enrolment01/07/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

VU Medical Centre
Amsterdam
1081 HV
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Vrije University Medical Centre (VUMC) (The Netherlands)
Hospital/treatment centre

Department of Anesthesiology
P.O. Box 7057
Amsterdam
1007 MB
Netherlands

Website http://www.vumc.nl/english/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00q6h8f30

Funders

Funder type

Government

SENTER - A branch of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (The Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2013 09/05/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

09/05/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.