Reduction of severe hypoglycaemia with continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion in type one diabetic patients unsuccessfully treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

ISRCTN ISRCTN68954085
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN68954085
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
17/09/2006
Registration date
15/11/2006
Last edited
08/09/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Andreas Liebl
Scientific

Woernerweg 30
Bad Heilbrunn
83670
Germany

Email dr.liebl@t-online.de

Study information

Study designOpen, randomised, controlled, cross-over, multinational, 12-month study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study acronymDiaPort Study
Study objectivesObjective:
Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with the DiaPort system using regular insulin was compared to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using insulin Lispro, to investigate the frequency of hypoglycaemias, blood glucose control, quality of life, and safety.
Ethics approval(s)Approved by the Ethical Committee of the Bayerische Landesärztekammer in Munich, September 2000.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDiabetes mellitus type one
Intervention60 type one diabetic patients with frequent hypoglycaemias and/or HbA1c greater than 7.0% with CSII were randomised to CIPII or CSII. The aim was to obtain the best possible blood glucose while avoiding hypoglycaemias.

1. Patients in the CSII group continued their CSII using insulin Lispro
2. Patients in the CIPII group had an implantation of a percutaneous DiaPort system under general anesthesia. The catheter was placed into the peritoneal cavity. The exact localisation of the DiaPort was chosen individually according to the regular habits and clothing of the patients. Mostly the port was implanted into the lower right or left quadrant of the abdomen. CSII was terminated, and the insulin pump was connected to the DiaPort. The insulin dosage was optimised during the stay in hospital and at each visit.

In both treatment groups, the target was to obtain fasting and pre-prandial blood glucose values between 80 - 120 mg/dl, and average blood glucose values below 150 mg/dl, while avoiding hypoglycemias at the same time. Also, in both groups H-TRONplus insulin pumps from Roche Diagnostics were used. For intraperitoneal infusion only regular insulin for pumps (Insuman Infusat® or H-tronin®, Aventis®) was administered.

In both groups, there were regular evaluations of diabetes complications, vital parameters, HbA1c, safety laboratory data (one central laboratory for all study sites), abdominal ultrasound examination, quality of life (using the Diabetes Quality of Life measure [DQoL]), port-related complications, and photographic documentation.

The patients performed and documented at least four blood glucose self measurements daily (prior to each main meal and just before bedtime). Before visits, additional measurements (two hours after each meal and during night time between 2:00 and 3:00 am) were performed.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Insulin Infusion
Primary outcome measureThe primary endpoint of the study was the frequency of hypoglycaemias (defined as blood glucose below 54 mg/dl [3 mmol/l]) per patient year with CIPII using DiaPort in comparison to CSII with insulin Lispro.
Secondary outcome measures1. Frequency of severe hypoglycaemias (defined by hospitalisation, unconsciousness, seizures or intravenous glucose administration)
2. Metabolic control (HbA1c, blood glucose, blood glucose fluctuations)
3. Quality of life (DQoL)
4. Safety of CIPII with DiaPort in comparison to CSII
Overall study start date01/10/2000
Completion date31/12/2001

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants62
Key inclusion criteria1. Male or female patients at least 18 years of age
2. Type one diabetes
3. Unsuccessfully treated with CSII (i.e. frequent hypoglycaemias according to the assessment of the investigator and/or HbA1c above 7.0%)
Key exclusion criteria1. Lack of cooperation or of mental capacity
2. Pregnancy or wish for pregnancy
3. Abuse of alcohol or drugs
4. Lack of personal hygiene
5. Frequent change of treating physicians
6. Severe liver disease
7. Current malignant disease
8. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
9. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
10. Contraindications for anaesthesia or surgical operations
11. Severe eating disorders
12. Severe psychological or psychiatric disorders
13. Lack of willingness to perform at least four blood glucose self-measurements per day
Date of first enrolment01/10/2000
Date of final enrolment31/12/2001

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Austria
  • France
  • Germany
  • Netherlands
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

Woernerweg 30
Bad Heilbrunn
83670
Germany

Sponsor information

Disetronic Medical Systems AG (Switzerland)
Industry

Kirchbergstrasse 190
Burgdorf
CH-3401
Switzerland

Website http://www.disetronic.com/disetronic.asp?menuId=2&languageId=2
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00by1q217

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Disetronic Medical Systems AG (Switzerland)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan