Protective mechanical ventilation during open surgery on the abdomen with general anaesthesia
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN70332574 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN70332574 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) | NCT01441791 |
| Protocol serial number | NTR2517 |
| Sponsor | Academic Medical Centre (AMC) (Netherlands) |
| Funder | Academisch Medisch Centrum |
- Submission date
- 29/10/2010
- Registration date
- 06/12/2010
- Last edited
- 21/07/2015
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
When abdominal surgery is carried out with general anesthesia (i.e., the patient is given a drug to make them unconscious), a machine called a ventilator must be used to assist or replace spontaneous breathing (mechanical ventilation). Mechanical ventilation may cause partial collapse of the lungs, a medical condition termed 'atelectasis'. Atelectasis can cause problems after surgery, sometimes leading to severe illness. Measures to prevent atelectasis were found to be beneficial in studies of mechanically ventilated Intensive Care Unit patients. It is uncertain whether such preventive measures also benefit patients undergoing surgery. This study compares two ventilation strategies. One generally used strategy uses low airway pressures; the other less frequently used strategy uses higher airway pressures. The strategy using lower pressures may lead to collapse of parts of the lung; the strategy using higher pressures may prevent partial lung collapse, but at the same time may cause low blood pressure, requiring infusion of more fluids and/or agents to maintain adequate blood pressures during surgery. We do not know which of these two ventilation strategies is the best. However, we think the strategy using higher pressures can protect against atelectasis and therefore protect against lung problems after surgery.
Who can participate?
Patients over 18 years of age who will be mechanically ventilated because of planned general anesthesia for abdominal surgery. Patients with an increased risk of lung problems after surgery are selected for this study.
What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to be mechanically ventilated according to one of the two ventilation strategies (i.e., lower or higher airway pressure) throughout the surgical procedure.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
You will not experience any discomfort because you will be under general anesthesia during mechanical ventilation. You will be closely monitored during and after surgery for up to 5 days.
We cannot promise the study will help you, but the information we get from this study may benefit future patients.
Where is the study run from?
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam. This is an international trial in which up to 40 centers worldwide will participate.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study started recruiting patients in February 2011 and is expected to run until June 2013.
Who is funding the study?
European Society of Anesthesiology.
Who is the main contact?
SNT Hemmes, MD
provhilotrial@gmail.com
Contact information
Scientific
Department of Intensive Care
Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Meibergdreef 9, C3-415
Amsterdam
1105 AZ
Netherlands
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Multinational prospective double-blind randomised controlled two-arm trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Protective ventilation during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
| Study acronym | PROVHILO |
| Study objectives | Post-operative respiratory failure, in particular after abdominal surgery and general anaesthesia, adds to morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. Lung protective mechanical ventilation, with the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres, has the potential to prevent lung injury in patients with injured lungs. It is the question whether PEEP and recruitment also protects the lungs in patients without previous lung injury. Please note, the Steering Committee decided to add an amendment to the trial protocol as of 10/07/2011. In this amendment the adjusted criteria for chest Xray and standard laboratory investigations are explained and stated, because of the costs related to performing 2x chest X-ray and 4x laboratory tests. The changes can be foud in the interventions section below. On 21/05/2013 the following changes were made to the trial record: 1. The overall trial end date was changed from 01/12/2013 to 30/04/2013. 2. France and Sweden were removed from the countries of recruitment, and Belgium, Chile, Croatia, UK and USA were added to the countries of recruitment. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Ethical commission of the AMC, Amsterdam. Amendent approved on 10/07/2011. |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Ventilator acquired lung injury (VILI) |
| Intervention | 1. The conventional group will be ventilated with low PEEP (max 2 cm H2O), without recruitment 2. The interventional group will be ventilated with higher PEEP (12 cm H2O), with intra-operative recruitment manoeuvres; directly after induction of anaesthesia, after any disconnection from the mechanical ventilator and directly before extubation. The recruitment manoeuvre will be performed as follows: 1. Set peak inspiratory pressure limit at 45 cm H20 2. Set tidal volume at 8 ml/kg IBW and respiratory rate at 6 - 8 breaths/min, while PEEP at 12 cm H20. In case an anaesthesia ventilator does not allow a rate of 8/min or lower, then the lowest possible respiration rate allowed by the machine should be used 3. Set inspiratory to expiratory ratio (I:E) at 1:2 4. Increase tidal volume in steps of 4 ml/kg IBW until plateau pressure is 30 - 35 cm H20 5. Allow 3 breaths with the plateau pressure of 30 - 35 cm H20 6. Set respiratory rate, I:E, inspiratory pause and tidal volume back at values preceding recruitment, while maintaining the PEEP at 12 cm H20 Added 25/10/2011 in accordance with protocol change from 10/07/2011: Chest radiography (CXR): 1. CXRs (pre-operative and on post-operative day 1) will not be standard. However, a CXR can be taken at the lowest clinical threshold. In the occurrence of one of the following criteria obtaining a CXR should seriously be considered: Pre-operative 1.1 SpO2 < 96% (in supine position in room air) 1.2 Increased dyspnea within last 2 months 1.3 Upper or lower respiratory tract infection in last 30 days 1.4 COPD with inhalation therapy or glucocorticosteroid treatment 1.5 Presence of clinical signs of congestion (e.g., dyspnea, edema, rales and/or jugular venous distension) Post-operative 1.6 SpO2 < 96% (in supine position in room air) 1.7 PaO2 < 60 mmHg 1.8 Suspected pulmonary infection (new or changed sputum or fever > 38.3 oC or WBC > 12 x 109/ml or started antibiotics, without any other focus of infection) 1.9 Presence of clinical signs of congestion (e.g., dyspnea, edema, rales and/or jugular venous distension) Criteria for obtaining a CXR on day 2 to 5 remain unchanged; CXRs on those days should be obtained on clinical judgment by attending physicians. If a CXR is obtained, radiological signs should be used for scoring post-operative pulmonary complications of that day 2. Timing pre-operative CXR: CXR obtained within 6 months before surgery is acceptable, provided there has been no clinical change in pulmonary condition of the patient 3. Timing of post-operative CXR: CXRs obtained until 24 hours after surgery are accepted as day 1 post-operative CXR 4. If a CXR is obtained, the radiology report should be translated into English, Italian or German. Standard laboratory tests: 1. Standard laboratory tests on day 3 and day 5 are not necessary. However, it has our preference to collect them if possible. If laboratory tests are ordered by the attending physician, they can be used for scoring extra-pulmonary complications. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Post-operative pulmonary complications composed of: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Intra-operative complications (desaturation, barotrauma, hypotension during recruitment, need for vasopressors) |
| Completion date | 30/04/2013 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 900 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Planned elective abdominal surgery 2. General anaesthesia with intravenous medication 3. High or intermediate risk for post-operative pulmonary complications 4. Aged greater than or equal to 18 years, either sex |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Aged less than 18 years 2. Body mass index greater than 40 kg/m^2 3. Laparoscopic surgery 4. Previous lung surgery (any) 5. Persistent haemodynamic instability, intractable shock (considered haemodynamic unsuitable for the study by the patient's managing physician) 6. History of previous severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (non-invasive ventilation and/or oxygen therapy at home, repeated systemic corticosteroid therapy for acute exacerbations of COPD) 7. Recent immunosuppressive medication (patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the last 2 months) 8. Severe cardiac disease (New York Heart Association class III or IV, or acute coronary syndrome, or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmia's) 9. Mechanical ventilation greater than than 30 minutes (e.g., in cases of general anaesthesia because of surgery) within last 30 days 10. Pregnancy (excluded by laboratory analysis) 11. Acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome expected to require prolonged post-operative mechanical ventilation 12. Neuromuscular disease (any) 13. Consented for another interventional study or refusal to participate in the study |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/02/2011 |
| Date of final enrolment | 30/04/2013 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- Austria
- Belgium
- Chile
- Croatia
- Germany
- Italy
- Netherlands
- Spain
- United States of America
Study participating centre
1105 AZ
Netherlands
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 09/08/2014 | Yes | No | |
| Protocol article | protocol | 06/05/2011 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
| Study website | Study website | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |