Clinical and cost effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue management

ISRCTN ISRCTN70891354
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN70891354
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
20/08/2007
Registration date
07/10/2010
Last edited
01/11/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Carey McClellan
Scientific

The Academic Department of Emergency Care
The Adult Emergency Department
University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trusts
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)7846 410489
Email carey2.mcclellan@uwe.ac.uk

Study information

Study designPragmatic multicentre three-arm blinded randomised controlled trial of equivalence
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleClinical and cost effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue management: a randomised trial
Study acronymMISTi Trial - Management In Soft Tissue injury Trial
Study objectivesThis research is a trial of equivalence and investigates two null hypotheses:
1. The clinical outcome of adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a soft tissue injury (STI) is different between healthcare professionals
2. A doctor, Emergency Nurse Practitioner (ENP) and Extended Scope Physiotherapist (ESP) are not equally cost-effective in treating ED patients with soft tissue injuries
Ethics approval(s)Approved by:
1. The Salisbury and South Wiltshire Ethics Committee, obtained on the 4th May 2006 (ref: 06/Q2008/10)
2. The Faculty of Health and Social Care Ethics Committee at the University of the West of England, obtained on the 10th July 2006 (ref: HSC/06/07/57)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAcute peripheral musculoskeletal soft tissue injury
InterventionActive control: Doctors (of all grades)
Intervention under investigation: Extended Scope Physiotherapist (ESP) and Emergency Nurse Practitioners (ENP). The intervention is the care provided by ESPs and ENPs compared to routine treatment by Doctors.

The patients are being followed up at 14 days and 8 weeks post treatment.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe primary aspect of the study will evaluate the clinical outcome of STIs following attendance at an emergency department, and the impact on quality of life. This will be done at baseline, and at 2 and 8 weeks using telephone interviews. The trial is powered to detect differences at the 8-week follow up.

Two validated and reliable functional outcome measures will be use in the trial: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand ( Quick DASH) questionnaire. Quality of life will be measured using the Short Form-12 Health Survey Questionnaire, Version 2 (SF-12v2).
Secondary outcome measuresThe secondary aspect of the study will be an economic analysis identifying, quantifying and comparing the costs of both the emergency department visit and subsequent costs to the individual, NHS and society. Process measures associated with the three different types of healthcare practitioner (e.g. number of patients treated per hour and referral rate) will also be considered.
Overall study start date01/10/2006
Completion date01/10/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit17 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants900
Key inclusion criteria1. Adults (17 years or older), male or female
2. Patients presenting to an ED with a peripheral soft tissue injury with no immediately apparent fracture and is eligible for management by any of the three professional groups
2. Patients who consent to the study
3. All three practitioners working concurrently when the patient is admitted to the emergency department, to enable randomisation
5. A traumatic injury
6. Soft tissue injury less than 72 hours old
7. Patients will be included if they have minor grazes or wounds that require no treatment
Key exclusion criteria1. Systemic disease
2. Recent surgery
3. Previous ongoing injury to extremity
4. Intoxicated patients
5. Patients unable to give informed consent (e.g. dementia)
6. Open wounds/wounds (patient will be included if minor and insignificant)
7. Major deformities
8. Patients requiring opiate analgesia
9. Systemic disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
10. Healing fracture (less than 3 months)
11. Recent soft tissue injury
12. Head injuries (patient will be included if minor and insignificant)
13. Chest/rib injuries (patient will be included if minor and insignificant)
14. Neurovascular deficits
15. Less than 17 years of age
16. Obvious associated fractures
17. Patients who attend the ED when there is no ESP, ENP, doctor service running concurrently
18. Prisoners
Date of first enrolment01/10/2006
Date of final enrolment01/10/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

The Academic Department of Emergency Care,
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of the West of England (UK)
University/education

Faculty of Health and Social Care
Glenside Campus
Blackberry Hill
Stapleton
Bristol
BS16 1DD
England
United Kingdom

Email deb.joy@uwe.ac.uk
Website http:/www.uwe.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02nwg5t34

Funders

Funder type

University/education

University of the West of England (UK) - funded as part of a PhD bursary

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results of pilot study 01/05/2006 Yes No
Results article results 08/11/2012 Yes No
Results article results 03/01/2013 Yes No