Goal-directed therapy: to determine a systematic approach in reducing complications after a cardiac surgery
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN72151906 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN72151906 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | N/A |
- Submission date
- 12/06/2013
- Registration date
- 25/11/2013
- Last edited
- 06/11/2014
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Over 30,000 cardiac surgery operations are performed every year. For the first day or two following surgery, the care provided by the medical and nursing team involves close monitoring of bodily functions and prompt management of any disturbances. Ensuring that the heart and circulation are functioning adequately is important to prevent organs, including kidneys, from failing. The clinical team frequently uses intravenous fluids (fluid injected directly into the vein) to compensate for any fluid losses during and after surgery. Previous studies on patients following major non-cardiac surgery have shown a benefit from increasing the amount of blood pumped around the body by giving intravenous fluids targeted at specific therapeutic goals. This process is called haemodynamic goal-directed therapy (GDT). There have been a smaller number of studies on patients following cardiac surgery and the positive results were similar. We have recently evaluated GDT following cardiac surgery and it was shown to be safe and associated with better kidney function. The aim is to follow this up by looking at a direct link between GDT and reduction in kidney dysfunction. Specifically kidney dysfunction that requires the use of renal replacement therapy.
Who can participate?
Patients over 18 years of age and admitted to intensive care post surgery, who are having coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic valve replacements.
What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to either GDT or the standard therapy that is currently provided is many centres across the UK. Both groups of patients will be monitored closely in the intensive care unit and will have the same level of care. The difference will be in the methods used to guide the administration of intravenous fluids. The standard therapy group will have fluids directed by the clinical team, indicated in accordance with current practice. Patients allocated to the GDT group will have an extra monitoring (cardiac output monitor) to guide the timing and the amount of intravenous fluids administered. The results of this monitor will be concealed from the clinical team but can be revealed if there is any question about patient safety. This process will last for 6 hours from admission to the intensive care unit. We are planning to collect information about kidney function and the amount of time spent in intensive care and hospital. We will have a record of all complications following surgery to help us understand the role of GDT in this group of patients and to ensure safety. A committee composed of specialist doctors independent from the research team, a nurse representative, a statistician and a patient representative will have full access to the information we collect from the study patients. This committee have the authority to stop the study if patients are coming to harm. We would also like to follow up the patient after a year from surgery to assess the study patientsÂ’ long-term outcome.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
If the planned intervention shows an improvement in renal outcome with a positive impact on overall patient experience then a plan to implement GDT is warranted in all future cardiac surgery patients. By participating in this study, patients will contribute to future advances in healthcare.
Where is the study run?
The study is being conducted by St Georges NHS Trust, London in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. Up to 10 participating centres will join this large multicenter randomized controlled trial.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study will be expected to start within the next 12 months.
Who is funding the study?
The funding application is in process.
Who is the main contact?
Rebekah Thomson
Rebekah.thomson@NHS.net
Contact information
Scientific
Cardiac Intensive Care
Atkinson Morley Wing
St Georges Hospital
Blackshaw Road
Tooting
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
| rebekah.thomson@nhs.net |
Study information
| Study design | Multi-centre double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Prevention |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Randomised controlled trial of post-operative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy following a cardiac surgery and the effects on acute kidney injury |
| Study objectives | Maximising stroke volume for 6 hours post cardiac surgery reduces acute kidney injury by increasing renal perfusion. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Complications following cardiac surgery, specifically acute kidney injury and renal function |
| Intervention | Current interventions as of 14/10/2014: Patients in the control group will have routine post-operative care with the standard haemodynamic targets of: 1. Systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline 2. Urine output greater than 0.5 ml/kg/hour 3. Lactate less than 2.0 mmol/L. IV fluid administration will be guided by the clinical team. Cardiac output monitoring will be used but concealed to understand the mechanisms behind the success or failure of GDT. The clinical team can request disclosure of the cardiac output measurements to decide on further management of the patient, should the patient show signs of shock (predefined within the protocol). The intervention group: the protocol will start on admission to intensive care and continue for 6 hours. The main therapeutic goal is to achieve stroke volume maximisation (SVmax) using a cardiac output monitor concealed from the clinical team. A fluid challenge of 250 ml Ringers lactate solution will be administered. Fluid responsiveness is defined by an increase in stroke volume (SV) by equal to or greater than 10%. The fluid challenge will be repeated until the patient is no longer fluid responsive, in order to maintain a perfusion pressure after SVmax, noradrenaline will be used to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg. A further fluid challenge will be given if the stroke volume decreases by 10%. It is difficult to maintain SVmax in the cardiac surgery patient due to the re-warming phase post-operatively and the changes in sedation/analgesia, which ultimately affect stroke volume by changing systemic vascular resistance. Patients also receive cardioplegia intra-operatively and the myocardium slowly recovers affecting the stroke volume, therefore other indicators for fluid challenges have to be considered. If the lactate rises by 1.0 mmol or more, urine output is less than 0.5 ml/kg/hour or systolic arterial pressure drops below 90 mmHg then one further fluid challenge can be given to assess stroke volume, providing no fluid has be administered within the past 30 minutes. If unresponsive, further fluid should not be given and this will trigger the research nurse to seek a medical review if the symptoms persist. Previous interventions: Patients in the control group will have routine post-operative care with the standard haemodynamic targets of: systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline, urine output greater than 0.5 ml/kg/hour and lactate less than 2.0 mmol/L. IV fluid administration will be guided by the clinical team. Cardiac output monitoring will be used to allow comparison of results in the analysis but will be concealed unless the clinical team request disclosure to decide on further management of the patient. The intervention group: the protocol will start on admission to intensive care and continue for 6 hours. The main therapeutic goal is to achieve stroke volume maximisation (SVmax) using a cardiac output monitor concealed from the clinical team. A fluid challenge of 250 ml Ringers lactate solution will be administered. Fluid responsiveness is defined by an increase in stroke volume (SV) by equal to or greater than 10%. The fluid challenge will be repeated until the patient is no longer fluid responsive. A further fluid challenge will be given if the stroke volume decreases by 10%. It is difficult to maintain SVmax in the cardiac surgery patient due to the re-warming phase post-operatively and the changes in sedation/analgesia which ultimately affect stroke volume by changing systemic vascular resistance. Patients also receive cardioplegia intra-operatively and the myocardium slowly recovers affecting the stroke volume, therefore other indicators for fluid challenges had to be considered. If the lactate rises by 1.0 mmol or more, urine output is less than 0.5 ml/kg/hour or systolic arterial pressure drops below 90 mmHg then one further fluid challenge can be given to assess stroke volume. If unresponsive, further fluid should not be given and will trigger the nurse to seek a medical review if the symptoms persist. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | Current primary outcome measures as of 14/10/2014: The primary outcome variable for this study is Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) that requires renal replacement therapy within 7 days following cardiac surgery. Death before day 7 is a competing risk and will be treated in the analysis accordingly. One approach would consist of a multinomial logit model, which deals with unordered multichotomous dependent variables, i.e. both death and AKI. Previous primary outcome measures: The primary outcome variable for this study is Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage 1 or above as defined by the AKIN criteria. Day 3 creatinine, compared to the most recent pre-operative value, will be used. Day of surgery is considered day 0. Death before day 3 is a competing risk and will be treated in the analysis accordingly. One approach would consist of a multinomial logit model, which deals with unordered multichotomous dependent variables, i.e. both death and AKI. |
| Secondary outcome measures | Current secondary outcome measures as of 14/10/2014: 1. AKIN and RIFLE criteria for AKI 2. The incidence of renal replacement therapy within the same hospital admission. This is defined as haemofiltration, haemodialfiltration within intensive care and haemodialysis on the renal dialysis unit 3. Re-admission to intensive care within 30 days of surgery 4. Time to readiness for discharge from intensive care as per unit guidelines 5. Time to medically fit for discharge from hospital as decided by the clinical team. Transfer to another hospital will be considered additional stay in acute care unless transferred for social reasons only 6. Time to actual discharge from hospital 7. Respiratory, infectious, renal, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, haematological, biochemical and wound infections as predefined in the protocol 8. Morbidity and organ failure scores as defined by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) 9. Morbidity scores for ward patients using cardiac postoperative morbidity score (C-POMS) at day 1, day 3, day 5 and day 8 10. In-hospital mortality 11. Mortality at day 30, 6 months and 1 year 12. Health survey at 30 days and 1 year Previous secondary outcome measures: 1. RIFLE criteria: the incidence of renal replacement therapy within the same hospital admission. This is defined as haemofiltration, haemodialfiltration within intensive care and haemodialysis on the renal dialysis unit. 2. Re-admission to intensive care within 30 days of surgery 3. Time to readiness for discharge from intensive care as per unit guidelines 4. Time to medically fit for discharge from hospital as decided by the clinical team. Transfer to another hospital will be considered additional stay in acute care unless transferred for social reasons only. 5. Time to actual discharge from hospital 6. Respiratory, infectious, renal, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, haematological, biochemical and wound infections 7. Morbidity and organ failure scores as defined by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) 8. Morbidity scores for ward patients using cardiac postoperative morbidity score (C-POMS) at day 1, day 3, day 5 and day 8 9. In-hospital mortality 10. Mortality at day 30, day 90, 180 and 360 days following surgery |
| Overall study start date | 01/01/2016 |
| Completion date | 01/07/2018 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | Approximately 4,000-6,000 (to be confirmed) |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR) or combined CABG and AVR 2. Informed consent 3. Admission to intensive care from theatre 4. Patients over 18 years of age |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Myocardial infarction (MI) less than 48 hours prior to surgery 2. Infective endocarditis 3. Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 (end stage renal failure) 4. Cardiogenic shock requiring intra-aortic balloon pump 5. Pulmonary hypertension WHO-FC III/IV 6. Known right ventricular failure 7. Diagnosis of congenital heart disease Added 14/10/2014: 8. Renal replacement therapy prior to surgery within 30 days |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/01/2016 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/07/2018 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
St Georges NHS Trust
Blackshaw Road
Tooting
London
SW17 0QT
England
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)20 8672 1255 |
|---|---|
| lparker@sgul.ac.uk | |
| Website | https://www.stgeorges.nhs.uk/ |
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/039zedc16 |
Funders
Funder type
Other
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
