Effectiveness of intrauterine insemination with ovarian hyperstimulation in couples with an unexplained moderately reduced fertility

ISRCTN ISRCTN72675518
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN72675518
Secondary identifying numbers 1
Submission date
20/12/2005
Registration date
20/12/2005
Last edited
19/10/2007
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mrs P Steures
Scientific

Academic Medical Center
Center of Reproductive Medicine
OFO-project, H4-213
P.O. Box 22660
Amsterdam
1100 DD
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)20 566 3857
Email ofoproject@amc.uva.nl

Study information

Study designMulticentre, randomised, active controlled, parallel group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesThere is no additional benefit of Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) with Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) over expectant management for 6 months in couples with unexplained subfertility and a chance of a spontaneous pregnancy between 30% and 40%. Categorisation of unexplained subfertile couples by their prognosis can identify those couples who benefit from IUI with COH and those who do not.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the local medical ethics committee
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUnexplained Subfertility
InterventionAfter informed consent had been given, couples were randomly allocated between IUI with COH and expectant management for six months.

Couples allocated to IUI with COH started treatment in the next cycle. Controlled ovarian hyper stimulation as well as semen preparation and insemination regimens were performed according to hospital-specific protocols.

Couples allocated to expectant management were followed until an ongoing pregnancy occurred within six months, these pregnancies were finally followed until birth. If no pregnancy occurred, follow-up ended after this period. If a pregnancy miscarried, follow-up continued until the next pregnancy or the end of the six months period.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy within six months. Ongoing pregnancy was defined as the presence of foetal cardiac activity at transvaginal sonography at a gestational age of at least 12 weeks.
Secondary outcome measuresSecondary endpoints were total number of clinical pregnancies, miscarriages and multiple pregnancies.
Overall study start date01/06/2002
Completion date01/07/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants250
Key inclusion criteriaAll subfertile couples in whom no reason is found during the basic fertility work-up for their subfertility and in whom their spontaneous pregnancy chance in the next year, calculated by the results of the basic fertility work-up, is between 30% and 40%.
Key exclusion criteriaAll couples in whom a reason is found for their subfertility or who are having another prognosis calculated
Date of first enrolment01/06/2002
Date of final enrolment01/07/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam
1100 DD
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Academic Medical Centre (AMC) (Netherlands)
University/education

Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam
1105 AZ
Netherlands

Website http://www.amc.uva.nl/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03t4gr691

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (The Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results 15/07/2006 Yes No