A randomised controlled comparison of Campath-Tacrolimus vs IL2R MoAb-Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate as induction-Maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation (protocol SMHREN0501)

ISRCTN ISRCTN73171002
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN73171002
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00246129
Secondary identifying numbers N0016188158
Submission date
28/09/2007
Registration date
28/09/2007
Last edited
17/02/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Adam McLean
Scientific

HHNT Renal Unit
4th Floor Hammersmith House
Hammersmith Hospital
Du Cane Road
London
W12 0HS
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)208 383 5152
Email amclean@hhnt.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled open study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA randomised controlled comparison of Campath-Tacrolimus vs IL2R MoAb-Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate as induction-Maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation (protocol SMHREN0501)
Study objectivesTo determine which of two well established anti-rejection drug combinations has the best outcome in kidney transplantation.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUrological and Genital Diseases: Kidney transplant
InterventionRandomised controlled open study
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Campath-Tacrolimus
Primary outcome measure1. An understanding of the merits of these two anti-rejection treatment combinations.
2. One year survival with a functioning graft
Secondary outcome measures1. Occurrence, severity, and type of infection episodes
2. Initial length of stay in hospital and subsequent admissions
3. Cost over the first year of the two therapies
4. Presence in the blood of cells which might trigger rejection in, or promote tolerance to the graft
5. Early development of scarring in the grafts
6. Graft function
7. Patient survival and graft survival censored for death with function
Overall study start date01/12/2005
Completion date01/12/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants120
Key inclusion criteriaAdults undergoing liver donor or deceased donor kidney transplantation
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients who are unable to give written informed consent
2. Simultaneous kidney/pancreas transplant recipients
3. Non-heart beating deceased donor transplant recipients
3. Patients who would not be offered Campath-1H induction under our current protocol (patients with previous malignancy or with previous exposure to cytotoxic or antiproliferative agents
Date of first enrolment01/12/2005
Date of final enrolment01/12/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Hammersmith Hospital
London
W12 0HS
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)207 307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Hammersmith Hospital NHS Trust

No information available

St Mary's Hospital

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 15/10/2011 Yes No