Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Retrospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Publication status

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Dr Bernd Puschner


Contact details

Ulm University
Department of Psychiatry II
Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2
+49 (0)8221 962 866

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number


Study information

Scientific title

Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness: a multicentre observational longitudinal study



Study hypothesis

The main objective of this project is to develop a methodology to assess the scope and quality of clinical decisions in the care of people with severe mental illness (SMI) from both the patient and clinician perspective, and to specify how and to what degree clinical decision making (CDM) in routine care affects patient behaviour and short- and long-term treatment outcome.

The main study hypotheses are:
1. The quality of CDM is positively related to treatment outcome in the routine care of people with SMI
2. The quality of CDM can be adequately described by taking into account decision making styles, satisfaction with decision making, and type of decision making ("paternalistic" versus "shared" versus "informed")
3. Actual CDM in routine care depends on the context, i.e. varies for different kinds of decisions and is susceptible to change over time
4. The relation between quality of CDM and outcome is affected by a number of covariates

Ethics approval

Ulm University Ethics Commission, 15/12/2008, ref: 241/08

Study design

Multicentre observational longitudinal panel study

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Cohort study

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet

Can be found at


Severe mental illness


Before the start of recruitment, specific instruments were developed to measure CDM style, key elements of CDM in routine care, as well as CDM involvement and satisfaction from patient and therapist perspectives. Together with established instruments to assess outcome, these are being put to use in the longitudinal study in order to examine the study hypothesis. Total duration of observation per subject is 12 months.

Intervention type



Not Applicable

Drug names

Primary outcome measure

Needs (Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule [CANSAS]), measured at timepoints t0 - t6

Secondary outcome measures

1. Quality of life (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life [MANSA]), measured at timepoints t0 - t6
2. Service use (Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - European version [CSSRI]), measured at timepoints t0 and t6
3. Symptomatic impairment (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales [HoNOS] and Outcome Questionnaire [OQ-45]), measured at timepoints t0 and t6

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned (if study stopped)


Participant inclusion criteria

1. Adult, aged 18 - 60 years at intake, either sex
2. Main diagnoses mental disorder of any kind established by case notes or staff communication using Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) (SCID) criteria
3. Presence of severe mental illness based upon validated criteria including symptom severity (Threshold Assessment Grid [TAG] greater than or equal to 5) and illness duration (greater than or equal to 2 years)
4. Expected contact with mental health services (excluding inpatient services) during the time of study participation
5. Sufficient command of the host country's language
6. Capable of giving informed consent

Participant type


Age group




Target number of participants


Participant exclusion criteria

1. Main diagnosis of mental retardation, dementia, substance use or organic brain disorder
2. Cognitive impairment severe enough to make it impossible to give meaningful information on study instruments
3. Treatment by forensic psychiatric services

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment

Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Trial participating centre

Ulm University

Sponsor information


European Commission (Belgium)

Sponsor details

Research Directorate General
Directorate F2 - Public Health
CDMA 2/30

Sponsor type




Funder type


Funder name

Seventh Framework Programme (HEALTH-2007-3.1-4) (ref: 223290)

Alternative name(s)

EC Seventh Framework Programme, European Commission Seventh Framework Programme, EU Seventh Framework Programme, European Union Seventh Framework Programme, FP7

Funding Body Type

government organisation

Funding Body Subtype

National government


Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Participant level data

Not provided at time of registration

Basic results (scientific)

Publication list

2010 protocol in:
2013 results in:
2015 results in:
2015 results in:
2015 results in:
2017 results in:

Publication citations

  1. Protocol

    Puschner B, Steffen S, Slade M, Kaliniecka H, Maj M, Fiorillo A, Munk-Jørgensen P, Larsen JI, Egerházi A, Nemes Z, Rössler W, Kawohl W, Becker T, Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol., BMC Psychiatry, 2010, 10, 90, doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-90.

  2. Results

    Puschner B, Neumann P, Jordan H, Slade M, Fiorillo A, Giacco D, Egerházi A, Ivánka T, Bording MK, Sørensen HØ, Bär A, Kawohl W, Loos S, , Development and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS)., BMC Psychiatry, 2013, 13, 48, doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-48.

  3. Results

    Konrad J, Loos S, Neumann P, Zentner N, Mayer B, Slade M, Jordan H, De Rosa C, Del Vecchio V, Égerházi A, Nagy M, Bording MK, Sørensen HØ, Kawohl W, Rössler W, Puschner B; CEDAR Study Group, Content and implementation of clinical decisions in the routine care of people with severe mental illness, Puschner B, Arnold K, Ay E, Becker T, Konrad J, Neumann P, Loos S, Zentner N, Slade M, Clarke E, Jordan H, Maj M, Fiorillo A, Giacco D, Luciano M, De Rosa C, Sampogna G, Del Vecchio V, Cozzolino P, Del Vecchio HG, Salzano A, Égerházi A, Ivánka T, Nagy M, Berecz R, Glaub T, Süveges Á, Kovacs A, Magyar E, Munk-Jørgensen P, Bording MK, Sørensen HØ, Larsen JI, Kawohl W, Bär A, Rössler W, Krömer S, Mutschler J, Obermann C, 2015, 24, 1, 15-19.

  4. Results

    Clarke E, Puschner B, Jordan H, Williams P, Konrad J, Kawohl W, Bär A, Rössler W, Del Vecchio V, Sampogna G, Nagy M, Süveges A, Krogsgaard Bording M, Slade M., Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice, Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2015, 131, 5, 369-378, doi: 10.1111/acps.12365.

  5. Results

    Courses of helping alliance in the treatment of people with severe mental illness in Europe: a latent class analytic approach, Loos S, Arnold K, Slade M, Jordan H, Del Vecchio V, Sampogna G, Süveges Á, Nagy M, Krogsgaard Bording M, Østermark Sørensen H, Rössler W, Kawohl W, Puschner B; CEDAR study group, 2015, 50, 3, 363-370, doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0963-4.

Additional files

Editorial Notes

25/01/2017: Publication reference added.