Randomised comparison of fluid resuscitation with human albumin solution or normal saline among critically ill patients

ISRCTN ISRCTN76588266
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN76588266
Secondary identifying numbers 153711
Submission date
19/09/2002
Registration date
19/09/2002
Last edited
08/11/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Robyn Norton
Scientific

The George Institute for International Health
Level 24, Maritime Trade Towers
207 Kent Street
Sydney
NSW 2021
Australia

Phone + 61 2 9657 0381
Email rnorton@george.org.au

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleRandomised comparison of fluid resuscitation with human albumin solution or normal saline among critically ill patients
Study acronymSAFE Study (Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation)
Study objectivesWhen 4% albumin is compared to 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline) for intravascular fluid resuscitation in patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) there is no difference in 28-day all-cause mortality.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval at Royal North Shore Hospital (affiliated with the University of Sydney and the Institute for International Health) was issued on 27 November 2000 (protocol ref: 0010-173M). Each participating institution also received ethics approval.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedCritically ill patients requiring intravenous fluid resuscitation
InterventionThe study treatment will be randomly allocated with stratification within the ICU and across the study population for patients admitted for trauma causes or non-trauma causes. Administration of the study treatments will be double blinded. Each eligible participant will be randomised to receive either 4% human albumin or 0.9% sodium chloride.

Co-sponsor for this trial:
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
Level 3, 10 Ievers Terrace
Carlton, Melbourne 3053
Australia
Phone: +61 3 9340 3400
Fax: +61 3 9340 3499
Contact person: Professor Simon Finfer (sfinfer@george.org.au)
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Human albumin solution or normal saline
Primary outcome measureDeath from all causes at 28 days after randomisation
Secondary outcome measures1. Survival time during the first 28 days
2. The proportion of patients with one, two, three, four and five new organ failures (defined as documented change in cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, haematologic or hepatic component of the Sepsis-related Organ Failure [SOFA] score from zero, one or two at base-line to three or four during ICU stay)
3. Duration of mechanical ventilation
4. Duration of renal replacement therapy
5. Duration of ICU and hospital stay
Overall study start date01/01/2003
Completion date31/12/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants7000
Key inclusion criteriaPatients are eligible for inclusion in the study if ALL the following requirements are met:
1. Fluid resuscitation is required for intravascular fluid depletion that is in addition to intravenous fluid that is required for nutrition or to replace ongoing insensible losses, urinary losses, ongoing losses from other sites (e.g., fistula losses from the gastrointestinal tract, urinary losses from diabetes insipidus, cerebral salt wasting syndrome or the polyuric phase of acute renal failure) or to restore normonatraemia
2. The ICU clinician considers that both 4% human albumin solution and 0.9% sodium chloride are equally appropriate for the patient and that no specific indication or contraindication for either exists
3. The requirement for fluid resuscitation must be supported by AT LEAST ONE of the following clinical signs:
a. Heart rate greater than 90 beats/min
b. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) less than 100 mmHg or Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) less than 75 mmHg or a 40 mmHg decrease in SBP or MAP from the baseline recording
c. Central venous pressure less than 10 mmHg
d. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure less than 12 mmHg
e. Respiratory variation in systolic or mean arterial blood pressure of greater than 5 mmHg
f. Capillary refill time greater than one second
g. Urine output less than 0.5 ml/kg for one hour
Key exclusion criteriaPatients are excluded from the study if one or more of the following are present:
1. A known previous adverse reaction to human albumin solution
2. Any known religious objection to the administration of human blood products (for example if patient is a Jehovah’s Witness)
3. A requirement for the patient to receive plasmapheresis during this ICU admission
4. An admission to the ICU following cardiac surgery
5. An admission to the ICU for the treatment of body burn
6. An admission to the ICU following liver transplantation surgery
7. Age less than 18 years
8. Brain death or brain death that is likely to be diagnosed within in the next 24 hours of fluid resuscitation being required
9. If the patient is moribund and expected to die within the next 24 hours - defined as having a treatment limitation order in place that exceeds a ‘not for resuscitation’ order and that indicates the treating clinicians are not committed to full supportive care
10. If the patient has previously been enrolled and has completed follow up in the SAFE study
11. If the patient has previously received fluid resuscitation that was prescribed within the study ICU and during this current ICU admission
12. If the patient has been transferred to the study ICU from a non-study ICU and received a fluid bolus or fluid resuscitation for the treatment of volume depletion in that non-study ICU
Date of first enrolment01/01/2003
Date of final enrolment31/12/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Australia
  • New Zealand

Study participating centre

The George Institute for International Health
Sydney
NSW 2021
Australia

Sponsor information

The George Institute for International Health (Australia)
Research organisation

c/o Professor Simon Finfer
The George Institute for International Health
Level 24, Maritime Trade Towers
207 Kent Street
Sydney
NSW 2021
Australia

Website http://www.thegeorgeinstitute.org
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/023331s46

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Funding has been from several organisations (listed in alphabetical order):

No information available

Auckland Hospital (New Zealand)

No information available

Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care (Australia)

No information available

CSL Limited, Melbourne (Australia)

No information available

Middlemore Hospital, Auckland (New Zealand)

No information available

National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) - three year project grant (ref: 153711)

No information available

National Health Research Council (New Zealand) (ref: 01/386)

No information available

New South Wales Health Department

No information available

Northern Territory Health Services (Australia) - grant from the Australian Health Care Agreement 1998 - 2003 Quality Improvement and Enhancement Funds

No information available

Queensland Health Services Department (Australia)

No information available

Royal Hobart Hospital, Tasmania (Australia)

No information available

South Australia Department of Human Services (Australia)

No information available

Victoria Department of Human Services (Australia)

No information available

Western Australia Health Department (Australia)

No information available

The SAFE study was initiated and designed by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group and the Australian and Red Cross Blood Service. The study design, protocol and procedures have been finalised in collaboration with the Institute for International Health, independently of the aforementioned funding bodies. The data will be collected, analysed and published independent of the funding bodies and a copy of the final report will be distributed to them on completion of the study.

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 18/11/2006 Yes No
Results article 30/08/2007 Yes No

Editorial Notes

08/11/2022: Internal review.