Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Article 20 of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (EU-TPD) states that e-cigarette packets and refill products must carry a health warning of either ‘This product contains nicotine which is a highly addictive substance’, or ‘This product contains nicotine which is a highly addictive substance. It is not recommended for use by non-smokers’.
Given the reduced risks associated with e-cigarettes, UK health and policy makers recommend that smokers who are unwilling or unable to quit should be encouraged to switch to e-cigarettes. However, in recent years, public misperceptions of harm associated with e-cigarettes use have increased, with only 13% of survey respondents in the UK correctly believing that e-cigarettes are considerably less harmful than tobacco smoking.
The purpose of this online experiment is to investigate the potential effects of the EU-TPD health warning labels on e-cigarette products versus a newly generated comparative health message statement on smokers’ and non-smokers’ perceptions of harm and intentions to use e-cigarettes. Additional aims of this study are to measure the effects on smokers' intentions to quit and use e-cigarettes in quit attempts. Lastly, the potential benefits of providing a comparative harm message either in addition to the TPD warning or as a stand-alone message will be explored.
Who can participate?
Adults in the UK who are not current e-cigarette users or ex-smokers
What does the study involves?
This is an online experiment and should take approximately 10 minutes to complete.
After reading the study information and agreeing to take part, participants will be asked to provide some information about themselves and their smoking habits and e-cigarettes use. They will then be asked some questions about how harmful, addictive and acceptable e-cigarettes are and their intentions to use them in the future. This will be followed by viewing several e-cigarette package images which may include either written statements warning about nicotine addictiveness, written statements about health or no written statements at all. Participants will then be asked questions about the images, the written messages and some more questions about their perceptions of e-cigarettes and intentions to use. Finally, participants will be presented with an on-screen debriefing letter explaining the full aims of the study and providing NHS links with useful advice on ways to quit and supporting materials including further information about e-cigarettes.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants will be awarded with points, which they will receive after completing the survey. The number of points can be redeemed in cash or vouchers (i.e. Amazon). Respondents can redeem their cash after cumulating 150 points or more (equating to £15).
The panel recruitment agency MRFGR, a Division of AGENTC Ltd will be responsible for the recruitment and payment of participants. Participants are awarded with points which they receive after completing the survey.
There are no known risks to participants taking part in this study. However, it is possible that the exposure of the images of e-cigarettes may induce an interest in non-smokers/never e-cigarette users to use an e-cigarette. To mitigate against this risk, participants will be fully debriefed about the relative risks of e-cigarettes and warned that these products are not recommended for non-smokers.
Where is the study run from?
London South Bank University (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it being run for?
Who is funding the study?
Cancer Research UK (UK)
Who is the main contact:
1. Catherine Kimber (kimberc3@lsbu.ac.uk)
2. Dr Lynne Dawkins (dawkinl3@lsbu.ac.uk)
Trial website
Contact information
Type
Scientific
Primary contact
Dr Lynne Dawkins
ORCID ID
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-009X
Contact details
Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research
Division of Psychology
School of Applied Sciences
103 Borough road
London South Bank University
London
SE1 0AA
United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 7815 5422
dawkinl3@lsbu.ac.uk
Type
Public
Additional contact
Mrs Catherine Kimber
ORCID ID
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-8640
Contact details
Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research
Division of Psychology
School of Applied Sciences
103 Borough road
London South Bank University
London
SE1 0AA
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 207 815 5447
kimberc3@lsbu.ac.uk
Type
Scientific
Additional contact
Dr Daniel Frings
ORCID ID
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-9516
Contact details
Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research
Division of Psychology
School of Applied Sciences
103 Borough road
London South Bank University
London
SE1 0AA
United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 7815 5888
fringsd@lsbu.ac.uk
Additional identifiers
EudraCT number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
CRUK Grant Number: 25855; Open Science Framework: osf.io/ta4vx
Study information
Scientific title
The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers' and smokers' risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
Acronym
Study hypothesis
This Cancer Research UK (CRUK) funded study will investigate the effects of the TPD e-cigarette health warnings and a comparative harm message on smokers’ and non-smokers’ perceptions of harm, addictiveness and social acceptability of e-cigarettes. Additional aims are to evidence the potential effects of the TPD warnings, as they are implemented, on smokers’ intentions to purchase and use e-cigarettes in future quit attempts. Lastly, the potential benefits of providing a comparative harm message either in addition to the TPD warning or as a stand-alone message will be explored.
Hypothesis 1:
Participants exposed to the TPD health warning will rate e-cigarettes as more harmful and addictive compared to those exposed to the TPD warning combined with a comparative message (TPD+) the comparative health message (COMP) alone and the no message control condition
Hypothesis 2:
For participants exposed to the TPD health warnings, post-exposure scores on intentions to purchase and use e-cigarettes will decrease compared to those exposed to the COMP alone, the TPD+ messages, or no message (control)
Hypothesis 3:
TPD health warnings will decrease quit intentions in smokers and the comparative health message (COMP and TPD+ conditions) will attenuate this effect
For hypotheses 1 and 2 we will explore differences between smokers and non-smokers.
Ethics approval
London South Bank University Ethics Committee, 04/07/2018, reference SAS1815
Study design
Interventional randomised controlled trial
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Randomised controlled trial
Trial setting
Internet
Trial type
Other
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet
Condition
Smoking-related behaviours
Intervention
Block randomisation will be used for allocation of conditions and demographic variables (including smoking status) will be stratified so that the sample of smokers is representative of the target population in line with ONS data. Each participant will be assigned to one of the six conditions to obtain equal group sizes using IBM SPSS. Participants will be exposed to one of six stimuli displayed on screen for a standardised period of 30 seconds. Message statements will be displayed on e-cigarette package images as per the current EU-TPD warning labels on e-cigarette products. Warning label stimuli are:
1. TPD1: TPD health warning as per currently implemented in the UK. “This product contains nicotine which is a highly addictive substance"
2. TPD2: TPD longer health warning as currently implemented in many EU countries: "This product contains nicotine which is a highly addictive substance. It is not recommended for non-smokers"
3. COMP: Comparative health message as generated in the pilot study (using the same parameters used for the TPD warning labels; font, font colour, size and placement on the pack)
4. TPD1+: The TPD health warning (TPD1) in combination with the comparative message (using the same parameters above)
5. TPD2+: The TPD longer health warning (TPD2) in combination with the comparative message (using the same parameters as above).
6. No message: A no message condition using the same e-cigarette packages
There will be no follow-up period and the study experiment will take approximately 10 minutes.
Intervention type
Behavioural
Phase
Drug names
Primary outcome measure
Smokers’ and non-smokers’ perceptions of e-cigarettes associated with:
1. Harm
2. Addictiveness
3. Social acceptability
4. Effectiveness
5. Intention to purchase
6. Intention to use e-cigarettes
This will be assessed at the baseline and at the end of the intervention (after exposure to messages) using a 7-point Likert rating scale with the anchors "Extremely" to "Not at all"
Secondary outcome measures
N/A
Overall trial start date
01/04/2018
Overall trial end date
31/01/2019
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Aged 18 or over
2. Resident in the UK
3. Fluent in English
Participant type
All
Age group
Adult
Gender
Both
Target number of participants
2400 participants will be recruited (1200 smokers and 1200 non-smokers)
Total final enrolment
2495
Participant exclusion criteria
1. Current e-cigarette users (including dual users, those who smoke tobacco cigarettes and use e-cigarettes)
2. Former smokers
Recruitment start date
12/11/2018
Recruitment end date
31/01/2019
Locations
Countries of recruitment
United Kingdom
Trial participating centre
Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University
Division of Psychology
School of Applied Sciences
103 Borough road
London South Bank University
London
SE1 0AA
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Organisation
London South Bank University
Sponsor details
Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research
Division of Psychology
School of Applied Sciences
Room E329; 103 Borough road
London South Bank University
London
SE1 0AA
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 20 7815 6100
supporter.services@cancer.org.uk
Sponsor type
University/education
Website
Funders
Funder type
Not defined
Funder name
Cancer Research UK
Alternative name(s)
CRUK
Funding Body Type
private sector organisation
Funding Body Subtype
Other non-profit organizations
Location
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
We will disseminate a lay summary, explaining our findings and their importance. The findings will be disseminated via open access peer-review publication, conference presentations and press releases, and shared with a number of charities, practitioners and public health and policy organisations via presentations, briefing papers and web-based material. We expect the dissemination of the data to occur some time around end of March, beginning of April.
IPD sharing statement:
The study will use a panel agency that is GDPR (General Data Protection Regulations) compliant. All data will be kept in accordance with the study protocol and with GDPR’s requirements under password protected networked PCs and any documents on hard copies in locked filing cabinets in a locked office. Once finalised, anonymised data will be deposited on the University’s open data repository. The data collected are intended to benefit the general public and to inform policy decision making; we will therefore preserve all data resulting from the study (with the exception of personal data) and make it publically available with as few restrictions as possible. The data will be given a CC-BY license which will require any future users to acknowledge the investigators in any subsequent publications arising from use of the data
Intention to publish date
31/01/2021
Participant level data
Stored in repository
Basic results (scientific)
Publication list
1. 2018 protocol in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30428933
2. 2020 results in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31753541(added 13/01/2020)