A randomised controlled trial of median Sternotomy versus anterolateral left Thoracotomy on morbidity and healthcare resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

ISRCTN ISRCTN77366282
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN77366282
Secondary identifying numbers CS2005/2169
Submission date
14/12/2006
Registration date
09/02/2007
Last edited
03/07/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Gianni Angelini
Scientific

Bristol Heart Institute
University of Bristol
Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary
Marlborough Street
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)117 928 3145
Email g.d.angelini@bristol.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulti-centre open randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study acronymSteT
Study objectivesThe primary hypothesis is that off-pump coronary artery bypass thoracotomy (OPCAB-Th) will reduce post-operative morbidity and the amount of hospital resources used compared to off-pump coronary artery bypass sternotomy (OPCAB-St).
Ethics approval(s)NHS Southmead Research Ethics Committee, 11/08/2006, ref: 06/Q2002/53
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedCoronary artery disease
InterventionCoronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart via a conventional median sternotomy (OPCAB-St) versus coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart via a left anterolateral thoracotomy (OPCAB-Th).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe primary outcome is the time until patients are classified as ‘fit for discharge’. A patient must have a chest X-ray with no evidence of pleural effusion requiring drainage, lung collapse/consolidation or pneumothorax, no suspected infection, normal routine blood tests and temperature in order to be classified as fit for discharge. Susceptibility to bias of these components of the primary outcome will be minimised by documenting objective clinical signs and measurements.
Secondary outcome measures1. Intraoperative measurement of cardiac output measured by Swan-Ganz catheter, when each distal anastomosis is being carried out on the target coronary arteries (consecutive sub-sample only, n = 40)
2. A participant’s judgement about his or her readiness for discharge when the above criteria are met (too soon, about right, could have been discharged earlier)
3. Biochemical inflammatory markers, i.e. complement activation (C3a and C5), interleukin (Interleukin 6 [IL6], Interleukin 8 [IL8] and Interleukin 10 [IL10]); these will be assessed at five time points, i.e. preoperatively, at the end of the operation, and 4, 12 and 24 hours post-operatively (consecutive sub-sample only, n = 60)
4. Alveolar/arterial gradient measured preoperatively (in the anaesthetic room), after extubation, and 1 day after extubation, from arterial blood samples taken through an existing arterial line 5 minutes after administering oxygen by mask, for each of three different oxygen concentrations (consecutive sub-sample only, n = 40)
5. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) preoperatively and at discharge
6. Pain score measured with a 10 cm (0 to 100 mm) visual analogue scale, or by verbal response (0 to 100) if a participant is not well enough to use the visual analogue scale at 2, 12, 24 and 36 hours after extubation and on discharge
7. The total amount (volume and dose) of local anaesthetic (paravertebral block) and patient-controlled analgesia administered; post-operative days on which paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were dispensed
8. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and post-operative hospital stay
9. In-hospital mortality and other standard measures of morbidity, e.g. post-operative myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, arrhythmia, need for haemodynamic support, renal failure and wound infection
10. Use of healthcare resources and associated costs, e.g. duration of operation, ICU/High Dependancy Unit (HDU) and ward stay, additional interventions to treat complications, readmissions
11. Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) preoperatively (preoperative version) and at 3 months (postoperative version)
Overall study start date08/01/2007
Completion date31/12/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants180
Key inclusion criteriaAll adults aged more than 16 years and less than 80 years having non-emergency, scheduled (urgent or elective) first-time off-pump surgery represent the target study population.

Specific inclusion criteria:
1. Aged more than 16 and less than 80 years
2. Undergoing non-emergency, scheduled (urgent or elective) isolated coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump on the beating heart
3. Participating surgeon willing to carry out the operation via either surgical method
Key exclusion criteria1. No previous cardiac surgery
2. No previous lung surgery
3. Not in another invasive research study
Date of first enrolment08/01/2007
Date of final enrolment31/12/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Italy
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Bristol Heart Institute
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

United Bristol NHS Healthcare Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

UBHT Research and Effectiveness Department
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Marlborough Street
Bristol
BS2 8HW
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.ubht.nhs.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04nm1cv11

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Garfield Weston Trust (UK) (ref: 06-07/1001)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/08/2013 Yes No