Do young children need antibiotics when they have a mild or moderate chest infection when they go to a primary care clinician?

ISRCTN ISRCTN79914298
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN79914298
EudraCT/CTIS number 2015-002455-97
Secondary identifying numbers 13381; HTA 13/34/64
Submission date
18/08/2015
Registration date
21/08/2015
Last edited
13/07/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Current plain English summaryas of 26/03/2020:
Background and study aims
Chest infections are one of the commonest infections managed in children seen in GP surgeries. Most children who see the doctor with a chest infection currently get antibiotics. The trouble with prescribing antibiotics for most children is that we are using these medicines too much. This in turn is causing bacteria to become resistant, which is likely to lead in the future to serious infections for our children. The groups of children that are even more likely to get antibiotics at the moment are those who have one or more particular features - phlegm, fever, shortness of breath, or rattly noises heard in the chest when the doctor listens with the stethoscope. It is a real priority to show which groups of children that GPs prescribe for currently benefit from antibiotic treatment and which do not, so that antibiotics can be used appropriately and the effectiveness of antibiotics can be conserved for future generations.

Who can participate?
Children between 6 months and 12 years old with a chest infection.

What does the study involve?
We hope to recruit participants from local general practices across England and Wales. Participant recruitment will be done by a healthcare professional appropriately trained in the study procedures. They will gain consent for each child to take part in the study from a parent or guardian. The healthcare professional will then record some details about the child’s illness. An optional throat swab and a simple measure of blood oxygen will be taken from each participant. Each child will be randomly allocated to an antibiotic (amoxicillin) or a matched placebo (dummy drug). Parents and guardians will be asked to give children one dose of medication three times a day for seven days and to fill in a study diary until the child recovers or 28 days, whichever comes soonest.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The benefit of participating is not yet certain. We do know that a study of chest infections in adults that was very similar to this study showed that adults only got better, on average, one day quicker if they had antibiotics compared to no antibiotics. This is why we are doing this research. Many chest infections are not caused by bacteria but by viruses. Viruses are not killed by antibiotics. We do however know that taking antibiotics adds to what is called Antibiotic Resistance (AMR). This is when bacteria change how they respond to antibiotics and the result is the bacteria become less sensitive and less effective. This change stays within the body for as long as six months after taking even a short course of antibiotics. If we find children do not need antibiotics to recover from chest infections we will be helping everybody who needs these important medicines as we will be saving them for the times we need them in urgent use, as well as saving children from unnecessary antibiotic side effects.

Where is the study run from?
University of Southampton, University of Oxford, Cardiff University and University of Bristol (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2016 to September 2021

Who is funding the study?
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK), reference HTA 13/34/64

Who is the main contact?
Dr Kim Harman
Prof Paul Little

Previous plain English summary:
Background and study aims
Chest infections are one of the commonest infections managed in children seen in GP surgeries. Most children who see the doctor with a chest infection currently get antibiotics. The trouble with prescribing antibiotics for most children is that we are using these medicines too much. This in turn is causing bacteria to become resistant, which is likely to lead in the future to serious infections for our children. The groups of children that are even more likely to get antibiotics at the moment are those who have one or more particular features - phlegm, fever, shortness of breath, or rattly noises heard in the chest when the doctor listens with the stethoscope. It is a real priority to show which groups of children that GPs prescribe for currently benefit from antibiotic treatment and which do not, so that antibiotics can be used appropriately and the effectiveness of antibiotics can be conserved for future generations.

Who can participate?
Children between 6 months and 12 years old with a chest infection.

What does the study involve?
We hope to recruit participants from local general practices across England and Wales. Participant recruitment will be done by a healthcare professional appropriately trained in the study procedures. They will gain consent for each child to take part in the study from a parent or guardian. The healthcare professional will then record some details about the child’s illness. An optional blood sample, throat swab, simple measure of blood oxygen and x-ray will be taken from each participant. Each child will be randomly allocated to an antibiotic (amoxicillin) or a matched placebo (dummy drug). Parents and guardians will be asked to give children one dose of medication three times a day for seven days and to fill in a study diary until the child recovers or 28 days, whichever comes soonest.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The benefit of participating is not yet certain. We do know that a study of chest infections in adults that was very similar to this study showed that adults only got better, on average, one day quicker if they had antibiotics compared to no antibiotics. This is why we are doing this research. Many chest infections are not caused by bacteria but by viruses. Viruses are not killed by antibiotics. We do however know that taking antibiotics adds to what is called Antibiotic Resistance (AMR). This is when bacteria change how they respond to antibiotics and the result is the bacteria become less sensitive and less effective. This change stays within the body for as long as six months after taking even a short course of antibiotics. If we find children do not need antibiotics to recover from chest infections we will be helping everybody who needs these important medicines as we will be saving them for the times we need them in urgent use, as well as saving children from unnecessary antibiotic side effects.

Where is the study run from?
University of Southampton, University of Oxford, Cardiff University and University of Bristol (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2016 to September 2021

Who is funding the study?
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK), reference HTA 13/34/64

Who is the main contact?
Dr Kim Harman
Prof Paul Little

Contact information

Miss Natalie Thompson
Public

School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education
University of Southampton
Aldermoor Health Centre
Aldermoor Close
Southampton
SO16 5ST
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)2380 002380
Email artic-pc@soton.ac.uk
Prof Paul Little
Scientific

Primary Care & Population Science
Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton
Aldermoor Health Centre
Aldermoor Close
Southampton
SO16 5ST
United Kingdom

Miss Natalie Thompson
Scientific

School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education
University of Southampton
Aldermoor Health Centre
Aldermoor Close
Southampton
SO16 5ST
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)2380 002380
Email N.Thompson@soton.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial, with an observational study for participants ineligible for the trial (e.g. where pneumonia is suspected clinically) or where participants are unwilling to be randomised
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleAntibiotics for lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Children presenting in Primary Care (ARTIC PC)
Study acronymARTIC PC
Study objectivesAcute respiratory infections are among the commonest conditions managed in primary care. The Department of Health recognises that antibiotic resistance is an increasingly serious public health problem in England, Europe and the world, with rising resistance rates for a range of antibiotics and a clear relationship between primary care antibiotic prescribing (responsible for 80% of prescribing) and antibiotic resistance.

We are aware of no randomised placebo-controlled trials available to either support or dispute the common use of antibiotics in children with chest infections. Because of the lack of evidence in children it is difficult for GPs to go against the rising tide of antibiotic use to reduce prescribing antibiotics for children. Symptomatic predictors of prescribing include productive cough (‘wet' cough/rattly chest/sputum), shortness of breath, audible wheeze and fever, which are present in between 30% and 65% of children presenting with chest infections. However, a study looking at the average effect of antibiotics would provide unconvincing evidence to persuade healthcare professionals not to prescribe, as all healthcare professionals tend to prescribe in the face of uncertainty, giving patents the ‘benefit of the doubt’, and continue prescribing to particular subgroups according to their own ad hoc criteria. Thus it is necessary to study the heterogeneity of these children with acute cough and explore whether clinical and pathophysiological determinants identify subgroups where antibiotic treatment is or is not effective.

Our aim is to provide evidence to inform the use of antibiotics for the management of chest infections in children. The objectives are:
1. To estimate the effectiveness of amoxicillin overall and in key clinical subgroups of children presenting with uncomplicated (non-pneumonic) lower respiratory tract infection in primary care
2. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of antibiotics overall and in key clinical subgroups of children presenting with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection in primary care.

Added 28/07/2016:
Our provisionally agreed list is children with:
1. Sputum seen and/or heard by parents (’rattly chest’) or clinicians
2. History of fever
3. Physician rating of being unwell
4. Shortness of breath
5. Chest signs (non-focal coarse crepitations/rhonchi/wheeze)
The list of agreed primary and secondary subgroups will be finalised prior to agreeing the detailed analysis plan. The final list will take account of any new evidence and consensus among the study team, and the decision will be made blind to intervention group status.

3. To explore the estimates of effectiveness according to key pathophysiological subgroups (the presence of bacterial pathogens; raised C reactive protein measurement or white cell count; the presence of clinically undetected consolidation on X ray; oximetry; lung function)

On the assumption that the trial might demonstrate moderate benefit of antibiotic both overall and among subgroups, the potential benefits of the trial might include:
1. Reduced medicalisation and fewer unnecessary GP consultations in future episodes of LRTI
2. Reduced risk of anti-microbial resistance
3. Improved quality of care by providing evidence-based information to patients (parents) and reduced unwanted side effects in children

More details can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/133464
Protocol can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/164582/PRO-13-34-64.pdf
Ethics approval(s)South West - Central Bristol Research Ethics Committee, 21/03/2016, ref: 15/SW/0300
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLower Respiratory Tract Infection in children aged 6 months - 12 years
InterventionAmoxicillin 50mg/kg/24 hours (in divided doses for 7 days) or placebo
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase IV
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Amoxicillin
Primary outcome measureCurrent primary outcome measure as of 26/07/2016:
Duration of moderately bad chest infection symptoms (from validated symptom diary; where the diary is not returned using a brief questionnaire completed either by post or by phone)

Previous primary outcome measure:
Duration of moderately bad symptoms (from validated symptom diary)
Secondary outcome measuresCurrent secondary outcome measures as of 26/07/2016:
1. Symptom severity (days 2-4) (measured as with the 1y outcome); duration of symptoms until little or no problem (measured as with the primary outcome); re-consultation with non-resolving, new or worsening symptoms (from structured review of medical records); complications (from structured review of medical records)
2. Health-related quality of life will be measured by proxy methods in which the EuroQoL (EQ5D 5Y) will be completed by patients or carers (on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28)
3. Follow-up (at 1 month): measure lung function (if aged 6+; using PEFR meter)

Previous secondary outcome measures from 23/03/2016 to 26/07/2016:
1. Symptom severity (days 2-4); the development of new or worsening symptoms; complications
2. Health-related quality of life will be measured by proxy methods in which the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and EuroQoL (EQ5D) will be completed by patients or carers (on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28)
3. Follow-up (at 1 month): measure lung function (if aged 6+)

Original secondary outcome measures:
1. Symptom severity (days 2-4); the development of new or worsening symptoms; complications
2. Health-related quality of life will be measured by proxy methods in which The Health Utilities Index (HUI-Mark III) and EuroQoL (EQ5D) will be completed by patients or carers (on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28)
3. Follow-up (at 1 month): measure lung function (if aged 6+)
Overall study start date01/07/2016
Completion date17/04/2020

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit6 Months
Upper age limit12 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants503 in the RCT
Total final enrolment438
Key inclusion criteriaChildren between 6 months and 12 years old presenting with an acute lower respiratory infection (LRTI), defined as an acute cough as the predominant symptom, judged by the GP to be infective in origin, lasting <21 days, and with other symptoms or signs localising to the lower tract (shortness of breath, sputum, pain)

Added 26/07/2016:
Individuals who are allergic to penicillin, who cannot be randomised (e.g. with known immune deficiency, or where a complication such as pneumonia is suspected on clinical grounds), or are unwilling to be randomised, are still eligible for the observational study where the same outcomes will be measured.
Key exclusion criteria1. The cough is judged by the clinician to have a non-infectious aetiology (e.g., hayfever or non-infective exacerbation of asthma) or almost certain viral aetiology (croup, where antibiotics are not commonly prescribed)
2. Immune-compromised
3. Antibiotic use in previous 30 days
4. For the trial, suspected pneumonia based on clinical examination or being very severely ill as judged by the GP is an exclusion (but such children can still enter the observational study which will allow for an assessment of trial participants’ external validity)
5. Only one child from each household will be recruited
Date of first enrolment01/08/2016
Date of final enrolment17/04/2020

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom
  • Wales

Study participating centres

University of Southampton
Southampton
SO16 5ST
United Kingdom
University of Oxford
Oxford
OX2 6GG
United Kingdom
Cardiff University
Cardiff
CF14 4XN
United Kingdom
University of Bristol
Bristol
BS8 2PS
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Southampton (UK)
University/education

Research and Innovation Services Building 28
Highfield Campus
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01ryk1543

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/06/2022
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planFor anyone asking where the request is reasonable we will release the data; in the unlikely case where we feel the request is not reasonable we will ask the NIHR to arbitrate.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file version v10.0 03/06/2019 26/03/2020 No No
Results article 22/09/2021 27/09/2021 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No
Results article 01/06/2023 13/07/2023 Yes No

Additional files

ISRCTN79914298_Protocol_v10.0_03June2019.pdf
Uploaded 26/03/2020

Editorial Notes

13/07/2023: Publication reference added.
27/09/2021: Publication reference added.
23/06/2020: The final enrolment number was added.
04/05/2020: The following changes have been made:
1. The recruitment end date has been changed from 30/06/2020 to 17/04/2020.
2. The overall trial end date has been changed from 01/09/2021 to 17/04/2020.
3. The public contact has been changed.
25/03/2020: The following changes have been made:
1. A scientific contact has been added.
2. The sponsor contact details have been updated.
3. Uploaded protocol Version 10.0 03 June 2019 (not peer reviewed)
4. The plain English summary has been updated.
08/07/2019: The target number of participants was changed from 938 to 503.
03/07/2019: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was updated from 30/06/2019 to 30/06/2020.
2. The overall trial end date was updated from 01/09/2020 to 01/09/2021.
3. The intention to publish date was updated 30/06/2021 to 30/06/2022.
30/05/2019: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was updated from 31/03/2019 to 30/06/2019.
2. The overall trial end date was updated from 30/06/2019 to 01/09/2020.
3. The intention to publish date was updated from 01/05/2019 to 30/06/2021.
4. The publication and dissemination plan was added.
22/01/2019: The recruitment end date was updated from 31/08/2018 to 31/03/2019.
08/10/2018: The public contact was updated.
01/04/2016: the target number of participants was changed from 1122 to 938, the latter reflecting the sample size agreed with the HTA. .
24/03/2016: Ethics approval information added.
23/03/2016: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial start date was changed from 01/11/2015 to 01/07/2016.
2. The overall trial end date was changed from 30/11/2018 to 30/06/2019.
3. The recruitment start date was changed from 01/11/2015 to 01/08/2016.
4. The target number of participants was changed from 938 to 1122.