Comparative evaluation of immunogenicity of Monovalent Type 1 Oral Poliovirus Vaccine (mOPV1) versus trivalent OPV (tOPV): a randomised double-blind trial set in India (Panacea Biotec Ltd mOPV1 study)

ISRCTN ISRCTN80143849
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80143849
Secondary identifying numbers RPC133/Panbio/CR/0982004/CT
Submission date
01/02/2006
Registration date
01/02/2006
Last edited
17/01/2012
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Anna-Lea Jenny Kahn
Scientific

World Health Organization
20, Avenue Appia
Geneva-27
CH 1211
Switzerland

Phone +41 (0)22 791 3135
Email kahna@who.int

Study information

Study designClinical trial, evaluation based, randomised double blind trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typePrevention
Scientific title
Study objectivesOne dose of mOPV1 induces significantly higher levels of seroconversion against poliovirus type 1 among Indian children in Indore and Hyderabad compared to tOPV.

Please note that as of 18/10/2007 the anticipated end date of this trial was updated from the 31st December 2006 to 28th March 2006.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received on the 20th October 2005.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPolio
InterventionMonovalent Type 1 Oral Poliovirus Vaccine (mOPV1) versus Trivalent OPV (tOPV).

Measurements:
1. Cord blood will be collected immediately after birth
2. Blood collection at 30 days of age and stool collection taken
3. During one week follow-up, stool sample collected at day 7
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Monovalent Type 1 Oral Poliovirus Vaccine (mOPV1), Trivalent OPV (tOPV).
Primary outcome measureSeroconversion after 30 days of a single dose of tOPV or mOPV1 produced for Biofarma bulk.
Secondary outcome measures1. Prevalence of excretion of Poliovirus type 1 in stool specimens 7 days post-challenge with mOPV1 (age: 30 days + 7 days)
2. Comparison of mOPV1 produced by Biofarma bulk with the mOPV1 produced by Sanofi Pasteur bulk
Overall study start date25/10/2005
Completion date28/03/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNeonate
SexBoth
Target number of participants600
Key inclusion criteria1. Healthy newborns (greater than or equal to 2.75 kg birth weight, apgar score at 5 minutes, greater than or equal to 9) at the study site(s) (large maternity hospitals)
2. Residing within a relatively short and easily accessible distance (less than 30 km)
3. Not planning to travel away during entire the study period (birth - 2 months)
Key exclusion criteria1. Newborns requiring hospitalisation
2. Birth weight below 2.75 kg
3. Apgar score at 5 minutes less than 9
4. Residence greater than 30 km from study site
5. Families expecting to be absent during the 60-day study period
6. A diagnosis or suspicion of immunodeficiency disorder (either in the participant or in a member of the immediate family) will render the newborn ineligible for the study
Date of first enrolment25/10/2005
Date of final enrolment28/03/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • India
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

World Health Organization
Geneva-27
CH 1211
Switzerland

Sponsor information

Panacea Biotec Ltd (India)
Industry

B-1 Extn. A-27
Mohan Co-op Industrial Estate
Mathura Road
New Delhi
110044
India

Email arani@pblintranet.com
Website http://www.panacea-biotec.com/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01ew11x49

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Gates Foundation (USA) - grant received for a World Health Organization (WHO) Polio Eradication Initiative

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 05/08/2011 Yes No