Double Blind Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial of Oral Co-trimoxazole in Pulmonary Fibrosis

ISRCTN ISRCTN80334919
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80334919
Secondary identifying numbers UK study number for local regional ethical committee (LREC) 64/99
Submission date
25/08/2005
Registration date
09/09/2005
Last edited
05/07/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Veronica Varney
Scientific

St Helier Hospital
Wrythe Lane
Carshalton
SM5 1AA
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 8296 2401
Email vvarney@epsom-sthelier.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleDouble Blind Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial of Oral Co-trimoxazole in Pulmonary Fibrosis
Study acronymSeptrin and CFA
Study objectivesOral Co-trimoxazole improves exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary fibrosis
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (UIP/NSIP/Mixed)
InterventionInvestigations prior to selection and randomisation:
All selected patients underwent baseline investigations before entry. This included:
1. Arterial gases at rest (on air)
2. Pulmonary function tests (laboratory measurement of TLC, DLCO)
3. St George’s Hospital respiratory questionnaire (SGHRQ), and MRC 5 Point Dyspnoea Score
4. Two shuttle-walking tests (2 weeks apart) demonstrating oxygen desaturation below 90% (either during or upon cessation of exercise)
5. An echocardiogram and ECG
6. Routine bloods tests including serum samples for cytokine measurements
7. Sputum samples for pneumocystis silver stain at request of Ethics Committee

Randomisation:
Patients were randomly allocated to active or placebo treatments by our clinical trials pharmacist, using computer generated random numbers. This assigned patients to study treatment groups, with a patient number. The study was conducted double blind. To preserve the double blind status of the trial, medication was issued by the pharmacist; using identical placebo tablets and labelling to ensure all treatment packs were identical.

Drug Treatment:
Co-trimoxazole or identical placebo (480 mg) tablets were supplied with dosage according to body-weight. Patients up to 70 kg received 960 mg bd, those above 70 kg, took 1440 mg (3 x 480 mg) bd. Folic acid 5 mg was given 3 times a week (minimum dose) to protect the bone marrow. Ranitidine 150 mg bd was supplied but optional for any indigestion. Patients on oral daily prednisolone had no adjustments to their prednisolone dose throughout the double blind study, except that permitted during a viral illness.

Assessment during Study:
On entry to the study all patients made visits for the following assessments every 2 weeks:
1. Body-weight
2. Resting respiratory rate and chest auscultation
3. FVC
4. Oxygen saturations at rest and during shuttle walking test and recovery recorded by Pulsox 3i wrist watch Minolta range
5. MRC-5 Point Dyspnoea Score
6. Compliance with treatment/side effects/study withdrawal and deaths were assessed and recorded
7. Blood tests (FBC, U & E, LFT’s, ESR and CRP)
At 3 months all patients had arterial gases, full pulmonary function tests, serum cytokines and SGHRQ, repeated. Six weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (rehab) was then commenced. Two weeks post rehabilitation final assessments were made before decoding. These assessments were identical to the regular 2 week assessments during the study.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Co-trimoxazole
Primary outcome measureExercise capacity (shuttle walking test) with area under the curve oxygen desaturation
Secondary outcome measures1. Respiratory function tests (FVC, TLC, DLCO)
2. Arterial oxygen measurements
3. Quality of life data
4. Benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation
Twenty patients were selected.
Overall study start date21/02/2000
Completion date01/02/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants20
Key inclusion criteria1. Male or female below 85 years old
2. Demonstrated breathlessness with oxygen desaturation below 90% on two baseline shuttle walking tests (SWT)
3. Physical examination, HRCT scan and pulmonary function test results compatible with IPF (with or without histological diagnosis)
4. New diagnosis of IPF without treatment or previous diagnosis on regular daily prednisolone
5. Symptoms of exertional dyspnoea affecting life quality
6. Normal glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase levels to avoid drug induced haemolysis. Normal vitamin B12 levels
Key exclusion criteria1. Recognised secondary causes of pulmonary fibrosis
2. Co-trimoxazole allergy or severe upper GI symptoms
3. Abnormal liver function tests or concurrent drug treatments that disturb liver function including azathioprine
4. Inability to perform the shuttle test due to musculoskeletal or cardiac causes
Date of first enrolment21/02/2000
Date of final enrolment01/02/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

St Helier Hospital
Carshalton
SM5 1AA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

The Peel Trust Fund (UK)
Charity

Sceptre Court
40 Tower Hill
Gloucester
GL1 3NN
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05ag50972

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Part funded by The Peel Trust Fund for funding of placebo and Co-trimoxazole drugs only

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/05/2008 Yes No

Editorial Notes

05/07/2018: Publication reference added.