A comparative study of the therapeutic effects of continuous and pulsed laser light on wound healing rates.

ISRCTN ISRCTN80835416
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80835416
Secondary identifying numbers N0050058361
Submission date
30/09/2005
Registration date
30/09/2005
Last edited
25/08/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Peter Vowden
Scientific

Department of Vascular Surgery
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Duckworth Lane
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1274 364466
Email peter.vowden@bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designDouble-blinded randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific title
Study objectivesThe study will investigate whether the effect of pulsed infra-red (IR) laser illumination of wounds can be distinguished from placebo therapy and continuous laser IR illumination and if the responses to pulsed laser therapy correlate with the responses to frequencies used in an earlier study of pulsed electromagnetic fields.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedInjury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning: Wound healing
Intervention80 minimum in four groups each of 20 subjects:
A will be the control group, receiving no IR therapy.
B will receive IR laser therapy pulsed at 292 Hz.
C will receive IR laser therapy pulsed at 700 Hz.
D will receive continuous IR laser illumination.

Each subject will be assessed on recruitment to the study and given a treatment session twice per week for four weeks. This will be followed by a 4-week observation period ending with the final assessment. After the initial assessment, subjects will be assessed at the ends of weeks 1 - 4 and 8 with a follow-up observation at the end of week 13. Patients' subjective comments will be sought throughout.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe study will test the 'null hypotheses' that there are no significant differences between the control group and any other group at the 95% confidence level.
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date06/07/1999
Completion date31/07/2003

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants80 minimum in four groups each of 20 subjects
Key inclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment06/07/1999
Date of final enrolment31/07/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Vascular Surgery
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Department of Health
Government

Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Government

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Abstract results 01/09/2003 No No