Double-blind (practitioner-patient masking) trial of acupuncture needles: does patient reaction reveal needle authenticity?

ISRCTN ISRCTN81864187
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN81864187
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
15/05/2008
Registration date
03/07/2008
Last edited
03/07/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Nobuari Takakura
Scientific

20-1 Sakuragaoka-Machi
Shibuya-ku
Tokyo
150-0031
Japan

Study information

Study designDouble-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleResearch for effects of acupuncture stimulation on somatosensory function and somatic nerve reflex
Study objectivesIn our previous study (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17925042) we demonstrated that the penetrating and non-penetrating needles that we have developed can successfully be used to conduct a practitioner-blinded acupuncture trial. However, it is possible that the penetrating needle occasionally elicits pain in the patient, and the reaction of the patient can reveal the authenticity of the needle to the practitioner. In the current study, we aimed to determine the frequency in which the pain elicited by the penetrating needle and the reaction of the patient reveal authenticity of the needle to the practitioner.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the Ethics Committee of Showa University, School of Medicine on the 24th December 1999 (ref: 65).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedHealthy subjects
Intervention24 men and 6 women were recruited, mean (SD) age = 31.0 (9.8) years.

This study was conducted to determine the frequency in which the penetrating needle elicits pain in the participant, and whether the participant reaction to the pain serves as a significant clue in revealing the authenticity of the needle in a practitioner-blinded acupuncture trial.

In this trial, although only penetrating needles were actually provided, the acupuncturist was told that he was provided with a mixture of penetrating and non-penetrating needles. The acupuncturist then applied a pair of needles at the bilateral TE-5 points, one needle on each side, in the 30 subjects using the alternating twirling technique. Following each needle application, the acupuncturist recorded whether he thought the needle was a penetrating or non-penetrating needle, and the clues that led him to his decision (e.g., the participant's facial expression, body movement, verbal expression) and the level of confidence in his decision.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe practitoner recorded the following after each needle application:
1. Clues that led to acupuncturist's identification of authenticity of the needle, these included facial expression, body movement, verbal expression, bleeding, and no bleeding, in addition to the feeling of needle insertion and feeling of needle removal.
2. Acupuncturist's confidence in identification of needle authenticity (i.e., the degree of certainty about his judgment) on a numerical rating scale (0 for no confidence and 100 for complete confidence)
Secondary outcome measuresSubjects' identification of the authenticity of the needles.
Overall study start date01/09/2002
Completion date25/12/2002

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Healthy volunteer
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants30
Key inclusion criteria1. Both males and females
2. Healthy volunteers
3. Age range: 18 - 55 years
Key exclusion criteriaUnhealthy volunteers
Date of first enrolment01/09/2002
Date of final enrolment25/12/2002

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Japan

Study participating centre

20-1 Sakuragaoka-Machi
Tokyo
150-0031
Japan

Sponsor information

Hanada College (Japan)
University/education

20-1 Sakuragaoka-Machi
Shibuya-ku
Tokyo
150-0031
Japan

Phone +81 (0)3 3461 4787
Email m-hanada@hanada.ac.jp
Website http://www.hanada.ac.jp
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0373a6k33

Funders

Funder type

University/education

Hanada College (Japan)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan