Clinical trial of insoles for pain at the front of the knee
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN84641129 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN84641129 |
| Protocol serial number | CT223 |
| Sponsor | SSL International (UK) |
| Funder | SSL International (UK) |
- Submission date
- 23/04/2008
- Registration date
- 31/07/2008
- Last edited
- 06/05/2016
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Christopher Nester
Scientific
Scientific
Director
Centre for Rehabilitation & Human Performance Research
Brian Blatchford Building
University of Salford
Salford
M6 6PU
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)161 295 2275 |
|---|---|
| c.j.nester@salford.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised subject-blinded single-centre trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of insoles to treat anterior knee (patella femoral) pain |
| Study acronym | KP Trial |
| Study objectives | Knee pain remains a significant burden to a large proportion of the population. It has a multifactorial etiology and diagnosis is often non specific. Anterior knee pain (patellofemoral pain syndrome) has been described as the most prevalent disorder of the knee. The cause of the condition is not clearly understood and the cause of pain may not be the same for each person. Hence a variety of treatment regimes (devices) are employed for the treatment of the condition. Citizens are likely to seek their own approaches to managing knee pain prior whilst waiting for, or instead of, seeking advice and remedy from the health services. This trial will seek to evaluate the effectiveness of an in shoe type of orthosis in the management of anterior knee pain. Hypothesis: a functional insole will produce greater improvements in knee pain compared to a sham control group. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Ethics Committee, University of Salford, 12/03/2008, ref: 07/054 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Anterior knee pain |
| Intervention | The participants will be randomly allocated to the following two arms: 1. Arm 1: Orthaheel® regular. This is a 3/4 length insole with arch shape. It is inserted into shoes and worn daily for 12 months 2. Arm 2: Sham control insole. This is a full length 3 mm deep soft flat insole. It is inserted into shoes and worn daily for 12 months |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
1. Knee pain |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Use of insoles (in time) |
| Completion date | 31/07/2009 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 100 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Male or female participants between the ages of 18 and 65 years old 2. Participants with self-reported anterior knee pain (pain at the front of the knee) with a minimum of 4 weeks duration 3. Participants with self-reported anterior knee pain who score at least 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain 4. Participants with self-reported anterior knee pain in the 2 days prior to recruitment 5. Participants who agree to wear the insoles provided for at least 4 hours each day and complete diary cards and postal questionnaire as required 6. Participants who give written informed consent |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients must not report any acute injury to the knee at the onset of their anterior knee pain 2. Patients must not report posterior or medial/lateral knee pain or any secondary pain elsewhere in lower limb joints since the onset of anterior knee pain 3. Patients must not have any significant diagnosed musculo-skeletal disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes or osteoarthritis of the knee or deterioration dysfunction of associated structures of the knee e.g., cartilage or any other condition associated with sensory and motor dysfunction 4. Patients must not have received or self administered treatment for the knee pain in the previous 4 weeks 5. Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding 6. Patients who have received or self-administered treatment for the knee pain in the previous 4 weeks 7. Patients who have received corticosteroid injection therapy in the knee in the previous 3 months 8. Patients that were previously in this study 9. Patients that were in another study within the last 3 months |
| Date of first enrolment | 28/03/2008 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/07/2009 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Director
Salford
M6 6PU
United Kingdom
M6 6PU
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
06/05/2016: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.