A randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patient and carer satisfaction associated with different levels of intensity of community rehabilitation

ISRCTN ISRCTN87368849
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN87368849
Secondary identifying numbers RBG 99XX7
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
28/10/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Pam Enderby
Scientific

Centre for Ageing and Rehabilitation Studies
Community Sciences Centre
Northern General Hospital NHS Trust
Herries Road
Sheffield
S5 7AU
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)114 271 5916
Email p.m.enderby@sheffield.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeQuality of life
Scientific titleA randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patient and carer satisfaction associated with different levels of intensity of community rehabilitation
Study objectivesEvaluate and compare the levels of impairment, disability, handicap and well-being among elderly patients receiving either a supplemented CRT service or non-intensive CRT service following stroke or fractured neck of femur. Evaluate and compare the costs, both direct and indirect, of providing intensive community rehabilitation and non-intensive community rehabilitation for elderly patients following stroke or fractured neck of femur. Evaluate and compare levels of patient and informal carer satisfaction with intensive community rehabilitation and non-intensive community rehabilitation. Estimate the cost effectiveness of intensive community rehabilitation intervention versus non-intensive community rehabilitation for elderly patients following stroke or fractured neck of femur.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedStroke or fractured neck of femur
Interventioni. Intensive community rehabilitation service
ii. Standard care
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureDeath at 3 and 12 months. Institutionalisation at 3 and 12 months. Length of stay. Re-admission rates. Use of GP services. Use of other health services. Use of social services.
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/01/2000
Completion date31/12/2002

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target number of participantsNot provided at time of registration
Key inclusion criteriaPatients aged 65 plus, admitted from their own home to either the Central Sheffield University Hospital or Northern General Hospital following a 'first' stroke or fractured neck of femur.
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment01/01/2000
Date of final enrolment31/12/2002

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Centre for Ageing and Rehabilitation Studies
Sheffield
S5 7AU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

NHS Executive Trent (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

28/10/2016: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator