Treatment of Diabetic Foot Wounds by Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC®)
ISRCTN | ISRCTN90301130 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN90301130 |
Secondary identifying numbers | DRKS00000059 |
- Submission date
- 13/07/2010
- Registration date
- 29/07/2010
- Last edited
- 29/07/2010
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Ms Dörthe Seidel
Scientific
Scientific
Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin
Private Universität Witten / Herdecke gGmbH
Ostmerheimerstraße 200 Haus 38
Köln
51109
Germany
Phone | +49 (0) 221 9895719 |
---|---|
doerthe.seidel@uni-wh.de |
Study information
Study design | Multicentre randomised controlled clinical superiority trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | Treatment of Diabetic Foot Wounds by Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC®): A multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
Study acronym | DiaFoVAC |
Study objectives | This randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing vacuum-assisted closure and conventional moist wound therapy (CMWT) for diabetic foot wounds was designed in order to: 1. Prove that VAC® therapy leads to complete healing of diabetic foot wounds more of-ten and earlier as compared to conventional moist wound therapy 2. Show that VAC® therapy is safe and effective also when provided in an ambulatory care setting 3. Generate more data on optimal patient selection and optimal combination of VAC® therapy with surgical closure |
Ethics approval(s) | The local ethics committee (Ethik-Kommission der Universität Witten/Herdecke) approved on the 8th of May 2009 (ref: 12/2009) |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Diabetic foot syndrome / chronic or amputational diabetic foot wound / wound treatment |
Intervention | Participants will be randomised to receive either: 1. Intervention: Vacuum-assisted-closure® based on negative pressure wound therapy (V.A.C® NPWT) 2. Control / Comparator: Conventional Moist Wound Therapy (CMWT) according to current available evidence based guidelines |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Time until complete (100%) wound closure, defined by the following criteria: 1. Full (100%) re-tepithelialization of the wound (i.e. no granulation tissue visible) 2. No drainage 3. No need for wound dressing |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Clinical endpoints 1.1. Wound size (area of wound opening, maximal length and width) 1.2. Composition of wound tissue (percentage of epithelia layer, granulation tissue and fibrin) 1.3. Pain in wound surrounding (until wound closure and at 12 months) 1.4. Incidence and time of wound bed preparation 1.5. Secondary resections and amputations 1.6. Recurrence of wound or ulcer at same site 1.7. Complication rates (local and systemic) 1.8. Total complication rate 1.9. Mortality of any cause (within 12 month) 2. Health economic endpoints 2.1. Number of dressing changes 2.2. Length of treatment 2.3. Length of hospital stay 2.4. Time until orthopedic footwear supply possible 2.5. Time until return to work 2.6. Quality-of-life during treatment 2.7. Quality of life after Healing (at 6 and 12 months) 2.8. Patient satisfaction 2.9. Costs (in and out hospital) |
Overall study start date | 01/06/2011 |
Completion date | 30/09/2013 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 300 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Evidence of diabetes mellitus type I, II or III as defined by the necessity for antidiabetic drugs for ≥ 12 months 2. All wounds corresponded to University of Texas grade 2 or 3 in depth 2.1. either a chronic wound which is planned to receive radical surgical debridement 2.2. or an amputational wound which results from a planned below-ankle amputation 3. Participant has given written informed consent |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Pregnancy 2. Age <18 years 3. Missing Compliance 4. Untreated or refractory phlegmona or untreated osteomyelitis of the wound 5. Exposed blood vessels in or around the wound that can't be protected or have a heightened risk for a bleeding with relevant circulation effects 6. Any revascularization procedure or amputation of the same extremity within the last 5 days 7. Indication for above-ankle amputation of the same extremity 8. Any extreme defective position of toes, foot or the whole extremity which could lead to ischemia of the wound area and impair wound healing 9. Evidence of inadequate perfusion 9.1. via MR angiography within the last 3 month or 9.2. sonographic confirmation of absence of peripheral pulse at A. tibialis posterior or A. dorsalis pedis) or 9.3. transcutaneous oxygen measurements of the dorsum of the foot ≤30 mmHg or 9.4. ankle brachial indices ≥0,7 and ≤1.2 and toe pressure at ≤30 mmHg 10. Renal insufficiency with need for dialysis 11. Anemia which is not caused infection 12. Long term use of oral (p.o.) steroids (> 30days) 13. Chronic anticoagulation except acetylsalicylate, clopidogrel (e.g. by vitamin K an-tagonists) at screening that can't be bridged to heparins during participation in the trial 14. Nerve lesions or active Charcot disease (Diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy) of either lower extremity that will interfere with wound treatment 15. Malignancy in the wound or the periwound area or any other malignancy requiring immunosuppressant therapy or chemotherapy 16. Wounds resulting from burns, untreated cellulitis or collagen vascular disease 17. Presence of necrotic tissue that cannot be debrided 18. Concomitant severe skin disease that may impair wound healing 19. Connective tissue disease that might impair wound healing 20. Hematological disorders or condition that might impair wound healing 21. History of significant chronic anemia as evidenced by hemoglobin concentration of < 10 g/dl within 30 days of screening 22. Any kind of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) or CVI that leads to varicose eczema, lo-cal inflammation and an increased risk of ulcers 23. Use of VAC® negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or any other suction device system on the study wound ≤ 8 days prior to screening 24. Previous treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) or normothermic therapy in the past 8 days 25. Application of recombinant or autologous growth factors on the study wound ≤ 8 days prior to screening 26. Application of skin or dermal substitutes and dressings with living cells capable of producing growth factors (e.g. Oasis®, Apligraf®, Dermagraft™, or Integra®) on the study extremity < 15 days prior to screening 27. Allergy to any disposal component of the VAC® or MWT used materials 28. Simultaneous participation in other interventional trials interfering with one of the approaches in this trial 29. Previous participation in this trial |
Date of first enrolment | 01/06/2011 |
Date of final enrolment | 30/09/2013 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Germany
Study participating centre
Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin
Köln
51109
Germany
51109
Germany
Sponsor information
Private University of Witten/Herdecke gGmbH (Germany)
University/education
University/education
Medical Faculty
Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50
Witten
58448
Germany
sekretariat-neugebauer@uni-wh.de | |
Website | http://www.uni-wh.de |
https://ror.org/00yq55g44 |
Funders
Funder type
Industry
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (USA)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |