Evaluation of an electronic Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit (eOGTTK)
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN91288133 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN91288133 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | TRG 10/02 |
- Submission date
- 18/04/2012
- Registration date
- 27/04/2012
- Last edited
- 23/10/2013
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
In routine clinical practice, the most accurate way to diagnose diabetes is by conducting an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT). An OGTT is conducted in a clinical setting (hospital or GP surgery) and involves taking blood from a vein before and after consumption of a standard sugary drink. The blood samples are sent to a laboratory for measurement of the levels of sugar (glucose) in the blood. This test can also detect changes in blood sugar levels before diabetes develops (pre-diabetes).
This study evaluated a new electronic OGTT kit that measured the level of sugar in fingerprick blood samples and was designed to be used by untrained individuals in their home. The study investigated whether the kit produced accurate and repeatable blood sugar measurements, whether participants were able to use the kit unaided, and what their feelings were about performing the test themselves.
Who can participate?
The study involved 30 participants, of whom 12 had previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes (stable for the last 3 months using diet or metformin only), 18 did not have known diabetes. The participants could have been male or female and were aged 18 or over.
What does the study involve?
Participants were asked to use the electronic OGTT kit on six occasions. The kit used fingerprick blood samples and did not require any laboratory involvement or trained personnel.
The electronic OGTT kit was assessed in 3 different settings:
1. Two home-based (and unobserved) tests
2. Two clinic-based and observed tests (preferably without any nurse intervention)
3. Two clinic-based and nurse-led tests
During the two nurse-led visits, venous blood samples for laboratory measurement of sugar were taken in tandem with the fingerprick blood samples. No drugs (oral, topical or injected) were being tested in this study.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There was no direct benefit to the participant from this study. The results of this study may provide valuable information about the future use of the electronic OGTT kit by the general public. This knowledge may be used to help others by enabling widespread screening of individuals in regions with limited access to clinical staff and laboratory resources. In the unlikely event that participants had previously unrecognized impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes this would have been detected so that treatment could be commenced at an earlier stage to give greater benefits. Some people may have felt nausea if they consumed the glucose drink too quickly. Some people may have experienced sore fingers after the finger pricks. Occasionally there may have been local bruising as a result of blood drawn from the vein.
Where is the study run from?
Clinical Research Unit at the Oxford Centre for Diabetes (Oxford, UK).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The first participant was recruited in April 2011 and the last visit took place in July 2011.
Who is funding the study?
Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland).
Who is the main contact?
Prof M. Angelyn Bethel
trg@dtu.ox.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
Diabetes Trials Unit
Oxford Centre for Diabetes
Endocrinology and Metabolism
Old Road
Headington
Oxford
OX3 7LJ
United Kingdom
Study information
| Study design | Randomized crossover study |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Other |
| Study type | Diagnostic |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Evaluation of an electronic Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit: a randomized crossover study |
| Study acronym | eOGTTK |
| Study objectives | The study assessed the reliability, repeatability, and user acceptability of a novel electronic Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit (eOGTTK) that guided untrained individuals to perform an oral glucose tolerance test in a home setting using capillary blood samples. |
| Ethics approval(s) | South East London Research Ethics Committee, 15 March 2011, ref: 10/H0808/164 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Diabetes (type 2) |
| Intervention | Participants used the eOGTTK on six occasions in three settings: 1. Two home based (and unobserved) tests 2. Two clinic based and observed tests (preferably without any nurse intervention) 3. Two clinic based and nurse-led tests During the two nurse-led visits, venous blood samples for a standard laboratory OGTT were collected at the same time. Tests were scheduled between 2 and 7 days apart, resulting in a maximum duration of observation up to 7 weeks. Focus groups to assess user acceptability were scheduled within 4 weeks of the last test. Samples from the 0 and 120 minute time points of the eOGTTK tests were compared to asses the degree of variation in different settings (repeatability) and the degree of variation (reproducibility) within each setting. Samples from the 0 and 120 minute time points of the eOGTTK test and the laboratory test were compared to evaluate the accuracy of the eOGTTK values. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | To evaluate the precision of the eOGTTK by assessing: 1. Repeatability: the degree of variation when assessed in different settings 2. Reproducibility: the degree of variation within each setting |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. To evaluate the user acceptability of the eOGTTK through the use of a validated device satisfaction questionnaire and focus groups 2. To investigate any possible training effects with repeated eOGTTK use 3. To evaluate the accuracy of the eOGTTK 0 and 120 values compared with laboratory measured venous plasma glucose values |
| Overall study start date | 01/04/2011 |
| Completion date | 06/07/2011 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | UK Sample Size: 30 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study 2. Aged 18 years or above 3. Had adequate vision and reading comprehension to follow the electronic OGTT kit instructions in English 4. Patients with type 2 diabetes were: 4.1. Treated with diet alone or with metformin monotherapy 4.2. Had stable therapy for at least 3 months prior to study enrollment or 5. Individuals without diagnosed diabetes had no prior experience of an OGTT or any tests which involved finger-pricking |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period 2. Participant taking drugs that may affect glucose levels 3. History or current evidence of any condition, therapy, laboratory abnormality, or other circumstance which, in the opinion of the investigator, posed an unacceptable risk to the individual, confounded the results of the study, or was likely to interfere with the individuals participation of the full duration of the trial |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/04/2011 |
| Date of final enrolment | 06/07/2011 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
OX3 7LJ
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Industry
Lichstrasse 35
Basel
4056
Switzerland
| Website | http://www.novartis.com/ |
|---|---|
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/02f9zrr09 |
Funders
Funder type
Industry
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other publications | Also available on the Oxford University Research Archive: | 01/06/2013 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | results | 01/06/2013 | Yes | No |
